Suppr超能文献

作为国际癌症基准伙伴关系的一部分,对10个国际司法管辖区的癌症诊断途径进行调查:调查的开展与实施。

An investigation of routes to cancer diagnosis in 10 international jurisdictions, as part of the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: survey development and implementation.

作者信息

Weller David, Vedsted Peter, Anandan Chantelle, Zalounina Alina, Fourkala Evangelia Ourania, Desai Rakshit, Liston William, Jensen Henry, Barisic Andriana, Gavin Anna, Grunfeld Eva, Lambe Mats, Law Rebecca-Jane, Malmberg Martin, Neal Richard D, Kalsi Jatinderpal, Turner Donna, White Victoria, Bomb Martine, Menon Usha

机构信息

Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 25;6(7):e009641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009641.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper describes the methods used in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 4 Survey (ICBPM4) which examines time intervals and routes to cancer diagnosis in 10 jurisdictions. We present the study design with defining and measuring time intervals, identifying patients with cancer, questionnaire development, data management and analyses.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Recruitment of participants to the ICBPM4 survey is based on cancer registries in each jurisdiction. Questionnaires draw on previous instruments and have been through a process of cognitive testing and piloting in three jurisdictions followed by standardised translation and adaptation. Data analysis focuses on comparing differences in time intervals and routes to diagnosis in the jurisdictions.

PARTICIPANTS

Our target is 200 patients with symptomatic breast, lung, colorectal and ovarian cancer in each jurisdiction. Patients are approached directly or via their primary care physician (PCP). Patients' PCPs and cancer treatment specialists (CTSs) are surveyed, and 'data rules' are applied to combine and reconcile conflicting information. Where CTS information is unavailable, audit information is sought from treatment records and databases.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Reliability testing of the patient questionnaire showed that agreement was complete (κ=1) in four items and substantial (κ=0.8, 95% CI 0.333 to 1) in one item. The identification of eligible patients is sufficient to meet the targets for breast, lung and colorectal cancer. Initial patient and PCP survey response rates from the UK and Sweden are comparable with similar published surveys. Data collection was completed in early 2016 for all cancer types.

CONCLUSION

An international questionnaire-based survey of patients with cancer, PCPs and CTSs has been developed and launched in 10 jurisdictions. ICBPM4 will help to further understand international differences in cancer survival by comparing time intervals and routes to cancer diagnosis.

摘要

目的

本文描述了国际癌症基准伙伴关系模块4调查(ICBPM4)中所使用的方法,该调查研究了10个司法管辖区内癌症诊断的时间间隔和途径。我们介绍了研究设计,包括定义和测量时间间隔、识别癌症患者、问卷开发、数据管理和分析。

设计与背景

ICBPM4调查的参与者招募基于每个司法管辖区的癌症登记处。问卷借鉴了以前的工具,并经过了认知测试和在三个司法管辖区的预试验过程,随后进行了标准化翻译和改编。数据分析侧重于比较各司法管辖区在诊断时间间隔和途径上的差异。

参与者

我们的目标是在每个司法管辖区选取200例有症状的乳腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌患者。患者通过直接接触或经由其初级保健医生(PCP)参与调查。对患者的初级保健医生和癌症治疗专家(CTS)进行调查,并应用“数据规则”来合并和协调相互矛盾的信息。在无法获得CTS信息的情况下,从治疗记录和数据库中获取审核信息。

主要结果

患者问卷的可靠性测试表明,四项内容的一致性为完全一致(κ=1),一项内容的一致性为高度一致(κ=0.8,95%CI 0.333至1)。符合条件患者的识别足以满足乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌的目标。英国和瑞典患者及初级保健医生的初始调查回复率与类似的已发表调查相当。所有癌症类型的数据收集于2016年初完成。

结论

已在10个司法管辖区开展并实施了一项基于问卷的针对癌症患者、初级保健医生和癌症治疗专家的国际调查。ICBPM4将通过比较癌症诊断的时间间隔和途径,有助于进一步了解癌症生存率的国际差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05f8/4964239/3feee7a92573/bmjopen2015009641f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验