• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估农业生态效率:数据包络分析方法。

Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach.

机构信息

Universidad de Valencia, Dpto. Economía Aplicada II, Avda. dels Tarongers s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr;92(4):1154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025. Epub 2010 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025
PMID:21193265
Abstract

This paper assesses farming eco-efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) techniques. Eco-efficiency scores at both farm and environmental pressure-specific levels are computed for a sample of Spanish farmers operating in the rain-fed agricultural system of Campos County. The determinants of eco-efficiency are then studied using truncated regression and bootstrapping techniques. We contribute to previous literature in this field of research by including information on slacks in the assessment of the potential environmental pressure reductions in a DEA framework. Our results reveal that farmers are quite eco-inefficient, with very few differences emerging among specific environmental pressures. Moreover, eco-inefficiency is closely related to technical inefficiencies in the management of inputs. Regarding the determinants of eco-efficiency, farmers benefiting from agri-environmental programs as well as those with university education are found to be more eco-efficient. Concerning the policy implications of these results, public expenditure in agricultural extension and farmer training could be of some help to promote integration between farming and the environment. Furthermore, Common Agricultural Policy agri-environmental programs are an effective policy to improve eco-efficiency, although some doubts arise regarding their cost-benefit balance.

摘要

本文使用数据包络分析(DEA)技术评估农业生态效率。为坎波斯县雨养农业系统中的西班牙农民样本计算了农场和环境压力特定层面的生态效率得分。然后使用截断回归和自举技术研究了生态效率的决定因素。我们通过在 DEA 框架中评估潜在环境压力降低时包含有关松弛的信息,为该研究领域的先前文献做出了贡献。我们的结果表明,农民的生态效率非常低,不同特定环境压力之间几乎没有差异。此外,生态效率与投入管理中的技术效率密切相关。关于生态效率的决定因素,我们发现受益于农业环境计划以及接受过大学教育的农民的生态效率更高。关于这些结果的政策含义,农业推广和农民培训方面的公共支出可能有助于促进农业与环境的融合。此外,共同农业政策的农业环境计划是提高生态效率的有效政策,尽管对其成本效益平衡存在一些疑问。

相似文献

1
Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach.评估农业生态效率:数据包络分析方法。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr;92(4):1154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
2
Assessing eco-efficiency and the determinants of horticultural family-farming in southeast Spain.评估西班牙东南部园艺家庭农场的生态效率及其决定因素。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Dec 15;204(Pt 1):594-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.037. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
3
Benchmarking environmental and operational parameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy farms.通过生态效率标准对奶牛场的环境和运营参数进行基准测试。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Apr 15;409(10):1786-98. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.013. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
4
Eco-efficient approaches to land management: a case for increased integration of crop and animal production systems.土地管理的生态高效方法:加强作物与畜牧生产系统整合的实例
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 12;363(1491):517-25. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2167.
5
An approach to holistically assess (dairy) farm eco-efficiency by combining Life Cycle Analysis with Data Envelopment Analysis models and methodologies.一种通过将生命周期分析与数据包络分析模型及方法相结合来全面评估(奶牛)场生态效率的方法。
Animal. 2016 Nov;10(11):1899-1910. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000707. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Evaluating the Sustainable Intensification of arable farms.评估耕地农场的可持续集约化发展。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Mar 1;150:288-298. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
Evaluating farm performance using agri-environmental indicators: recent experiences for nitrogen management in The Netherlands.利用农业环境指标评估农场绩效:荷兰氮管理的近期经验。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Feb;82(3):363-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.11.021. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
8
Eco-efficiency in contaminated land management in Finland: barriers and development needs.芬兰污染土地管理中的生态效率:障碍与发展需求
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1715-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.002. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
9
Assessing the environmental performance of English arable and livestock holdings using data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN).利用来自农场会计数据网络(FADN)的数据评估英国耕地和畜牧业农场的环境绩效。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Mar;92(3):902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.051. Epub 2010 Nov 13.
10
[Eco-efficiency change and its driving factors in Tongling City of Anhui Province].[安徽省铜陵市生态效率变化及其驱动因素]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Feb;22(2):460-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing potential reductions of agricultural GHG in countries with different land productivities: Long-term integrated efficiency in DEA hybrid meta-frontier model.评估不同土地生产力国家农业温室气体减排潜力:DEA混合元前沿模型中的长期综合效率
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 4;20(2):e0315571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315571. eCollection 2025.
2
Non-farm income and environmental efficiency of the farmers: Evidence from India.农民的非农收入与环境效率:来自印度的证据
Heliyon. 2024 May 7;10(10):e30804. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30804. eCollection 2024 May 30.
3
Does contract farming enhance farm efficiency? A case of wheat growers of Haryana, India.
订单农业能提高农场效率吗?以印度哈里亚纳邦的小麦种植者为例。
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 7;9(4):e15222. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15222. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Analysis of the Spatial Differentiation and Promotion Potential for Agricultural Eco-Efficiency-Evidence of Pollution's Strong Disposability.农业生态效率的空间分异与提升潜力分析——污染强排放的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2397. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032397.
5
Holistic Sustainability Assessment of Riparian Buffer Designs: Evaluation of Alternative Buffer Policy Scenarios Integrating Stream Water Quality and Costs.河岸缓冲带设计的整体可持续性评估:整合溪流水质与成本的替代缓冲政策情景评估
Sustainability. 2022 Sep 27;14(19):1-33. doi: 10.3390/su141912278.
6
Determining the Efficiency of the Sponge City Construction Pilots in China Based on the DEA-Malmquist Model.基于 DEA-Malmquist 模型的中国海绵城市建设试点效率研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;19(18):11195. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811195.
7
Conflict or Coordination? Spatiotemporal Coupling of Urban Population-Land Spatial Patterns and Ecological Efficiency.冲突还是协调?城市人口-土地空间格局与生态效率的时空耦合。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 17;10:890175. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.890175. eCollection 2022.
8
Evaluation of Tourism Development Efficiency and Spatial Spillover Effect Based on EBM Model: The Case of Hainan Island, China.基于EBM模型的旅游发展效率及空间溢出效应评估——以中国海南岛为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 22;19(7):3755. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073755.
9
The relationship between income and assets in farms and context of sustainable development.农场的收入与资产关系及其与可持续发展的背景。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0265128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265128. eCollection 2022.
10
What drives low-carbon agriculture? The experience of farms from the Wielkopolska region in Poland.什么推动了低碳农业?波兰大波兰地区农场的经验。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):18641-18652. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17022-3. Epub 2021 Oct 25.