Suppr超能文献

听力障碍者有无听力补偿情况下的言语声音水平辨别。

Level discrimination of speech sounds by hearing-impaired individuals with and without hearing amplification.

机构信息

MRC Institute of Hearing Research (Scottish Section), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):391-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318202b620.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The current study was designed to see how hearing-impaired individuals judge level differences between speech sounds with and without hearing amplification. It was hypothesized that hearing aid compression should adversely affect the user's ability to judge level differences.

DESIGN

Thirty-eight hearing-impaired participants performed an adaptive tracking procedure to determine their level-discrimination thresholds for different word and sentence tokens, as well as speech-spectrum noise, with and without their hearing aids. Eight normal-hearing participants performed the same task for comparison.

RESULTS

Level discrimination for different word and sentence tokens was more difficult than the discrimination of stationary noises. Word level discrimination was significantly more difficult than sentence level discrimination. There were no significant differences, however, between mean performance with and without hearing aids and no correlations between performance and various hearing aid measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear difficulty in judging the level differences between words or sentences relative to differences between broadband noises, but this difficulty was found for both hearing-impaired and normal-hearing individuals and had no relation to hearing aid compression measures. The lack of a clear adverse effect of hearing aid compression on level discrimination is suggested to be due to the low effective compression ratios of currently fit hearing aids.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在观察听力受损个体如何判断有和无听力放大的语音之间的水平差异。研究假设助听器压缩会对使用者判断水平差异的能力产生不利影响。

设计

38 名听力受损参与者进行了自适应跟踪程序,以确定他们对不同单词和句子标记以及语音频谱噪声的水平辨别阈值,同时佩戴和不佩戴助听器。8 名正常听力参与者执行相同的任务进行比较。

结果

不同单词和句子标记的水平辨别比固定噪声更困难。单词水平辨别明显比句子水平辨别更困难。然而,没有发现使用和不使用助听器之间的平均性能存在显著差异,也没有发现性能与各种助听器测量值之间存在相关性。

结论

与宽带噪声相比,判断单词或句子之间的水平差异明显更困难,但这种困难既存在于听力受损个体中,也存在于正常听力个体中,且与助听器压缩测量值无关。助听器压缩对水平辨别没有明显的不利影响,这可能是由于当前适配的助听器的有效压缩比低。

相似文献

2
Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.双侧助听器的空间获益。
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):203-18. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819769c1.

引用本文的文献

3
Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech.语音增益的辨别。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519886684. doi: 10.1177/2331216519886684.
4
Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises.语音噪声中增益增量的判别。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518820220. doi: 10.1177/2331216518820220.
8
The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio.言语可听度的最小可觉差。
Trends Hear. 2015 Feb 12;19:2331216515572316. doi: 10.1177/2331216515572316.

本文引用的文献

3
The effects of hearing aid compression parameters on the short-term dynamic range of continuous speech.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):471-84. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/034).
10
Difference limen and recruitment.
AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1954 Nov;60(5):525-40. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1954.00720010540001.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验