• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医疗注射药物项目中,将办公室管理的专科药物转移至专科药房供应商所带来的预计成本节约。

Estimated cost savings associated with the transfer of office-administered specialty pharmaceuticals to a specialty pharmacy provider in a Medical Injectable Drug program.

作者信息

Baldini Christopher G, Culley Eric J

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy Services, Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield, 120 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1812, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):51-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.1.51.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.1.51
PMID:21204590
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10437622/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A large managed care organization (MCO) in western Pennsylvania initiated a Medical Injectable Drug (MID) program in 2002 that transferred a specific subset of specialty drugs from physician reimbursement under the traditional "buy-and-bill" model in the medical benefit to MCO purchase from a specialty pharmacy provider (SPP) that supplied physician offices with the MIDs. The MID program was initiated with 4 drugs in 2002 (palivizumab and 3 hyaluronate products/derivatives) growing to more than 50 drugs by 2007-2008.

OBJECTIVE

To (a) describe the MID program as a method to manage the cost and delivery of this subset of specialty drugs, and (b) estimate the MID program cost savings in 2007 and 2008 in an MCO with approximately 4.6 million members.

METHODS

Cost savings generated by the MID program were calculated by comparing the total actual expenditure (plan cost plus member cost) on medications included in the MID program for calendar years 2007 and 2008 with the total estimated expenditure that would have been paid to physicians during the same time period for the same medication if reimbursement had been made using HCPCS (J code) billing under the physician "buy-and-bill" reimbursement rates.

RESULTS

For the approximately 50 drugs in the MID program in 2007 and 2008, the drug cost savings in 2007 were estimated to be $15.5 million (18.2%) or $290 per claim ($0.28 per member per month [PMPM]) and about $13 million (12.7%) or $201 per claim ($0.23 PMPM) in 2008. Although 28% of MID claims continued to be billed by physicians using J codes in 2007 and 22% in 2008, all claims for MIDs were limited to the SPP reimbursement rates.

CONCLUSION

This MID program was associated with health plan cost savings of approximately $28.5 million over 2 years, achieved by the transfer of about 50 physician-administered injectable pharmaceuticals from reimbursement to physicians to reimbursement to a single SPP and payment of physician claims for MIDs at the SPP reimbursement rates.

摘要

背景

宾夕法尼亚州西部的一家大型管理式医疗组织(MCO)于2002年启动了一项医用注射药物(MID)计划,该计划将特定的专科药物子集从传统“购买并计费”模式下的医生报销(医保福利范畴)转移至由专科药房供应商(SPP)向MCO供应,再由SPP向医生办公室提供这些MID药物。2002年该MID计划起始时有4种药物(帕利珠单抗和3种透明质酸盐产品/衍生物),到2007 - 2008年增加到50多种药物。

目的

(a)将MID计划描述为管理这一专科药物子集成本和供应的一种方法,(b)估算2007年和2008年在一个拥有约460万会员的MCO中MID计划节省的成本。

方法

通过比较2007年和2008年MID计划所涵盖药物的实际总支出(计划成本加会员成本)与如果按照医生“购买并计费”报销费率使用医疗保健通用程序编码系统(HCPCS,J编码)计费在同一时期向医生支付的相同药物的估计总支出,来计算MID计划产生的成本节省。

结果

对于2007年和2008年MID计划中的约50种药物,2007年药物成本节省估计为1550万美元(18.2%),即每项索赔节省290美元(每月每位会员节省0.28美元[PMPM]),2008年约为1300万美元(12.7%),即每项索赔节省201美元(0.23美元PMPM)。尽管2007年28%的MID索赔仍由医生使用J编码计费,2008年这一比例为

相似文献

1
Estimated cost savings associated with the transfer of office-administered specialty pharmaceuticals to a specialty pharmacy provider in a Medical Injectable Drug program.在医疗注射药物项目中,将办公室管理的专科药物转移至专科药房供应商所带来的预计成本节约。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):51-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.1.51.
2
Effects of a physician office generic drug sampling system on generic dispensing ratios and drug costs in a large managed care organization.医师办公室通用药物抽样系统对大型管理式医疗组织中通用药物配药比例和药品成本的影响。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Jun;13(5):412-9. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.5.412.
3
Provider-administered drugs move to specialty pharmacy benefit.由医疗机构提供的药物转至专科药房福利范畴。
Manag Care. 2014 Apr;23(4):49.
4
Five-year examination of utilization and drug cost outcomes associated with benefit design changes including reference pricing for proton pump inhibitors in a state employee health plan.对一项州雇员健康计划中与福利设计变更(包括质子泵抑制剂参考定价)相关的使用情况和药品成本结果进行的五年审查。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Apr;17(3):200-12. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.3.200.
5
Case study of the effects of office-based generic drug sampling on antibiotic drug costs and first-line antibiotic prescribing ratios.基于办公室的非专利药品抽样对抗生素药物成本及一线抗生素处方比例影响的案例研究
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):55-61. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.1.55.
6
Utilization, cost trends, and member cost-share for self-injectable multiple sclerosis drugs--pharmacy and medical benefit spending from 2004 through 2007.自注射用多发性硬化症药物的使用情况、成本趋势及成员费用分担——2004年至2007年的药房及医疗福利支出
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(9):799-806. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.9.799.
7
Utilization and cost of sildenafil in a large managed care organization with a quantity limit on sildenafil.在对西地那非设有数量限制的大型管理式医疗组织中,西地那非的使用情况及成本
J Manag Care Pharm. 2005 Oct;11(8):674-80. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2005.11.8.674.
8
Managing the intersection of medical and pharmacy benefits.管理医疗福利与药房福利的交叉点。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 May;14(4 Suppl):S7-11. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.S4-A.7.
9
Comparison of mail-order with community pharmacy in plan sponsor cost and member cost in two large pharmacy benefit plans.在两项大型药房福利计划中,邮购药房与社区药房在计划赞助商成本和会员成本方面的比较。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Mar;13(2):122-34. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2007.13.2.122.
10
Relationship of the use and costs of physician office visits and prescription drugs to travel distance and increases in member cost share.医生门诊就诊及处方药的使用和费用与出行距离及会员费用分担增加之间的关系。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2006 Oct;12(8):665-76. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2006.12.8.665.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing the conversation: 30 years of scholarship in managed care pharmacy.推动对话:管理式医疗药学30年学术研究
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Jul;31(7):617-626. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.7.617.
2
Determinants of pharmaceutical expenditures of urban households: A time series study in Kermanshah province (Iran).城市家庭药品支出的决定因素:克尔曼沙阿省(伊朗)的一项时间序列研究。
Electron Physician. 2015 Nov 20;7(7):1470-5. doi: 10.19082/1470. eCollection 2015 Nov.
3
Cost Management through Care Management, Part 2: The Importance of Managing Specialty Drug Utilization in the Medical Benefit.通过护理管理进行成本管理,第2部分:管理医疗福利中专科药物使用的重要性。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2012 Sep;5(6):359-64.
4
Medical oncologists' perceptions of financial incentives in cancer care.肿瘤内科医生对癌症治疗中财务激励的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 10;31(5):530-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.6063. Epub 2012 Dec 26.