• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生保健诉求:公平决策框架及其在南非艾滋病治疗中的应用

Claims on health care: a decision-making framework for equity, with application to treatment for HIV/AIDS in South Africa.

机构信息

Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory, South Africa.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2011 Nov;26(6):464-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq081. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

DOI:10.1093/heapol/czq081
PMID:21186205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3199038/
Abstract

Trying to determine how best to allocate resources in health care is especially difficult when resources are severely constrained, as is the case in all developing countries. This is particularly true in South Africa currently where the HIV epidemic adds significantly to a health service already overstretched by the demands made upon it. This paper proposes a framework for determining how best to allocate scarce health care resources in such circumstances. This is based on communitarian claims. The basis of possible claims considered include: the need for health care, specified both as illness and capacity to benefit; whether or not claimants have personal responsibility in the conditions that have generated their health care need; relative deprivation or disadvantage; and the impact of services on the health of society and on the social fabric. Ways of determining these different claims in practice and the weights to be attached to them are also discussed. The implications for the treatment of HIV/AIDS in South Africa are spelt out.

摘要

在资源严重受限的情况下,例如所有发展中国家的情况,试图确定如何最好地分配医疗保健资源尤其困难。在南非,这种情况尤其如此,目前艾滋病毒的流行使得本已不堪重负的卫生服务系统雪上加霜。本文提出了一个在这种情况下确定如何最好地分配稀缺卫生保健资源的框架。这是基于社群主义的主张。所考虑的可能主张的基础包括:医疗保健的需求,既包括疾病,也包括受益能力;索赔人是否对导致其医疗保健需求的条件负有个人责任;相对剥夺或劣势;以及服务对社会健康和社会结构的影响。还讨论了在实践中确定这些不同主张的方法以及赋予它们的权重。阐述了在南非治疗艾滋病毒/艾滋病的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b448/3199038/b7e2034cde3a/czq081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b448/3199038/b7e2034cde3a/czq081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b448/3199038/b7e2034cde3a/czq081f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Claims on health care: a decision-making framework for equity, with application to treatment for HIV/AIDS in South Africa.卫生保健诉求:公平决策框架及其在南非艾滋病治疗中的应用
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Nov;26(6):464-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq081. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
2
Improving resource allocation decisions for health and HIV programmes in South Africa: Bioethical, cost-effectiveness and health diplomacy considerations.改善南非卫生和艾滋病毒规划的资源分配决策:生物伦理、成本效益和卫生外交考虑。
Glob Public Health. 2013;8(5):570-87. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.790461. Epub 2013 May 7.
3
Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: a descriptive study of KwaDukuza, South Africa.分配艾滋病毒/艾滋病资金:南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省德班市的描述性研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Jan;26(1):33-42. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq022. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
4
Tuberculosis结核病
5
Social health insurance: to each according to his needs; from each according to his means--but what might that mean?社会健康保险:按需分配;按劳分配——但这意味着什么呢?
Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(4):679-90. doi: 10.2190/HS.41.4.d.
6
The role of civil society in health policy making in South Africa: a review of the strategies adopted by the Treatment Action Campaign.南非民间社会在卫生政策制定中的作用:治疗行动运动所采用策略的综述
Afr J AIDS Res. 2017 Mar;16(1):57-64. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2017.1296874.
7
Equity in the use of antiretroviral treatment in the public health care system in urban South Africa.城市南非公共医疗体系中抗逆转录病毒治疗的公平性。
Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.016. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
8
Designing equitable antiretroviral allocation strategies in resource-constrained countries.在资源有限的国家设计公平的抗逆转录病毒药物分配策略。
PLoS Med. 2005 Feb;2(2):e50. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020050. Epub 2005 Feb 22.
9
Geographic patterns of deprivation in South Africa: informing health equity analyses and public resource allocation strategies.南非贫困状况的地理分布模式:为健康公平分析和公共资源分配策略提供信息。
Health Policy Plan. 2002 Dec;17 Suppl:30-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/17.suppl_1.30.
10
An ethical dilemma. Availability of antiretroviral therapy after clinical trials with HIV infected patients are ended.一个伦理困境。在针对HIV感染患者的临床试验结束后抗逆转录病毒疗法的可及性问题。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 22;314(7084):887-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7084.887.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of intensive care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: experience from South Africa.南非新冠肺炎住院患者重症监护的成本效益分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06081-4.
2
Equity in adherence to antiretroviral therapy among economically vulnerable adolescents living with HIV in Uganda.乌干达经济脆弱的艾滋病毒感染青少年在抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性方面的公平性。
AIDS Care. 2016 Mar;28 Suppl 2(sup2):83-91. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1176681.
3
IMPORTANCE OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA FOR PRIORITY SETTING OF HIV/AIDS INTERVENTIONS.

本文引用的文献

1
When to start antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings.在资源有限的环境中何时开始抗逆转录病毒治疗。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):157-66. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00138. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
2
Affordability--the forgotten criterion in health-care priority setting.可负担性——医疗保健优先事项设定中被遗忘的标准。
Health Econ. 2009 Apr;18(4):373-5. doi: 10.1002/hec.1450.
3
When to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy in low-resource settings: the Moroccan experience.在资源匮乏地区何时开始高效抗逆转录病毒治疗:摩洛哥的经验
艾滋病毒/艾滋病干预措施优先排序的多标准重要性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(6):390-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000039.
4
Equity in utilization of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-infected people in South Africa: a systematic review.南非艾滋病毒感染者抗逆转录病毒疗法使用情况的公平性:一项系统评价。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Aug 1;13:60. doi: 10.1186/s12939-014-0060-z.
5
Balancing efficiency, equity and feasibility of HIV treatment in South Africa - development of programmatic guidance.在南非平衡艾滋病毒治疗的效率、公平性和可行性——制定规划指导原则。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013 Oct 9;11(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-26.
6
Mapping of multiple criteria for priority setting of health interventions: an aid for decision makers.多标准健康干预措施优先级设定图:决策者的辅助工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec 13;12:454. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-454.
Antivir Ther. 2008;13(2):241-51.
4
When to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa? A South African cost-effectiveness study.在撒哈拉以南非洲地区何时开始高效抗逆转录病毒治疗?一项南非成本效益研究。
Antivir Ther. 2006;11(1):63-72.
5
Approaches to rationing antiretroviral treatment: ethical and equity implications.抗逆转录病毒治疗的配给方法:伦理与公平问题
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jul;83(7):541-7.
6
The antiretroviral rollout and drug-resistant HIV in Africa: insights from empirical data and theoretical models.非洲的抗逆转录病毒药物推广与耐药性艾滋病毒:来自实证数据和理论模型的见解
AIDS. 2005 Jan 3;19(1):1-14. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200501030-00001.
7
Barriers to better care for people with AIDS in developing countries.发展中国家为艾滋病患者提供更好护理的障碍。
BMJ. 2004 Nov 27;329(7477):1281-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7477.1281.
8
Communitarian claims and community capabilities: furthering priority setting?社群主义主张与社区能力:推进优先事项设定?
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):247-55. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.033.
9
The nature of procedural preferences for health-care rationing decisions.医疗资源分配决策中程序偏好的本质。
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Jan;60(2):223-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.04.036.
10
Outcomes after two years of providing antiretroviral treatment in Khayelitsha, South Africa.在南非开普敦凯伊利沙提供两年抗逆转录病毒治疗后的结果。
AIDS. 2004 Apr 9;18(6):887-95. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200404090-00006.