• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing learning and memory in pigs.评估猪的学习和记忆能力。
Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):151-73. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
2
Cognitive testing of pigs (Sus scrofa) in translational biobehavioral research.猪(Sus scrofa)在转化生物行为研究中的认知测试。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):437-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.05.004. Epub 2010 May 27.
3
Performance of conventional pigs and Göttingen miniature pigs in a spatial holeboard task: effects of the putative muscarinic cognition impairer Biperiden.常规猪和哥廷根小型猪在空间洞板任务中的表现:拟胆碱能认知损伤剂比哌立登的影响。
Behav Brain Funct. 2013 Jan 10;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-9-4.
4
Sensorimotor developmental factors influencing the performance of laboratory rodents on learning and memory.影响实验鼠在学习和记忆方面表现的感觉运动发育因素。
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Dec 16;375:112140. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112140. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
5
The appetitively motivated "cognitive" holeboard: a family of complex spatial discrimination tasks for assessing learning and memory.有动机的“认知”洞板:一系列用于评估学习和记忆的复杂空间辨别任务。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):379-403. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
6
Judgement bias in pigs is independent of performance in a spatial holeboard task and conditional discrimination learning.猪的判断偏差与空间洞板任务及条件性辨别学习中的表现无关。
Anim Cogn. 2017 Jul;20(4):739-753. doi: 10.1007/s10071-017-1095-5. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Assessing pig body language: agreement and consistency between pig farmers, veterinarians, and animal activists.评估猪的肢体语言:养猪户、兽医和动物活动家之间的一致性和共识。
J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3652-65. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4691. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
A review of behavioral methods for the evaluation of cognitive performance in animal models: Current techniques and links to human cognition.行为方法在评估动物模型认知性能中的应用综述:当前技术与人认知的联系。
Physiol Behav. 2022 Feb 1;244:113652. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113652. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
9
Effects of fluoxetine on hippocampal-dependent and hippocampal-independent learning tasks.氟西汀对海马体依赖性和海马体非依赖性学习任务的影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2007 Sep;18(5-6):507-13. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3282ee2a91.
10
Learning about cognition risk with the radial-arm maze in the developmental neurotoxicology battery.在发育神经毒理学试验组合中利用放射状臂迷宫了解认知风险。
Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2015 Nov-Dec;52(Pt A):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental changes of Reelin-expressing cell populations in the marginal zone of the neocortex of the European wild boar, Sus scrofa.欧洲野猪(Sus scrofa)新皮质边缘区中表达Reelin的细胞群体的发育变化。
Brain Struct Funct. 2025 Jun 11;230(6):96. doi: 10.1007/s00429-025-02958-w.
2
Establishing the pig as a translational animal model for neurodevelopment.将猪确立为神经发育的转化动物模型。
Transl Neurosci. 2025 Apr 24;16(1):20250369. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2025-0369. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
3
Photoperiod Management in Farm Animal Husbandry: A Review.农场畜牧业中的光周期管理:综述
Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 18;15(4):591. doi: 10.3390/ani15040591.
4
Pigs solve a cooperative task without showing a clear understanding of the need for a partner.猪能完成一项合作任务,但对合作伙伴的需求却没有清晰的理解。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 11;15(1):5095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84529-3.
5
Generation and transcriptomic characterization of MIR137 knockout miniature pig model for neurodevelopmental disorders.用于神经发育障碍的MIR137基因敲除小型猪模型的构建及转录组特征分析
Cell Biosci. 2024 Jun 28;14(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s13578-024-01268-8.
6
Hypercapnia Causes Injury of the Cerebral Cortex and Cognitive Deficits in Newborn Piglets.高碳酸血症导致新生仔猪大脑皮质损伤和认知功能障碍。
eNeuro. 2024 Mar 4;11(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0268-23.2023. Print 2024 Mar.
7
The Pig as a Translational Animal Model for Biobehavioral and Neurotrauma Research.猪作为生物行为学和神经创伤研究的转化动物模型。
Biomedicines. 2023 Aug 1;11(8):2165. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082165.
8
An insight into the runs of homozygosity distribution and breed differentiation in Mangalitsa pigs.对曼加利察猪纯合性分布和品种分化的洞察。
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 18;13:909986. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.909986. eCollection 2022.
9
Saliva metabolome alterations after acute stress.急性应激后唾液代谢组的改变。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 2;12(1):18470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23136-6.
10
Risk Factors for Chronic Stress in Sows Housed in Groups, and Associated Risks of Prenatal Stress in Their Offspring.群体饲养母猪慢性应激的风险因素及其后代产前应激的相关风险。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 12;9:883154. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.883154. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The standardization-generalization dilemma: a way out.标准化-概括困境:一条出路。
Genes Brain Behav. 2010 Nov;9(8):849-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2010.00628.x.
2
Focal lesions of human hippocampal CA1 neurons in transient global amnesia impair place memory.短暂性全面遗忘症患者的海马 CA1 神经元局灶性损伤损害位置记忆。
Science. 2010 Jun 11;328(5984):1412-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1188160.
3
A modified mark test for own-body recognition in pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina).猪尾猕猴(Macaca nemestrina)自体识别的改良标记测试。
Anim Cogn. 2010 Jul;13(4):631-9. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0313-1. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
4
A critical review of chronic stress effects on spatial learning and memory.慢性应激对空间学习和记忆影响的批判性评价。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Jun 30;34(5):742-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
5
Learning under stress impairs memory formation.应激下学习会损害记忆形成。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010 Feb;93(2):183-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
6
Working and reference memory of pigs in the spatial holeboard discrimination task.猪在空间洞板辨别任务中的工作记忆和参考记忆。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Dec 14;205(1):303-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
7
Individual housing of mice--impact on behaviour and stress responses.小鼠的个体饲养——对行为和应激反应的影响。
Physiol Behav. 2009 Jun 22;97(3-4):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
8
Evaluation of animal models of neurobehavioral disorders.神经行为障碍动物模型评估。
Behav Brain Funct. 2009 Feb 25;5:11. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-5-11.
9
Removing obstacles in neuroscience drug discovery: the future path for animal models.消除神经科学药物研发中的障碍:动物模型的未来之路。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Jan;34(1):74-89. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.173. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
10
Female mini-pig performance of temporal response differentiation, incremental repeated acquisition, and progressive ratio operant tasks.雌性小型猪在时间反应分化、递增重复习得和渐进比率操作性任务中的表现。
Behav Processes. 2009 Jan;80(1):28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Aug 30.

评估猪的学习和记忆能力。

Assessing learning and memory in pigs.

机构信息

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Emotion and Cognition Program, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):151-73. doi: 10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3. Epub 2011 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10071-010-0364-3
PMID:21203792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3040303/
Abstract

In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in (mini) pigs (Sus scrofa) as species for cognitive research. A major reason for this is their physiological and anatomical similarity with humans. For example, pigs possess a well-developed, large brain. Assessment of the learning and memory functions of pigs is not only relevant to human research but also to animal welfare, given the nature of current farming practices and the demands they make on animal health and behavior. In this article, we review studies of pig cognition, focusing on the underlying processes and mechanisms, with a view to identifying. Our goal is to aid the selection of appropriate cognitive tasks for research into pig cognition. To this end, we formulated several basic criteria for pig cognition tests and then applied these criteria and knowledge about pig-specific sensorimotor abilities and behavior to evaluate the merits, drawbacks, and limitations of the different types of tests used to date. While behavioral studies using (mini) pigs have shown that this species can perform learning and memory tasks, and much has been learned about pig cognition, results have not been replicated or proven replicable because of the lack of validated, translational behavioral paradigms that are specially suited to tap specific aspects of pig cognition. We identified several promising types of tasks for use in studies of pig cognition, such as versatile spatial free-choice type tasks that allow the simultaneous measurement of several behavioral domains. The use of appropriate tasks will facilitate the collection of reliable and valid data on pig cognition.

摘要

近年来,小型猪(Sus scrofa)作为认知研究的物种引起了人们的极大兴趣。主要原因是它们在生理和解剖上与人类相似。例如,猪具有发达的大脑。评估猪的学习和记忆功能不仅与人类研究相关,而且与动物福利相关,因为当前的养殖实践性质以及它们对动物健康和行为的要求。在本文中,我们回顾了猪认知的研究,重点介绍了潜在的过程和机制,以期确定。我们的目标是帮助选择适合研究猪认知的认知任务。为此,我们制定了一些猪认知测试的基本标准,然后应用这些标准和关于猪特定感觉运动能力和行为的知识来评估迄今为止使用的不同类型测试的优点、缺点和局限性。虽然使用(小型)猪的行为研究表明,这种物种可以执行学习和记忆任务,并且已经了解了很多关于猪认知的知识,但由于缺乏专门适用于挖掘猪认知特定方面的经过验证、可转化的行为范式,因此结果尚未得到复制或证明具有可复制性。我们确定了几种有前途的猪认知研究任务类型,例如多功能空间自由选择型任务,可同时测量几个行为领域。使用适当的任务将有助于收集关于猪认知的可靠和有效的数据。