• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Up to seven-fold inter-hospital differences in obstetric anal sphincter injury rates- A birth register-based study in Finland.芬兰一项基于出生登记的研究:产科肛门括约肌损伤率在不同医院之间相差高达七倍。
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Dec 23;3:345. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-345.
2
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
3
High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: a birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland.高会阴切开率可预防产科肛门括约肌撕裂:芬兰分娩干预政策的出生登记研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(5):457-63. doi: 10.1177/1403494811404276. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
4
Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries-a retrospective register-based study in Finland.真空辅助分娩与产科肛门括约肌损伤风险:芬兰一项基于注册的回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03455.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
5
[Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].[产科肛门括约肌损伤的定义、流行病学及危险因素:CNGOF产科会阴预防与保护指南]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Hospital-based lateral episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury rates: a retrospective population-based register study.基于医院的会阴侧切术和产科肛门括约肌损伤率:一项回顾性基于人群的登记研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):347.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
Long-term anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury-does grade of tear matter?分娩性肛门括约肌损伤后长期肛门失禁-撕裂程度重要吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):232.e1-232.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.569. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
The association between vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery and anal sphincter injury.真空辅助阴道分娩与肛门括约肌损伤的关系。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1771-1777. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04534-8. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
9
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: To prolong or to vacuum?产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:是延长产程还是使用真空吸引?
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Women's experiences of the OASI Care Bundle; a package of care to reduce severe perineal trauma.女性对 OASI 护理包的体验;减少严重会阴创伤的护理包。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04653-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Enhancing recognition of obstetric anal sphincter injuries in six maternity units in Palestine: an interventional quality improvement study.提高巴勒斯坦六家妇产科医院对产科肛门括约肌损伤的识别能力:一项干预性质量改进研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 19;8(6):e020983. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020983.
3
Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam.越南产科医生和助产士对会阴切开术使用的知识、态度和经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Apr 23;15:101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0531-2.
4
Can the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) be predicted using a risk-scoring system?能否使用风险评分系统预测产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIs)的风险?
BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jul 24;7:471. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-471.
5
Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study.会阴保护训练后产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率:队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 17;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001649. Print 2012.

本文引用的文献

1
Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture.会阴侧切术可保护初产妇而非经产妇免于发生产科肛门括约肌破裂。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1365-72. doi: 10.3109/00016340903295626.
2
The increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture--an emerging trend in Finland.产科肛门括约肌破裂发生率增加——芬兰的一个新趋势。
Prev Med. 2009 Dec;49(6):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
3
Changing incidence of anal sphincter tears in four Nordic countries through the last decades.过去几十年间,四个北欧国家肛门括约肌撕裂的发病率变化情况。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Sep;146(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.033. Epub 2009 May 30.
4
Risk factors for anal sphincter disruption during child birth.分娩期间肛门括约肌破裂的危险因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2009 May;394(3):535-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-008-0441-0. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
5
Decreasing the incidence of anal sphincter tears during delivery.降低分娩过程中肛门括约肌撕裂的发生率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 May;111(5):1053-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816c4402.
6
The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture in primiparous women: a comparison between two European delivery settings.初产妇产科肛门括约肌破裂的发生率:两种欧洲分娩环境的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(2):209-15. doi: 10.1080/00016340701832661.
7
Risk factors for anal sphincter tear during vaginal delivery.阴道分娩时肛门括约肌撕裂的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):29-34. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242616.56617.ff.
8
The role of mediolateral episiotomy during labour: analysis of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears.分娩时会阴侧切术的作用:产科肛门括约肌撕裂的危险因素分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(7):856-60. doi: 10.1080/00016340500408283.
9
Short-term and long-term effects of obstetric anal sphincter injury and their management.产科肛门括约肌损伤的短期和长期影响及其处理
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;17(6):605-10. doi: 10.1097/01.gco.0000191901.69320.a0.
10
Women's experiences after a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: a qualitative study.
Birth. 2005 Jun;32(2):129-36. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00356.x.

芬兰一项基于出生登记的研究:产科肛门括约肌损伤率在不同医院之间相差高达七倍。

Up to seven-fold inter-hospital differences in obstetric anal sphincter injury rates- A birth register-based study in Finland.

作者信息

Räisänen Sari, Vehviläinen-Julkunen Katri, Gissler Mika, Heinonen Seppo

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, P,O, Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2010 Dec 23;3:345. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-345.

DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-3-345
PMID:21182773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3022816/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) - which may have serious, long-term effects on affected women, including faecal incontinence, despite primary repair - varies widely between countries and have been chosen one of the indicators for patient safety in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and in Nordic countries.

FINDINGS

The aim of the study was to assess risks of OASIS among five university teaching hospitals and 14 non-university central hospitals with more than 1,000 deliveries annually during 1997-2007 in Finland. Women with singleton vaginal deliveries divided into two populations consisting of all 168,637 women from five university hospitals and all 255,660 women from non-university hospitals, respectively, derived from population-based register. Primiparous and multiparous women with OASIS (n = 2,448) were compared in terms of possible risk factors to primiparous and multiparous women without OASIS, respectively, using stepwise logistic regression analysis. The occurrences of OASIS varied from 0.7% to 2.1% in primiparous and from 0.1% to 0.3% in multiparous women among the university hospitals. Three-fold inter-hospital differences in OASIS rates did not significantly change after adjustment for patient mix or the use of interventions. In non-university hospitals OASIS rates varied from 0.2% to 1.4% in primiparous and from 0.02% to 0.4% in multiparous women, and the results remained virtually unchanged after adjustment for known risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 3.2-fold inter-hospital differences in OASIS risk demonstrates significant differences in the quality of Finnish obstetric care.

摘要

背景

产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的发生率在不同国家之间差异很大,尽管进行了一期修复,但仍可能对受影响的女性产生严重的长期影响,包括大便失禁。在经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家和北欧国家,OASIS已被选为患者安全的指标之一。

研究结果

该研究的目的是评估1997年至2007年期间芬兰五家大学教学医院和14家每年分娩超过1000例的非大学中心医院中OASIS的风险。单胎阴道分娩的女性分为两个人群,分别由五家大学医院的所有168,637名女性和非大学医院的所有255,660名女性组成,数据来源于基于人群的登记册。分别使用逐步逻辑回归分析,将患有OASIS的初产妇和经产妇(n = 2,448)与未患OASIS的初产妇和经产妇的可能危险因素进行比较。在大学医院中,初产妇的OASIS发生率从0.7%到2.1%不等,经产妇从0.1%到0.3%不等。在调整患者构成或干预措施的使用后,医院间OASIS发生率的三倍差异没有显著变化。在非大学医院中,初产妇的OASIS发生率从0.2%到1.4%不等,经产妇从0.02%到0.4%不等,在调整已知风险后结果基本保持不变。

结论

OASIS风险在医院间高达3.2倍的差异表明芬兰产科护理质量存在显著差异。