Pfizer Global Research and Development, Department of Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
Curr Drug Metab. 2010 Nov;11(9):730-42. doi: 10.2174/138920010794328850.
While the oral exposure continues to be the major focus, the chemical space of recent drug discovery is apparently trending towards more hydrophilic libraries, due to toxicity and drug-interactions issues usually reported with lipophilic drugs. This trend may bring in challenges in optimizing the membrane permeability and thus the oral absorption of new chemical entities. It is now apparent that the influx transporters such as peptide transporter 1 (PepT1), organic-anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs), monocarboxylate transporters (MCT1) facilitate, while efflux pumps (e.g. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP)) limit oral absorption of drugs. This review will focus on intestinal transporters that may be targeted to achieve optimal clinical oral plasma exposure for hydrophilic and polar drugs. The structure, mechanism, structure-activity relationships and the clinical examples on the functional role of these transporters in the drug absorption was discussed. Physicochemical properties, lipophilicity and hydrogen-bonding ability, show good correlation with transport activity for efflux pumps. Although several attempts were made to describe the structural requirements based on pharmacophore modeling, lack of crystal structure of transporters impeded identification of definite properties for transporter affinity and favorable transport activity. Furthermore, very few substrate drug datasets are currently available for the influx transporters to derive any clear relationships. Unfortunately, gaps also exist in the translation of in vitro end points to the clinical relevance of the transporter(s) involved. However, it may be qualitatively generalized that targeting intestinal transporters are relevant for drugs with high solubility and/or low passive permeability i.e. a class of compounds identified as Class III and Class IV according to the Biopharmaceutic Classification System (BCS) and the Biopharmaceutic Drug Disposition Classification System (BDDCS). A careful considerations to oral dose based on the transporter clearance (V(max)/K(m)) capacity is needed in targeting a particular transporter. For example, low affinity and high capacity uptake transporters such as PEPT1 and MCT1 may be targeted for high oral dose drugs.
虽然口服暴露仍然是主要关注点,但由于脂溶性药物通常会引起毒性和药物相互作用问题,最近药物发现的化学空间显然趋于更亲水的文库。这种趋势可能会给新化学实体的膜通透性优化带来挑战,从而影响口服吸收。现在很明显,摄取转运体(如肽转运蛋白 1(PepT1)、有机阴离子转运多肽(OATPs)、单羧酸转运蛋白(MCT1))促进药物的吸收,而外排泵(如 P 糖蛋白(P-gp)、乳腺癌耐药蛋白(BCRP))限制药物的口服吸收。本综述将重点讨论可能被靶向以实现亲水和极性药物的最佳临床口服血浆暴露的肠道转运体。讨论了这些转运体在药物吸收中的结构、机制、结构-活性关系和临床作用。物理化学性质、亲脂性和氢键能力与外排泵的转运活性有很好的相关性。尽管已经尝试了几种描述基于药效团模型的结构要求的方法,但转运体的晶体结构缺乏阻碍了确定转运体亲和力和有利转运活性的明确特性。此外,目前用于流入转运体的底物药物数据集很少,无法得出任何明确的关系。不幸的是,在体外终点与所涉及的转运体的临床相关性之间也存在差距。然而,可以定性地概括,针对高溶解度和/或低被动通透性的药物靶向肠道转运体是相关的,即根据生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)和生物药剂学药物处置分类系统(BDDCS)确定的一类化合物为 III 类和 IV 类。在靶向特定转运体时,需要根据转运体清除率(Vmax/Km)能力仔细考虑口服剂量。例如,低亲和力和高容量摄取转运体,如 PepT1 和 MCT1,可能是高口服剂量药物的靶向目标。