Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc., 1787 Sentry Parkway West, Building 18, Suite 400, Blue Bell, PA 19422, USA.
Vaccine. 2011 Sep 9;29(39):6771-80. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.057. Epub 2011 Jan 1.
Electroporation (EP) of either muscle or skin has proven to be an efficient method for increasing DNA-based vaccine delivery and immunogenicity in small and large animals. Previous comparative studies in large animals suggest that intramuscular (i.m.) DNA EP delivery appears to favor cellular immunity, while intradermal (i.d.) EP delivery may favor humoral immunity. While current EP devices are primarily designed either for i.m. or i.d. delivery, we developed a novel prototype Dual-Depth Device (DDD) for EP-mediated simultaneous i.d. and i.m. delivery of DNA-based vaccines with an attempt to elicit superior antibody and cellular immune responses. We performed comparisons of DDD EP delivery with standard i.d. EP, standard i.m. EP, and combined delivery of i.d. and i.m. EP at separate sites, for the ability to induce antigen-specific immune responses. In a guinea pig model using a SynCon™ DNA vaccine encoding the influenza virus H5 hemaglutinin (H5HA), vaccination via DDD or combined delivery induced higher antibody titers than via either i.d. or i.m. delivery alone. In a mouse model using a DNA vaccine encoding the nucleoprotein (NP) of influenza H1N1, the resulting trend of antibody responses was similar to that detected in guinea pig study. Importantly, cellular immune responses in the DDD or combined delivery groups were significantly stronger than that in either i.d. or i.m. delivery groups. We conclude that EP-mediated DNA-based vaccine delivery to both skin and muscle is superior to delivery to either tissue alone for induction of antigen-specific antibody and cellular immunity.
电穿孔(EP)无论是肌肉还是皮肤已被证明是一种有效的方法,用于增加基于 DNA 的疫苗接种和免疫原性的小型和大型动物。以前的比较研究表明,在大型动物中肌肉内(i.m.)DNA EP 给药似乎有利于细胞免疫,而皮内(i.d.)EP 给药可能有利于体液免疫。虽然目前的 EP 设备主要是为 i.m. 或 i.d. 设计的,但我们开发了一种新型的双深度装置(DDD),用于 EP 介导的基于 DNA 的疫苗的皮内和肌肉内同时给药,试图引发更好的抗体和细胞免疫反应。我们进行了 DDD EP 给药与标准皮内 EP、标准肌肉内 EP 以及皮内和肌肉内分别给药的联合给药的比较,以评估其诱导抗原特异性免疫反应的能力。在豚鼠模型中,使用编码流感病毒 H5 血凝素(H5HA)的 SynCon™DNA 疫苗,通过 DDD 或联合给药接种比单独皮内或肌肉内给药诱导更高的抗体滴度。在使用编码流感 H1N1 核蛋白(NP)的 DNA 疫苗的小鼠模型中,抗体反应的趋势与豚鼠研究中检测到的相似。重要的是,DDD 或联合给药组的细胞免疫反应明显强于皮内或肌肉内单独给药组。我们得出结论,EP 介导的基于 DNA 的疫苗接种到皮肤和肌肉均优于单独接种到任何一种组织,以诱导抗原特异性抗体和细胞免疫。