Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, Centre for Neuroscience, Univ. of Alberta, 6-41 General Services Bldg., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2R3.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Mar;110(3):627-37. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01103.2010. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can be delivered over a nerve trunk or muscle belly and can generate contractions by activating motor (peripheral pathway) and sensory (central pathway) axons. In the present experiments, we compared the peripheral and central contributions to plantar flexion contractions evoked by stimulation over the tibial nerve vs. the triceps surae muscles. Generating contractions through central pathways follows Henneman's size principle, whereby low-threshold motor units are activated first, and this may have advantages for rehabilitation. Statistical analyses were performed on data from trials in which NMES was delivered to evoke 10-30% maximum voluntary torque 2-3 s into the stimulation (Time(1)). Two patterns of stimulation were delivered: 1) 20 Hz for 8 s; and 2) 20-100-20 Hz for 3-2-3 s. Torque and soleus electromyography were quantified at the beginning (Time(1)) and end (Time(2); 6-7 s into the stimulation) of each stimulation train. H reflexes (central pathway) and M waves (peripheral pathway) were quantified. Motor unit activity that was not time-locked to each stimulation pulse as an M wave or H reflex ("asynchronous" activity) was also quantified as a second measure of central recruitment. Torque was not different for stimulation over the nerve or the muscle. In contrast, M waves were approximately five to six times smaller, and H reflexes were approximately two to three times larger during NMES over the nerve vs. the muscle. Asynchronous activity increased by 50% over time, regardless of the stimulation location or pattern, and was largest during NMES over the muscle belly. Compared with NMES over the triceps surae muscles, NMES over the tibial nerve produced contractions with a relatively greater central contribution, and this may help reduce muscle atrophy and fatigue when NMES is used for rehabilitation.
神经肌肉电刺激 (NMES) 可以通过神经干或肌肉腹传递,通过激活运动 (周围通路) 和感觉 (中枢通路) 轴突来产生收缩。在本实验中,我们比较了通过刺激胫神经与刺激三头肌引起的足底屈肌收缩的周围和中枢贡献。通过中枢通路产生收缩遵循 Henneman 的大小原则,即首先激活低阈值运动单位,这可能对康复有优势。统计分析基于 NMES 刺激引发 10-30%最大自主扭矩 2-3 秒的数据进行 (Time(1))。两种刺激模式如下:1)20 Hz 持续 8 s;2)20-100-20 Hz 持续 3-2-3 s。在每次刺激序列的开始 (Time(1)) 和结束 (Time(2);刺激 6-7 秒后) 测量扭矩和比目鱼肌肌电图。量化 H 反射 (中枢通路) 和 M 波 (周围通路)。还量化了与每个刺激脉冲不同步的运动单位活动,作为中央募集的第二个度量,即 M 波或 H 反射的“异步”活动。与刺激肌肉相比,刺激神经时扭矩没有差异。相反,NMES 刺激神经时,M 波大约小 5-6 倍,H 反射大约大 2-3 倍。无论刺激位置或模式如何,异步活动随时间增加 50%,并且在刺激肌肉腹时最大。与刺激三头肌相比,刺激胫神经产生的收缩具有相对更大的中枢贡献,这可能有助于减少 NMES 用于康复时的肌肉萎缩和疲劳。