• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Economic evaluation of gastric ulcer prophylaxis in patients with arthritis receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.对接受非甾体抗炎药治疗的关节炎患者进行胃溃疡预防的经济学评估。
Postgrad Med J. 1990 Aug;66(778):639-46. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.66.778.639.
2
Economic evaluation of prophylactic treatment with Misoprostol in osteoarthritic patients treated with NSAIDs. The case of Belgium.米索前列醇对比非甾体抗炎药治疗骨关节炎患者预防性治疗的经济学评估。以比利时为例。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990;38(3):187-99.
3
Economic effects of prophylactic use of misoprostol to prevent gastric ulcer in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Sep;149(9):2061-5.
4
[Cost-effectiveness of preventive treatment with misoprostol in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents related gastric ulcers].[米索前列醇预防性治疗非甾体抗炎药相关性胃溃疡的成本效益分析]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1991;15(5):399-404.
5
Misoprostol compared with sucralfate in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric ulcer. A randomized, controlled trial.米索前列醇与硫糖铝预防非甾体抗炎药所致胃溃疡的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1991 Aug 1;115(3):195-200. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-115-3-195.
6
Use of misoprostol in the elderly: is the expense justified?米索前列醇在老年人中的应用:费用是否合理?
Drugs Aging. 1996 Feb;8(2):84-8. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199608020-00002.
7
Prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcer with misoprostol: multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.米索前列醇预防非甾体抗炎药引起的胃溃疡:多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 1988 Dec 3;2(8623):1277-80. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)92892-9.
8
Misoprostol prevents nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced gastric ulcers--Has Pandora's box been opened?米索前列醇预防非甾体抗炎药所致胃溃疡——潘多拉魔盒是否已被打开?
Gastroenterology. 1989 Oct;97(4):1053-5. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(89)91522-9.
9
Cost-effectiveness of misoprostol for prophylaxis against nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastrointestinal tract bleeding.米索前列醇预防非甾体抗炎药所致胃肠道出血的成本效益分析
JAMA. 1990 Jul 4;264(1):41-7.
10
Misoprostol and ulcer prophylaxis.米索前列醇与溃疡预防。
Lancet. 1989 Jan 28;1(8631):212-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91220-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Etoricoxib versus Celecoxib and Nonselective NSAIDs in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in Norway.依托考昔与塞来昔布及非选择性非甾体抗炎药治疗挪威强直性脊柱炎的成本效益评估
Int J Rheumatol. 2011;2011:160326. doi: 10.1155/2011/160326. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
2
Cost effectiveness of etoricoxib versus celecoxib and non-selective NSAIDS in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.依托考昔对比塞来昔布和非选择性 NSAIDs 在治疗强直性脊柱炎中的成本效果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(4):323-44. doi: 10.2165/11314690-000000000-00000.
3
Economic evaluation of etoricoxib versus non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis patients in the UK.依托考昔与非选择性非甾体抗炎药治疗英国骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(10):643-60. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422100-00003.
4
Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis comparing rofecoxib with nonselective NSAIDs in osteoarthritis: Ontario Ministry of Health perspective.从安大略省卫生部角度比较罗非昔布与非选择性非甾体抗炎药治疗骨关节炎的增量成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(10):1039-49. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119100-00005.
5
A framework for evaluating the clinical consequences of initial therapy with NSAIDs, NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agents, or celecoxib in the treatment of arthritis.一种用于评估非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)、NSAIDs加胃保护剂或塞来昔布初始治疗关节炎的临床后果的框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 1:33-47. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119001-00003.
6
Healthcare resource utilisation and costs of treating NSAID-associated gastrointestinal toxicity. A multinational perspective.非甾体抗炎药相关胃肠道毒性的医疗资源利用及治疗成本:多国视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 1:17-32. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119001-00002.
7
The burden of arthritis and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory treatment. A European literature review.关节炎负担与非甾体抗炎治疗:一项欧洲文献综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 1:1-15. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119001-00001.
8
Systematic review of the cost effectiveness of prophylactic treatments in the prevention of gastropathy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.对类风湿关节炎或骨关节炎患者服用非甾体抗炎药时预防性治疗预防胃病成本效益的系统评价。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Oct;59(10):753-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.59.10.753.
9
The cost effectiveness of misoprostol prophylaxis alongside long-term nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Implications of the MUCOSA trial.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Mar;17(3):295-304. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017030-00007.
10
Cost-effectiveness of strategies for primary prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced peptic ulcer disease.非甾体抗炎药所致消化性溃疡病一级预防策略的成本效益
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jun;15(6):400-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.03459.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of anti-inflammatory drug administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. An endoscopic assessment.抗炎药物给药对类风湿性关节炎患者的影响。内镜评估。
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1981;67:131-5.
2
Epidemiology of peptic ulcer disease.消化性溃疡疾病的流行病学
Clin Gastroenterol. 1984 May;13(2):289-307.
3
From experiment to experience: side effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.从实验到临床:非甾体抗炎药的副作用
Am J Med. 1983 May;74(5):820-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91073-2.
4
Application of decision analysis to management of cerebral arteriovenous malformation.决策分析在脑动静脉畸形管理中的应用。
Lancet. 1983 May 21;1(8334):1132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92868-4.
5
20 years of hospital admissions for peptic ulcer in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士因消化性溃疡住院20年的情况。
Lancet. 1981 Jun 13;1(8233):1302-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92470-3.
6
A double-blind multicentre trial of piroxicam and naproxen in osteoarthritis.吡罗昔康与萘普生治疗骨关节炎的双盲多中心试验。
Clin Rheumatol. 1986 Jan;5(1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02030974.
7
Upper gastrointestinal findings and faecal occult blood in patients with rheumatic diseases taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.服用非甾体抗炎药的风湿性疾病患者的上消化道检查结果及粪便潜血情况。
Br J Rheumatol. 1987 Aug;26(4):295-8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/26.4.295.
8
The association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.非甾体抗炎药与上消化道出血的关联。
Arch Intern Med. 1987 Jan;147(1):85-8.
9
Prevention of gastroduodenal damage induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: controlled trial of ranitidine.预防非甾体抗炎药所致胃十二指肠损伤:雷尼替丁对照试验
BMJ. 1988 Oct 22;297(6655):1017-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6655.1017.
10
Double-blind comparison of two dosage regimens of misoprostol in the treatment of duodenal ulceration.
Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Oct;33(10):1269-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01536678.

对接受非甾体抗炎药治疗的关节炎患者进行胃溃疡预防的经济学评估。

Economic evaluation of gastric ulcer prophylaxis in patients with arthritis receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

作者信息

Knill-Jones R, Drummond M, Kohli H, Davies L

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Postgrad Med J. 1990 Aug;66(778):639-46. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.66.778.639.

DOI:10.1136/pgmj.66.778.639
PMID:2120690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2429666/
Abstract

This study assesses the economic benefits of misoprostol in the prophylaxis of gastric ulcers larger than 0.3 cm in patients with osteoarthritis receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Independent epidemiological data were obtained for patients in Scotland and the West Midlands. Co-diagnosis of arthritis with gastric ulcer recorded in the routine data was substantially less (4% Scotland, 10% West Midlands) than the 21% found at case review. These data were combined with cost and patient management data in a decision analysis model to explore whether prophylactic use of misoprostol altered substantially the average cost of managing gastric ulcer. Using conservative assumptions and a daily dose of 400 micrograms, cost savings per patient to the National Health Service of 5-8 pounds over a 3-month period are expected in the groups of patients studied, while at the 800 micrograms dose there would be a net cost of 23-25 pounds. Sensitivity analysis showed that under many assumptions misoprostol is expected to be cost saving or cost neutral.

摘要

本研究评估了米索前列醇在预防骨关节炎患者使用非甾体抗炎药时发生的大于0.3厘米胃溃疡方面的经济效益。获取了苏格兰和西米德兰兹郡患者的独立流行病学数据。常规数据中记录的关节炎合并胃溃疡的共诊断率(苏格兰为4%,西米德兰兹郡为10%)远低于病例复查时发现的21%。这些数据与成本和患者管理数据相结合,纳入一个决策分析模型,以探讨预防性使用米索前列醇是否会大幅改变胃溃疡管理的平均成本。采用保守假设并每日剂量为400微克时,在所研究的患者组中,预计在3个月期间每位患者可为英国国家医疗服务体系节省5至8英镑的成本,而每日剂量为800微克时,净成本将为23至25英镑。敏感性分析表明,在许多假设条件下,预计米索前列醇可节省成本或成本持平。