Suppr超能文献

两种不同的感兴趣区放置方法用于通过表观扩散系数值鉴别乳腺良恶性病变

Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value.

作者信息

Gity Masoumeh, Moradi Behnaz, Arami Rasool, Arabkheradmand Ali, Kazemi Mohamad Ali

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Email:

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Oct 26;19(10):2765-2770. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.10.2765.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the influence of different methods of region-of-interest (ROI) placement on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in breast tumours and their accuracy in differentiating benign versus malignant tumors in mass and nonmass lesions. Methods and Materials: In this prospective study, 79 patients with 98 breast lesions, from 2015 until 2017, were investigated by 1.5-T breast MRI. Histopathology evaluation were done for all malignant lesions and most of the benign ones. ADC values were measured in normal breast tissue and by two ways of ROI placement in the breast lesions (mass and non-mass): 1- ROI covering the whole lesion, 2- ROI in the highest part (most restricted area) of the lesion in DWI images. The accuracy of these two approaches were compared. Results: The age range was 17-68 years with mean age 43.3 ± 9.9 years. 49% of the lesions were benign and 51% of tumors were malignant. Our results revealed that the measured ADC values in normal breast tissue were higher than breast lesions (P≤0.01). Appropriate cut off determination in non-mass was not valid by both methods, but in mass in the first way was 1.45×10 -³mm²/s and in the most restricted part was 1.16×10-³ mm²/s. ADC values differed significantly between the two ways of ROI placement in mass lesions (P<.001). Most restricted part ADC showed the best diagnostic performance in mass lesions with area under curve 0.88 versus 0.82. Conclusion: ROI placement has significant impact on the meseaured ADC values of breast lesions and ROIs in most restricted parts were more accurate than whole-lesion ROIs. Cut-off values differed significantly based on the methods of measurement.

摘要

目的

我们旨在研究不同的感兴趣区(ROI)放置方法对乳腺肿瘤表观扩散系数(ADC)值的影响,以及它们在鉴别肿块和非肿块病变中的良性与恶性肿瘤方面的准确性。方法和材料:在这项前瞻性研究中,2015年至2017年期间,对79例患有98个乳腺病变的患者进行了1.5-T乳腺MRI检查。对所有恶性病变和大多数良性病变进行了组织病理学评估。在正常乳腺组织以及通过两种在乳腺病变(肿块和非肿块)中放置ROI的方式测量ADC值:1-ROI覆盖整个病变,2-ROI位于DWI图像中病变的最高部分(最受限区域)。比较了这两种方法的准确性。结果:年龄范围为17 - 68岁,平均年龄43.3±9.9岁。49%的病变为良性,51%的肿瘤为恶性。我们的结果显示,正常乳腺组织中测得的ADC值高于乳腺病变(P≤0.01)。两种方法在非肿块病变中确定合适的截断值均无效,但在肿块病变中,第一种方法的截断值为1.45×10⁻³mm²/s,在最受限部分为1.16×10⁻³mm²/s。在肿块病变中,两种ROI放置方式的ADC值差异显著(P<0.001)。在肿块病变中,最受限部分的ADC显示出最佳诊断性能,曲线下面积为0.88,而另一种方法为0.82。结论:ROI放置对乳腺病变的测量ADC值有显著影响,最受限部分的ROI比整个病变的ROI更准确。截断值根据测量方法的不同而有显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f47/6291064/78f3222c7742/APJCP-19-2765-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验