• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛初乳和 Bifivir 预防流感发作与疫苗接种的比较:一项流行病学、注册研究。

Prevention of flu episodes with colostrum and Bifivir compared with vaccination: an epidemiological, registry study.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Irvine3 Circulation/Vascular Labs & San Valentino Vascular Screening Project, G D'annunzio University, Chieti, Pescara, Italy.

出版信息

Panminerva Med. 2010 Dec;52(4):269-75.

PMID:21183886
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of colostrum (ARD Colostrum) in association with the immunomodulator Bifivir in the prevention of flu episodes compared with anti-flu vaccination. The registry groups included no prevention, vaccination, vaccination+immunomodulators, and immunomodulators only. Groups were comparable for age and sex distribution. In the group without prevention there were 8 major episodes and 12 minor episodes out of 34 subjects (8-12/34); in the vaccination group the respective figures were 8-13/38; in the group treated with a combination of vaccination and immunomodulators (ARD Colostrum + Bifivir) the figures were 4-9/33; and in the group treated with immunomodulators only there were 11 viral episodes (3-8) in 36 subjects. The episodes in the vaccination+immunomodulators and immunomodulators only groups were significantly lower compared with the other two groups (P<0.05). The number of episodes registered with the immunnomodulators was significantly lower than those observed in patients using vaccination or no prevention (P<0.05). The number of days of disease was higher in untreated controls compared to the groups treated with immunomodulators (P<0.05) and 2 times higher in the vaccination group compared to the same groups (P<0.05). The average relative costs were significantly lower (2.3 times) in the immunomodulators groups in comparison with the other groups (P<0.05). No problems concerning tolerability or side effects were observed during the study. Compliance was very good. In conclusion, the administration of immunomodulators is very cost effective and appears to be more effective than vaccination to prevent flu.

摘要

本研究旨在评估初乳(ARD 初乳)与免疫调节剂 Bifivir 联合用于预防流感发作的疗效,与流感疫苗接种进行比较。登记组包括无预防、疫苗接种、疫苗接种+免疫调节剂和仅免疫调节剂。各组在年龄和性别分布方面具有可比性。在无预防组中,34 名受试者中有 8 次主要发作和 12 次次要发作(8-12/34);疫苗接种组分别为 8-13/38;在联合使用疫苗接种和免疫调节剂(ARD 初乳+Bifivir)治疗的组中,数字为 4-9/33;而在仅使用免疫调节剂治疗的组中,36 名受试者中有 11 次病毒发作(3-8)。疫苗接种+免疫调节剂和仅免疫调节剂治疗组的发作次数明显低于其他两组(P<0.05)。免疫调节剂组的发作次数明显低于使用疫苗接种或无预防的患者(P<0.05)。未治疗对照组的疾病天数明显高于使用免疫调节剂治疗的组(P<0.05),且与相同组相比,疫苗接种组的疾病天数高 2 倍(P<0.05)。与其他组相比,免疫调节剂组的平均相对费用明显降低(2.3 倍)(P<0.05)。在研究期间未观察到与耐受性或副作用相关的问题。依从性非常好。总之,免疫调节剂的给药具有非常高的成本效益,并且似乎比疫苗接种更能有效预防流感。

相似文献

1
Prevention of flu episodes with colostrum and Bifivir compared with vaccination: an epidemiological, registry study.牛初乳和 Bifivir 预防流感发作与疫苗接种的比较:一项流行病学、注册研究。
Panminerva Med. 2010 Dec;52(4):269-75.
2
Prevention of influenza episodes with colostrum compared with vaccination in healthy and high-risk cardiovascular subjects: the epidemiologic study in San Valentino.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2007 Apr;13(2):130-6. doi: 10.1177/1076029606295957.
3
Antiviral drugs in influenza: an adjunct to vaccination in some situations.流感抗病毒药物:在某些情况下作为疫苗接种的辅助手段。
Prescrire Int. 2006 Feb;15(81):21-30.
4
Vaccination versus treatment of influenza in working adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在职成年人中流感疫苗接种与治疗的比较:一项成本效益分析。
Am J Med. 2005 Jan;118(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.044.
5
[Anti-influenza vaccination for active persons (25-64 years): a cost-benefit study].[针对活跃人群(25 - 64岁)的抗流感疫苗接种:一项成本效益研究]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1992;40(5):285-95.
6
Vaccination against pandemic influenza A/H1N1v in England: a real-time economic evaluation.英格兰大流行性流感 A/H1N1v 疫苗接种:实时经济评价。
Vaccine. 2010 Mar 11;28(12):2370-84. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.01.002. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
7
Effectiveness of influenza vaccination: a survey within the Italian Ministry of Health personnel.流感疫苗接种的有效性:意大利卫生部工作人员内部调查
Vaccine. 2006 Nov 10;24(44-46):6612-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.107. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
8
The efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccination among Thai elderly persons living in the community.流感疫苗对泰国社区老年人群的有效性和效果。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Feb;88(2):256-64.
9
[Cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination The Netherlands].[荷兰流感疫苗接种的成本效益]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Jan 11;141(2):93-7.
10
[Assessment of efficacy and economic impact of an influenza vaccination campaign in the personnel of a health care setting].[医疗机构人员流感疫苗接种活动的效果及经济影响评估]
Med Lav. 2005 Nov-Dec;96(6):483-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Chondroprotective effect of curcumin and lecithin complex in human chondrocytes stimulated by IL-1β via an anti-inflammatory mechanism.姜黄素与卵磷脂复合物通过抗炎机制对白细胞介素-1β刺激的人软骨细胞的软骨保护作用。
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Sep 18;28(2):547-553. doi: 10.1007/s10068-018-0470-6. eCollection 2019 Apr.