Chiba Cancer Center, 666-2 Nitona-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Chiba City, Chiba, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jan;41(1):2-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyq211.
Most clinical pathways in treating cancers in Japan are based on individual physician's personal experiences rather than on an empirical analysis of clinical data such as benchmark comparison with other hospitals. Therefore, these pathways are far from being standardized. By comparing detailed clinical data from five cancer centers, we have observed various differences among hospitals. By conducting benchmark analyses, providing detailed feedback to the participating hospitals and by repeating the benchmark a year later, we strive to develop more standardized clinical pathways for the treatment of cancers. The Cancer Quality Initiative was launched in 2007 by five cancer centers. Using diagnosis procedure combination data, the member hospitals benchmarked their pre-operative and post-operative length of stays, the duration of antibiotics administrations and the post-operative fasting duration for gastric, colon and rectal cancers. The benchmark was conducted by disclosing hospital identities and performed using 2007 and 2008 data. In the 2007 benchmark, substantial differences were shown among five hospitals in the treatment of gastric, colon and rectal cancers. After providing the 2007 results to the participating hospitals and organizing several brainstorming discussions, significant improvements were observed in the 2008 data study. The benchmark analysis of clinical data is extremely useful in promoting more standardized care and, thus in improving the quality of cancer treatment in Japan. By repeating the benchmark analyses, we can offer truly clinical evidence-based higher quality standardized cancer treatment to our patients.
日本的大多数癌症治疗临床路径都是基于个别医生的个人经验,而不是基于对临床数据的实证分析,例如与其他医院的基准比较。因此,这些路径远未标准化。通过比较五个癌症中心的详细临床数据,我们观察到医院之间存在各种差异。通过进行基准分析,向参与医院提供详细反馈,并在一年后重复基准分析,我们努力为癌症治疗开发更标准化的临床路径。癌症质量倡议于 2007 年由五个癌症中心发起。使用诊断程序组合数据,成员医院对胃癌、结肠癌和直肠癌的术前和术后住院时间、抗生素使用时间和术后禁食时间进行了基准测试。基准测试是通过公开医院身份并使用 2007 年和 2008 年的数据进行的。在 2007 年的基准测试中,五家医院在胃癌、结肠癌和直肠癌的治疗方面存在显著差异。在向参与医院提供 2007 年的结果并组织了几次头脑风暴讨论后,在 2008 年的数据研究中观察到了显著的改进。临床数据的基准分析在促进更标准化的护理方面非常有用,从而提高了日本癌症治疗的质量。通过重复基准分析,我们可以为我们的患者提供真正基于临床证据的高质量标准化癌症治疗。