• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.器官移植中肝脏获取的地理不公平性。
Transplantation. 2011 Feb 27;91(4):479-86. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182066275.
2
Role of Patient Factors and Practice Patterns in Determining Access to Liver Waitlist.患者因素和实践模式在确定获得肝移植候补名单中的作用。
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jul;15(7):1836-42. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13301. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
Sex Disparity in Liver Transplant and Access to Living Donation.性别差异与肝移植和活体捐赠机会
JAMA Surg. 2021 Nov 1;156(11):1010-1017. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3586.
4
The extent and predictors of waiting time geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.美国肾移植中等待时间的地域差异的程度和预测因素。
Transplantation. 2014 May 27;97(10):1049-57. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000438623.89310.dc.
5
Use of living donor liver transplantation varies with the availability of deceased donor liver transplantation.使用活体供肝移植的情况因可供使用的尸体供肝移植而异。
Liver Transpl. 2012 Feb;18(2):160-5. doi: 10.1002/lt.22455.
6
HCC patients suffer less from geographic differences in organ availability.HCC 患者在器官可及性方面受到的地域差异影响较小。
Am J Transplant. 2013 Nov;13(11):2989-95. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12441. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
7
Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End-Stage Liver Disease Patients.社会人口统计学因素对终末期肝病患者等待移植名单和移植后生存的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2017 Nov;17(11):2879-2889. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14421. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation.种族和民族在获得肝移植方面的差异。
Liver Transpl. 2010 Sep;16(9):1033-40. doi: 10.1002/lt.22108.
9
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.利用优化邻域改善肝脏分配
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):350-359. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001505.

引用本文的文献

1
Update on Organ Allocation and Liver Transplantation.器官分配与肝移植的最新进展
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2025 Jul;21(7):424-430.
2
Quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma-A critical review.肝细胞癌的医疗质量——一项批判性综述
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Dec 11;9(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000595. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
3
Inconsistent values and algorithmic fairness: a review of organ allocation priority systems in the United States.不一致的值和算法公平性:美国器官分配优先级系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 17;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01116-x.
4
A narrative review: predicting liver transplant graft survival using artificial intelligence modeling.一篇叙述性综述:使用人工智能模型预测肝移植移植物存活情况
Front Transplant. 2024 May 13;3:1378378. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1378378. eCollection 2024.
5
Liver volumetric and anatomic assessment in living donor liver transplantation: The role of modern imaging and artificial intelligence.活体肝移植中的肝脏容积和解剖评估:现代影像学与人工智能的作用
World J Transplant. 2023 Dec 18;13(6):290-298. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i6.290.
6
Quantitative methods for optimizing patient outcomes in liver transplantation.肝移植中优化患者预后的定量方法。
Liver Transpl. 2024 Mar 1;30(3):311-320. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000325. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
7
Center expansion of liver transplants using donation after circulatory death organs is associated with reduced overall waitlist mortality.使用循环死亡器官进行肝移植的中心扩张与降低整体候补名单死亡率有关。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14960. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14960. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
8
Is hepatic resection always a better choice than radiofrequency ablation for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma regardless of age and tumor size?对于单发肝细胞癌,无论年龄和肿瘤大小如何,肝切除术是否总是优于射频消融?
Biomol Biomed. 2023 Jul 3;23(4):705-717. doi: 10.17305/bb.2022.8507.
9
Heterogeneous donor circles for fair liver transplant allocation.异体供者肝移植公平分配的环。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Mar;27(1):20-45. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09602-7. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
10
Travel for Transplantation: A Review of Domestic and International Travel for Liver Transplantation in the United States.移植相关旅行:美国肝移植国内外旅行综述
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2021 Dec 7;18(6):292-296. doi: 10.1002/cld.1151. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Location, Location, Location.位置,位置,位置。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Oct;9(10):2207-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02835.x.
2
Geographic variation in organ availability is responsible for disparities in liver transplantation between Hispanics and Caucasians.器官可获得性的地理差异是西班牙裔和白种人在肝移植方面存在差异的原因。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2113-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02744.x. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
3
Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas.农村和城市地区居民的实体器官等待名单登记率、移植率和生存率。
JAMA. 2008 Jan 9;299(2):202-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2007.50.
4
Perceived transparency and fairness of the organ allocation system and willingness to donate organs: a national study.器官分配系统的感知透明度与公平性以及器官捐赠意愿:一项全国性研究。
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jul;7(7):1778-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01848.x. Epub 2007 May 25.
5
Geographic differences in event rates by model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分的事件发生率的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2006 Oct;6(10):2470-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01508.x.
6
Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.与肝移植失败相关的特征:供体风险指数的概念
Am J Transplant. 2006 Apr;6(4):783-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x.
7
MELD and prediction of post-liver transplantation survival.终末期肝病模型(MELD)与肝移植术后生存预测
Liver Transpl. 2006 Mar;12(3):440-7. doi: 10.1002/lt.20721.
8
The economic impact of MELD on liver transplant centers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)对肝移植中心的经济影响。
Am J Transplant. 2005 Sep;5(9):2297-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01025.x.
9
The survival benefit of liver transplantation.肝移植的生存获益。
Am J Transplant. 2005 Feb;5(2):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00703.x.
10
Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis.终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统下用于尸体供肝移植的扩大标准供体移植物:一项决策分析
Liver Transpl. 2004 Dec;10(12):1468-75. doi: 10.1002/lt.20304.

器官移植中肝脏获取的地理不公平性。

Geographic inequity in access to livers for transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2011 Feb 27;91(4):479-86. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182066275.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0b013e3182066275
PMID:21200366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3772346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation offers life-saving therapy for patients with decompensated liver disease or T2 hepatocellular carcinomas. In the United States, deceased donor livers are primarily allocated by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score within each of the country's more than 50 donation service areas (DSAs). Variation in DSA size, population, and organ availability have engendered concern that unequal access to deceased donor livers across DSAs contributes to geographic variability in outcome.

METHODS

To determine the extent to which DSA variability in organ availability correlated with combined waitlist and posttransplant mortality, we analyzed retrospectively national waitlist and posttransplant data for a 7-year period after implementation of the current MELD-based allocation system.

RESULTS

Marked variation among DSAs was evident in death rate (3.3-fold), transplant rate (20-fold), and mean transplant MELD (>10 points). Death rate correlated with organ availability was assessed by transplant rate and transplant MELD. DSAs with low organ availability included the country's largest cities, had more new listings per capita, larger waitlists, more transplant centers per DSA, and a higher proportion of black and Asian patients. DSAs of organ shortage were also characterized by more frequent dual listing at another transplant center, more living donor liver transplants, and increased average length of the transplant admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographic differences in deceased donor organ availability contribute to variation in overall death rate of liver transplant patients, shape the clinical practice of transplant, and influence the resources consumed per transplant. Geographic variation in organ access results primarily from rates of listing rather than donation. Our findings highlight the need to restructure organ distribution areas to achieve equal access to deceased donor livers for transplantation in the United States.

摘要

背景

肝移植为失代偿性肝病或 T2 肝细胞癌患者提供了挽救生命的治疗方法。在美国,超过 50 个供体服务区域(DSA)中的每个区域都主要根据模型预测终末期肝病评分(MELD)分配已故供体的肝脏。DSA 大小、人口和器官可用性的差异引起了人们的关注,即 DSAs 之间对已故供体肝脏的获取不平等可能导致结果的地理差异。

方法

为了确定器官可用性的 DSA 变异性与联合等候名单和移植后死亡率之间的相关性程度,我们回顾性地分析了当前基于 MELD 的分配系统实施后 7 年的全国等候名单和移植后数据。

结果

DSA 之间明显存在死亡率(3.3 倍)、移植率(20 倍)和平均移植 MELD(超过 10 分)的差异。通过移植率和移植 MELD 评估死亡率与器官可用性的相关性。器官可用性低的 DSA 包括该国最大的城市,人均新登记人数更多,等候名单更大,DSA 内的移植中心更多,黑人和亚洲患者的比例更高。器官短缺的 DSA 还具有以下特征:在另一个移植中心更频繁地双重登记、更多的活体供肝移植以及平均移植住院时间延长。

结论

已故供体器官可用性的地理差异导致肝移植患者总体死亡率的变化,塑造了移植的临床实践,并影响了每例移植的资源消耗。器官获取的地理差异主要源于登记率而不是捐赠率。我们的发现强调需要重新构建器官分配区域,以在美国实现平等获取已故供体肝脏进行移植。