Department of Radiology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsuruma-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8550, Japan.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):202-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.4108.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to predict malignancy of breast masses, with subsequent recommendation for biopsy.
For 115 breast masses classified as BI-RADS category 4 or 5, which were assessed according to combined findings of mammography, B-mode sonography, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, two radiologists retrospectively evaluated the elasticity scores using ultrasound elastography and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values using MR DWI. The diagnostic abilities of these two techniques were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
In the analysis of all 115 breast masses, the elasticity score was predictive of malignancy, whereas the ADC value was not independently predictive. In an analysis of the 52 masses assessed as BI-RADS category 4, the elasticity score was found to be a significant predictor of malignancy, compared with the ADC value, which was a nonsignificant predictor. In an analysis of the 63 masses assessed as BI-RADS category 5, neither the elasticity score nor the ADC value was a significant predictor of malignancy.
Our results show that elasticity imaging provides relatively reliable predictions for malignancy, especially in BI-RADS category 4 masses, compared with MR DWI.
本研究旨在评估超声弹性成像和磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)预测乳腺肿块恶性程度的能力,并为后续活检提供建议。
对于 115 个经乳腺钼靶、B 超和动态增强 MRI 综合评估为 BI-RADS 4 或 5 类的乳腺肿块,两位放射科医生分别采用超声弹性成像和磁共振 DWI 技术测量其表观扩散系数(ADC)值,通过单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析评估这两种技术的诊断效能。
在对 115 个肿块的分析中,弹性评分是恶性的预测指标,而 ADC 值则不是。在对 52 个 BI-RADS 4 类肿块的分析中,弹性评分是恶性的显著预测指标,而 ADC 值则不是。在对 63 个 BI-RADS 5 类肿块的分析中,弹性评分和 ADC 值均不是恶性的显著预测指标。
与磁共振 DWI 相比,弹性成像在预测乳腺肿块的恶性程度方面具有较高的可信度,尤其是在 BI-RADS 4 类肿块中。