Bateman Geoff, Barclay Craig W, Saunders William P
Birmingham Dental Hospital, UK.
Dent Update. 2010 Nov;37(9):579-82, 585-6, 589-90 passim. doi: 10.12968/denu.2010.37.9.579.
This narrative review explores treatment planning options in restorative dentistry. The growth of dental implants, as an accessible and predictable treatment option, gives practitioners a useful tool for managing the missing tooth or teeth with a hopeless prognosis. Traditionally, endodontics and fixed prosthodontics have been used to restore teeth and spaces where the outlook for such treatment appears reasonable. Practitioners may, however, question the predictability and cost effectiveness of such an approach where, at times, it might appear that replacement of a compromised tooth with a dental implant could be a more predictable option. The evidence base for these treatment options is explored and discussed, and suggestions are made for future management strategies.
A clear knowledge and understanding of the scientific literature for implants and endodontic treatment is necessary if practitioners are to make an evidence-based approach when treatment planning these modalities for their patients. This is particularly true in cases where there may appear to be a reasonable choice between the two of these.
本叙述性综述探讨了修复牙科中的治疗计划选择。牙科种植体作为一种可及且可预测的治疗选择不断发展,为从业者提供了一种有用的工具,用于处理预后无望的一颗或多颗缺失牙。传统上,牙髓病学和固定义齿修复学一直用于修复牙齿和间隙,在此类治疗前景看似合理的情况下。然而,从业者可能会质疑这种方法的可预测性和成本效益,因为有时用牙科种植体替换一颗受损牙齿似乎可能是更可预测的选择。本文探讨并讨论了这些治疗选择的证据基础,并对未来的管理策略提出了建议。
如果从业者要在为患者制定这些治疗方式的治疗计划时采用循证方法,那么对种植体和牙髓治疗的科学文献有清晰的认识和理解是必要的。在这两者之间可能存在合理选择的情况下尤其如此。