• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农场的收入与资产关系及其与可持续发展的背景。

The relationship between income and assets in farms and context of sustainable development.

机构信息

Department of Macroeconomics and Agricultural Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0265128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265128. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0265128
PMID:35286338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8920205/
Abstract

The objective of this paper is to identify the relationship between farm income and assets within the European Union (EU) in the context of economic and environmental sustainable development. The scientific context is connected to economic theory (the recognition of the nature of such a relationship, as well as the determination of whether sustainable development acts as a stimulant or destimulant under these conditions). The Farm Accounting Data Network system was employed in the article. The econometric models were estimated by panel data based on the reported results of the farms operations in EU member states for the period of 2004-2018. Accordingly, the relationship between income and assets is positive and statistically significant, but not very clear in the group of surveyed farms. Moreover, economic sustainability was found to positively influences the relationship between income and assets. In contrast, the relationship between incomes and assets was weakened. The situation is brought about by the intrinsic growth in the value of the land, as well as by the growing importance of non-productive assets. Thus, farmers in EU countries are becoming wealthier in terms of the value of their assets but, this is not reflected directly in their income. The reason is the growing importance of environmental and social functions in the agriculture the European Union. Greater skills in asset management at farm level are, therefore, required to mitigate the situation.

摘要

本文旨在探讨欧盟(EU)范围内农场收入与资产之间的关系,以实现经济和环境的可持续发展。该研究的科学背景与经济理论相关(即认识到这种关系的本质,以及在这些条件下可持续发展是刺激还是抑制因素)。本文使用了农场会计数据网络系统。根据欧盟成员国 2004 年至 2018 年的农场运营报告结果,采用面板数据对计量经济学模型进行了估计。结果表明,收入和资产之间存在正相关关系,且在统计上显著,但在调查农场群体中并不十分明显。此外,经济可持续性对收入和资产之间的关系具有积极影响。相反,收入和资产之间的关系被削弱了。这种情况是由土地价值的内在增长以及非生产性资产的重要性不断提高所导致的。因此,欧盟国家的农民在资产价值方面变得更加富有,但这并没有直接反映在他们的收入上。原因在于,在欧盟的农业中,环境和社会功能的重要性日益增加。因此,需要在农场层面上提高资产管理技能,以缓解这种情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5126/8920205/0ebbbb1667d1/pone.0265128.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5126/8920205/ddafd0b9ee0e/pone.0265128.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5126/8920205/0ebbbb1667d1/pone.0265128.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5126/8920205/ddafd0b9ee0e/pone.0265128.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5126/8920205/0ebbbb1667d1/pone.0265128.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The relationship between income and assets in farms and context of sustainable development.农场的收入与资产关系及其与可持续发展的背景。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0265128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265128. eCollection 2022.
2
Changes in productivity and profitability of wool-growing farms that follow recommendations from agricultural and veterinary studies.遵循农业和兽医研究建议的养羊农场的生产力和盈利能力变化。
Aust Vet J. 1997 Oct;75(10):726-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1997.tb12256.x.
3
Overinvestment in selected Central and Eastern European countries: Production and economic effects.部分中东欧国家过度投资:生产与经济效应。
PLoS One. 2021 May 7;16(5):e0251394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251394. eCollection 2021.
4
Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices among Farmers in Kentucky, USA.美国肯塔基州农民对可持续农业实践的采用。
Environ Manage. 2018 Dec;62(6):1060-1072. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1109-3. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
5
Sustainability assessment of different land tenure farming systems in tea farming: The effect of decisional and structural variables.不同土地权属种植制度在茶园中的可持续性评估:决策和结构变量的影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2021 Jul;17(4):814-834. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4379. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
6
Influence of livelihood assets, experienced shocks and perceived risks on smallholder coffee farming practices in Peru.秘鲁生计资产、经历的冲击和感知风险对小农户咖啡种植实践的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jul 15;242:496-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.101. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
Organic Farming as an Alternative Maintenance Strategy in the Opinion of Farmers from Natura 2000 Areas.有机农业作为一种替代维护策略,在 Natura 2000 地区农民的观点中。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7):3793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073793.
8
Farm to Fork strategy and restrictions on the use of chemical inputs: Impacts on the various types of farming and territories of Italy.从农场到餐桌战略和化学投入物使用限制:对意大利各种类型农业和地区的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 1;810:152259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152259. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
9
Member commitment in farmers' cooperatives in China: The role of contractual and relational governance mechanisms.中国农民合作社成员的承诺:契约和关系治理机制的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 27;18(7):e0288925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288925. eCollection 2023.
10
Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Banana Farm Production: A Study from the Sindh Region of Pakistan.香蕉农场生产中可持续农业实践的采用:来自巴基斯坦信德省的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 25;17(10):3714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103714.

本文引用的文献

1
The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers.气候驱动的农业前沿的环境后果。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0228305. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228305. eCollection 2020.
2
Circular economy and the matter of integrated resources.循环经济与资源整合问题
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 1;689:963-969. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.449. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
3
Prioritizing options for multi-objective agricultural development through the Positive Deviance approach.通过正向偏离方法优先选择多目标农业发展方案。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 25;14(2):e0212926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212926. eCollection 2019.
4
Sustainability of common pool resources.公共池塘资源的可持续性。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0170981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170981. eCollection 2017.
5
Assessing farming eco-efficiency: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach.评估农业生态效率:数据包络分析方法。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Apr;92(4):1154-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.025. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
6
Measuring agricultural sustainability in terms of efficiency: the case of Dutch sugar beet growers.从效率角度衡量农业可持续性:以荷兰甜菜种植者为例。
J Environ Manage. 2002 Sep;66(1):9-17. doi: 10.1006/jema.2002.0578.