Brkanić Tatjana, Ivana Stojsin, Vukoje Karolina, Zivković Slavoljub
Dental Clinic of Vojvodina, School of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010 Sep-Oct;138(9-10):551-6. doi: 10.2298/sarh1010551b.
Root canal preparation is the most important phase of endodontic procedure and it consists of adequate canal space cleaning and shaping. In recent years, rotary instruments and techniques have gained importance because of the great efficacy, speed and safety of the preparation procedure.
The aim of this research was to investigate the influence of different NiTi files on the canal wall cleaning quality, residual dentine debris and smear layer.
The research was conducted on extracted human teeth in vitro conditions. Teeth were divided in 7 main groups depending on the kind of instruments used for root canal preparation: ProTaper, GT, ProFile, K-3, FlexMaster, hand ProTaper and hand GT. Root canal preparation was accomplished by crown-down technique. Prepared samples were assessed on scanning electron microscopy JEOL, JSM-6460 LV. The evaluation of dentine debris was done with 500x magnification, and the evaluation of smear layer with 1,000 times magnification. Quantitive assessment of dentine debris and smear layer was done according to the criteria of Hulsmann.
The least amount of debris and smear layer has been found in canals shaped with ProFile instruments, and the largest amount in canals shaped with FlexMaster instruments. Canal cleaning efficacy of hand GTand ProTaperfiles has been similar to cleaning efficacy of rotary NiTi files. Statistic analysis has shown a significant difference in amount of dentine debris and smear layer on the canal walls between sample groups. shaped with different instruments.
Completely clean canals have not been found in any tested group of instruments. The largest amount of debris and smear layer has been found in the apical third of all canals. The design and the type of endodontic instruments influence the efficacy of the canal cleaning.
根管预备是牙髓治疗过程中最重要的阶段,它包括充分的根管空间清理和塑形。近年来,旋转器械和技术因其在预备过程中的高效、快速和安全而变得重要。
本研究的目的是调查不同镍钛锉对根管壁清洁质量、残留牙本质碎屑和玷污层的影响。
本研究在体外提取的人牙上进行。根据用于根管预备的器械种类,牙齿被分为7个主要组:ProTaper、GT、ProFile、K-3、FlexMaster、手动ProTaper和手动GT。根管预备采用冠向下技术完成。制备的样本在JEOL JSM-6460 LV扫描电子显微镜下进行评估。牙本质碎屑的评估在500倍放大倍数下进行,玷污层的评估在1000倍放大倍数下进行。根据胡尔斯曼的标准对牙本质碎屑和玷污层进行定量评估。
使用ProFile器械塑形的根管中发现的碎屑和玷污层最少,而使用FlexMaster器械塑形的根管中发现的最多。手动GT和ProTaper锉的根管清洁效果与旋转镍钛锉的清洁效果相似。统计分析表明,不同器械塑形的样本组之间根管壁上的牙本质碎屑和玷污层数量存在显著差异。
在任何测试的器械组中都未发现完全清洁的根管。在所有根管的根尖三分之一处发现的碎屑和玷污层最多。牙髓器械的设计和类型会影响根管清洁的效果。