Garmi Gali, Peretz Hadar, Braverman Meirav, Berkovich Ilanit, Molnar Robert, Salim Raed
Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel; Emek Medical Center, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Afula, Israel.
Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
Midwifery. 2016 Mar;34:178-182. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
An awareness of risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) is essential in order to reduce the occurrence of the primary event. These risk factors are demographic, obstetric and intrapartum related. We aimed to identify the risk factors for OASIS and to examine how modifiable risk factors may be used in order to reduce the incidence of OASIS.
A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted in the delivery ward of a single university teaching hospital in Israel, using data from January 2004 to July 2012. All singleton vaginal deliveries at term with OASIS were included. The controls included women matched at a ratio of 1:2 based on gestational age and deliveries that occurred immediately before and after the delivery of the women in the study group.
Overall, 113 OASIS were identified. Stepwise conditional logistic regression revealed that the first vaginal birth (OR = 7.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-16.3; p < 0.001) particularly after a previous caesarean section (OR = 13.6; 95% CI, 4.7-39.3; p < 0.001) and the length of the second stage (OR 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1, p = 0.045) were the only risk factors for OASIS. Among 24 primiparous women who already had a prolonged second stage, 15 delivered by vacuum extraction and nine spontaneously; OASIS occurred in eight (53%) and three (33%) women, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that this difference was not significant (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 0.4-12.7; p = 0.35).
The first vaginal birth particularly after a caesarean delivery and the length of the second stage increased the risk of OASIS. Vacuum extraction performed to shorten a prolonged second stage is not necessarily protective.
了解产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)的危险因素对于减少原发性事件的发生至关重要。这些危险因素与人口统计学、产科和分娩期相关。我们旨在确定OASIS的危险因素,并研究如何利用可改变的危险因素来降低OASIS的发生率。
在以色列一家大学教学医院的产房进行了一项回顾性配对病例对照研究,使用2004年1月至2012年7月的数据。纳入所有足月单胎阴道分娩且发生OASIS的病例。对照组包括根据孕周以1:2比例匹配的妇女,以及在研究组妇女分娩前后立即分娩的妇女。
总体而言,共识别出113例OASIS。逐步条件逻辑回归显示,首次阴道分娩(比值比[OR]=7.6;95%置信区间[CI],3.5-16.3;P<0.001),尤其是既往剖宫产术后的首次阴道分娩(OR=13.6;95%CI,4.7-39.3;P<0.001)和第二产程时长(OR 1.5;95%CI,1.1-2.1,P=0.045)是OASIS的唯一危险因素。在24例第二产程延长的初产妇中,15例通过真空吸引助产,9例自然分娩;分别有8例(53%)和3例(33%)发生OASIS。多因素分析显示,这种差异无统计学意义(OR=2.3;95%CI,0.4-12.7;P=0.35)。
首次阴道分娩,尤其是剖宫产术后的首次阴道分娩以及第二产程时长增加了OASIS的风险。为缩短延长的第二产程而进行的真空吸引助产不一定具有保护作用。