Räisänen Sari, Vehviläinen-Julkunen Katri, Gissler Mika, Heinonen Seppo
Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, P,O, Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Dec 23;3:345. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-345.
The occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) - which may have serious, long-term effects on affected women, including faecal incontinence, despite primary repair - varies widely between countries and have been chosen one of the indicators for patient safety in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and in Nordic countries.
The aim of the study was to assess risks of OASIS among five university teaching hospitals and 14 non-university central hospitals with more than 1,000 deliveries annually during 1997-2007 in Finland. Women with singleton vaginal deliveries divided into two populations consisting of all 168,637 women from five university hospitals and all 255,660 women from non-university hospitals, respectively, derived from population-based register. Primiparous and multiparous women with OASIS (n = 2,448) were compared in terms of possible risk factors to primiparous and multiparous women without OASIS, respectively, using stepwise logistic regression analysis. The occurrences of OASIS varied from 0.7% to 2.1% in primiparous and from 0.1% to 0.3% in multiparous women among the university hospitals. Three-fold inter-hospital differences in OASIS rates did not significantly change after adjustment for patient mix or the use of interventions. In non-university hospitals OASIS rates varied from 0.2% to 1.4% in primiparous and from 0.02% to 0.4% in multiparous women, and the results remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for known risks.
Up to 3.2-fold inter-hospital differences in OASIS risk demonstrates significant differences in the quality of Finnish obstetric care.
产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的发生率在不同国家之间差异很大,尽管进行了一期修复,但仍可能对受影响的女性产生严重的长期影响,包括大便失禁。在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家和北欧国家,OASIS已被选为患者安全的指标之一。
该研究的目的是评估1997年至2007年期间芬兰五家大学教学医院和14家每年分娩超过1000例的非大学中心医院中OASIS的风险。单胎阴道分娩的女性分为两个人群,分别由五家大学医院的所有168,637名女性和非大学医院的所有255,660名女性组成,数据来源于基于人群的登记册。分别使用逐步逻辑回归分析,将患有OASIS的初产妇和经产妇(n = 2,448)与未患OASIS的初产妇和经产妇的可能危险因素进行比较。在大学医院中,初产妇的OASIS发生率从0.7%到2.1%不等,经产妇从0.1%到0.3%不等。在调整患者构成或干预措施的使用后,医院间OASIS发生率的三倍差异没有显著变化。在非大学医院中,初产妇的OASIS发生率从0.2%到1.4%不等,经产妇从0.02%到0.4%不等,在调整已知风险后结果基本保持不变。
OASIS风险在医院间高达3.2倍的差异表明芬兰产科护理质量存在显著差异。