Gulhane Military Academy of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Turkey.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Mar;41(3):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.11.029. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
The small saphenous vein (SSV) lies in close relationship with sural nerve and is at risk of damage during surgery or vein ablation procedures on this vein. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of puncture site for SSV endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) on the rate of post-operative sural nerve injury.
Randomised controlled study.
Sixty patients with isolated SSV varicose veins (68 limbs) were randomised into two groups. All patients were treated with endovenous laser ablation procedures using radial fibres and a 1470 nm diode laser. In Group 1, SSVs were canulated from lateral malleolar part of the SSV. In Group 2, SSVs were canulated in the mid-calf. EVLA procedures were performed by using 12 W energy and 70 J cm⁻¹ LEED (linear endovenous energy density). Local pain, ecchymosis, induration and paraesthesia in treated regions, vein diameter, treated vein length, tumescent anaesthesia volume, delivered energy were recorded. Follow-up visits were arranged on the 2nd post-operative day, 7th day, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th months.
The mean SSV diameters at sapheno-popliteal junction (SPJ) and calf levels were Group 1 SPJ: 6.6 S.D. 1.2 mm, Calf: 5.1 S.D. 1.1 mm, and Group 2 SPJ: 6.8 S.D. 1.6 mm, Calf: 4.9 S.D. 1.3 mm. Adverse events after treatment were 1 patient with induration, 3 with ecchymosis and 6 minimal paraesthesia in Group 1 (malleolar) and 1 local pain, 4 minimal ecchymosis or induration and 1 paraesthesia in Group 2 (mid-calf). In Group 1 in two patients the paraesthesia lasted 2 months and then resolved spontaneously. In the remaining four patients' paraesthesia resolved in less than 1 month without treatment. In Group 2 paraesthesia resolved spontaneously in two weeks. Induration, ecchymosis and local pain also resolved in less than 2 weeks in both groups. There was no recanalisation or reflux in the treated SSV of either group during the follow-up period.
Treatment of the SSV by endovenous laser ablation using a 1470 nm laser and a radial fibre is safe and effective. Puncturing the vein at mid-calf level causes less post-operative nerve injury without affecting the recanalisation rates.
小隐静脉(SSV)与腓肠神经关系密切,在该静脉的手术或静脉消融过程中存在损伤风险。本研究旨在比较 SSV 腔内激光消融(EVLA)时穿刺部位对术后腓肠神经损伤发生率的影响。
随机对照研究。
60 例孤立性 SSV 静脉曲张患者(68 条肢体)随机分为两组。所有患者均采用 1470nm 二极管激光和径向光纤进行腔内激光消融治疗。在第 1 组中,SSV 从 SSV 的外踝部分进行插管。在第 2 组中,SSV 在小腿中段进行插管。采用 12W 能量和 70Jcm⁻¹ LEED(线性静脉内能量密度)进行 EVLA 操作。记录治疗区域的局部疼痛、瘀斑、硬结和感觉异常、静脉直径、治疗静脉长度、肿胀麻醉量、输送能量。在术后第 2 天、第 7 天、第 1、2、3 和 6 个月安排随访。
第 1 组 SSV 在隐股交界处(SPJ)和小腿水平的平均直径为 SPJ:6.6S.D.1.2mm,小腿:5.1S.D.1.1mm,第 2 组 SPJ:6.8S.D.1.6mm,小腿:4.9S.D.1.3mm。治疗后不良事件为第 1 组 1 例硬结,3 例瘀斑,6 例轻度感觉异常(外踝),第 2 组 1 例局部疼痛,4 例轻度瘀斑或硬结,1 例感觉异常(小腿中段)。第 1 组中有 2 例患者的感觉异常持续了 2 个月,然后自行缓解。其余 4 例患者的感觉异常在 1 个月内未经治疗自行缓解。第 2 组中,2 周内感觉异常自行缓解。两组的硬结、瘀斑和局部疼痛也在 2 周内缓解。在随访期间,两组治疗后的 SSV 均无再通或反流。
使用 1470nm 激光和径向光纤进行 SSV 腔内激光消融治疗是安全有效的。在小腿中段穿刺静脉可减少术后神经损伤,而不会影响再通率。