Minerva Center and Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 52900, Israel.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 18;108(3):1007-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008404108. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
Current network models assume one type of links to define the relations between the network entities. However, many real networks can only be correctly described using two different types of relations. Connectivity links that enable the nodes to function cooperatively as a network and dependency links that bind the failure of one network element to the failure of other network elements. Here we present an analytical framework for studying the robustness of networks that include both connectivity and dependency links. We show that a synergy exists between the failure of connectivity and dependency links that leads to an iterative process of cascading failures that has a devastating effect on the network stability. We present exact analytical results for the dramatic change in the network behavior when introducing dependency links. For a high density of dependency links, the network disintegrates in a form of a first-order phase transition, whereas for a low density of dependency links, the network disintegrates in a second-order transition. Moreover, opposed to networks containing only connectivity links where a broader degree distribution results in a more robust network, when both types of links are present a broad degree distribution leads to higher vulnerability.
目前的网络模型假设只有一种类型的链接来定义网络实体之间的关系。然而,许多真实网络只能使用两种不同类型的关系来正确描述。连通性链接使节点能够作为网络协同工作,而依赖性链接则将一个网络元素的故障绑定到其他网络元素的故障。在这里,我们提出了一个分析框架来研究包括连通性和依赖性链接的网络的鲁棒性。我们表明,连通性和依赖性链接的故障之间存在协同作用,导致级联故障的迭代过程,这对网络稳定性产生了破坏性影响。我们为引入依赖性链接时网络行为的剧烈变化提供了精确的解析结果。对于高密度的依赖性链接,网络以一阶相变的形式瓦解,而对于低密度的依赖性链接,网络以二阶相变的形式瓦解。此外,与仅包含连通性链接的网络相反,在这些网络中,更广泛的度分布导致更健壮的网络,而当存在这两种类型的链接时,更广泛的度分布会导致更高的脆弱性。