• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

会阴侧切术可保护初产妇而非经产妇免于发生产科肛门括约肌破裂。

Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture.

机构信息

Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1365-72. doi: 10.3109/00016340903295626.

DOI:10.3109/00016340903295626
PMID:19852569
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter rupture (OASR).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective population-based register study.

POPULATION

A total of 514,741 women with singleton pregnancy and vaginal delivery between 1997 and 2007 in Finland.

METHODS

Primiparous (n = 2,315) and multiparous women (n = 534) with OASR were compared with primiparous and multiparous women without OASR by using stepwise logistic regression analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The OASR risk.

RESULTS

Episiotomy decreased the likelihood of OASR for the primiparous [odds ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% CI (confidence interval) 0.75-0.92], but not the multiparous women (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.67-2.44). The strongest risk factors for OASR among the primiparous women were forceps delivery (OR 10.20, 95% CI 3.60-28.90), birth weight over 4,000 g (OR 4.66, 95% CI 3.86-5.63), vacuum assisted delivery (OR 3.88, 95% CI 3.25-4.63), occiput posterior presentation (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.64-6.15), and prolonged active second stage of birth (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.65-2.58). Episiotomy was associated with decreased risks for OASR in vacuum assisted deliveries (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85). Risk factors for OASR among the multiparous women included forceps delivery (OR 10.13, 95% CI 2.46-41.81), prolonged active second stage of the birth (OR 7.18, 95% CI 4.32-11.91), birth weight over 4,000 g (OR 5.84, 95% CI 3.40-10.02), and vacuum assisted delivery (OR 4.17, 95% CI 3.17-5.48).

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the restrictive use of episiotomy, since 909 episiotomies appear to be needed to prevent one OASR among primiparous women. Equivalent estimate in vacuum assisted deliveries among primiparous women was 66, favoring routine use of episiotomy in such cases.

摘要

目的

确定产科肛门括约肌撕裂(OASR)的风险因素。

设计和设置

回顾性基于人群的登记研究。

人群

1997 年至 2007 年间芬兰共有 514741 名单胎妊娠和阴道分娩的初产妇(n=2315)和经产妇(n=534)。

方法

通过逐步逻辑回归分析,将 OASR 的初产妇(n=2315)和经产妇(n=534)与无 OASR 的初产妇和经产妇进行比较。

主要观察指标

OASR 风险。

结果

会阴切开术降低了初产妇发生 OASR 的可能性[比值比(OR)0.83,95%置信区间(CI)0.75-0.92],但对经产妇无此影响(OR 2.01,95%CI 1.67-2.44)。初产妇发生 OASR 的最强风险因素是产钳分娩(OR 10.20,95%CI 3.60-28.90)、出生体重>4000g(OR 4.66,95%CI 3.86-5.63)、真空辅助分娩(OR 3.88,95%CI 3.25-4.63)、枕后位(OR 3.17,95%CI 1.64-6.15)和活跃期第二产程延长(OR 2.06,95%CI 1.65-2.58)。会阴切开术与真空辅助分娩中 OASR 风险降低相关(OR 0.70,95%CI 0.57-0.85)。经产妇发生 OASR 的风险因素包括产钳分娩(OR 10.13,95%CI 2.46-41.81)、活跃期第二产程延长(OR 7.18,95%CI 4.32-11.91)、出生体重>4000g(OR 5.84,95%CI 3.40-10.02)和真空辅助分娩(OR 4.17,95%CI 3.17-5.48)。

结论

研究结果支持限制会阴切开术的使用,因为初产妇需要 909 例会阴切开术才能预防一例 OASR。初产妇中真空辅助分娩的等效估计为 66,支持在这种情况下常规使用会阴切开术。

相似文献

1
Lateral episiotomy protects primiparous but not multiparous women from obstetric anal sphincter rupture.会阴侧切术可保护初产妇而非经产妇免于发生产科肛门括约肌破裂。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(12):1365-72. doi: 10.3109/00016340903295626.
2
High episiotomy rate protects from obstetric anal sphincter ruptures: a birth register-study on delivery intervention policies in Finland.高会阴切开率可预防产科肛门括约肌撕裂:芬兰分娩干预政策的出生登记研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2011 Jul;39(5):457-63. doi: 10.1177/1403494811404276. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
3
Obstetric anal sphincter rupture in older primiparous women: a case-control study.高龄初产妇的产科肛门括约肌破裂:一项病例对照研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(10):1252-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340600839890.
4
The incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture in primiparous women: a comparison between two European delivery settings.初产妇产科肛门括约肌破裂的发生率:两种欧洲分娩环境的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(2):209-15. doi: 10.1080/00016340701832661.
5
Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery.会阴侧切术可降低阴道助产分娩时肛门括约肌损伤的风险。
BJOG. 2008 Jan;115(1):104-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01554.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
6
The increased incidence of obstetric anal sphincter rupture--an emerging trend in Finland.产科肛门括约肌破裂发生率增加——芬兰的一个新趋势。
Prev Med. 2009 Dec;49(6):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
7
Vacuum-assisted deliveries and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries-a retrospective register-based study in Finland.真空辅助分娩与产科肛门括约肌损伤风险:芬兰一项基于注册的回顾性研究。
BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03455.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
8
Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States.美国一家产科病房中阴道分娩伴肛门括约肌断裂后的大便和小便失禁情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1543-9; discussion 1549-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.030.
9
Risk factors for anal sphincter tear in multiparas.经产妇肛门括约肌撕裂的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1233-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000217696.25548.ff.
10
The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries.枕后位胎儿头部位置对产钳辅助阴道分娩时肛门括约肌损伤风险的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1702-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.047.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of episiotomy incidence and risk factors in vaginal deliveries: a single-center.阴道分娩中会阴切开术发生率及危险因素分析:单中心研究
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jul 17;4(3):100371. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100371. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.会阴正中切开术/外侧切开术联合产道助产分娩与产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)风险降低的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jun;33(6):1393-1405. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05145-1. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
3
The perception and knowledge about episiotomy: A cross-sectional survey involving healthcare workers in a low- and middle-income country.
会阴切开术的认知和知识:一项涉及中低收入国家医护人员的横断面调查。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021 Apr 28;13(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2424.
4
One Plus One Equals Two-will that do? A trial protocol for a Swedish multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate a clinical practice to reduce severe perineal trauma {1}.一加一等于二——这样可以吗?一项瑞典多中心随机对照试验的试验方案,旨在评估一项减少严重会阴创伤的临床实践{1}。
Trials. 2020 Nov 23;21(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04837-7.
5
Evidence-based intrapartum practice and its associated factors at a tertiary teaching hospital in the Philippines, a descriptive mixed-methods study.菲律宾一所三级教学医院的循证产时实践及其相关因素:一项描述性混合方法研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 5;20(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2778-5.
6
Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.初产妇真空辅助分娩中侧切术与不侧切术对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤的效果比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 13;9(3):e025050. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025050.
7
Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: A retrospective nationwide study.产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险和保护因素:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Birth. 2018 Dec;45(4):409-415. doi: 10.1111/birt.12346. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury increases with maternal age irrespective of parity: a population-based register study.产妇年龄与产科肛门括约肌损伤风险相关,与产次无关:基于人群的登记研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1473-7.
9
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Anal sphincter injury in vaginal deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia.阴道分娩并发肩难产时的肛门括约肌损伤。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):377-381. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3351-2. Epub 2017 May 18.