• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于价值的保险加上疾病管理增加了药物的使用并产生了节约。

Value-based insurance plus disease management increased medication use and produced savings.

机构信息

Thomson Reuters, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):100-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0896.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0896
PMID:21209445
Abstract

We evaluated the effects of implementing a value-based insurance design program for patients with diabetes in two groups within a single firm. One group participated in disease management; the other did not. We matched members of the two groups to similar enrollees within the company that did not offer the value-based program. We found that participation in both value-based insurance design and disease management resulted in sustained improvement over time. Use of diabetes medications increased 6.5 percent over three years. Adherence to diabetes medical guidelines also increased, producing a return on investment of $1.33 saved for every dollar spent during a three-year follow-up period.

摘要

我们评估了在一家公司的两个小组中实施基于价值的保险设计计划对糖尿病患者的影响。一组参与疾病管理;另一组则不参与。我们将两组的成员与公司内不提供基于价值的计划的类似参保人相匹配。我们发现,参与基于价值的保险设计和疾病管理都能随着时间的推移持续改善。三年内,糖尿病药物的使用增加了 6.5%。对糖尿病医疗指南的遵循性也有所提高,在为期三年的随访期间,每花费 1 美元就能节省 1.33 美元的投资回报。

相似文献

1
Value-based insurance plus disease management increased medication use and produced savings.基于价值的保险加上疾病管理增加了药物的使用并产生了节约。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):100-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0896.
2
Diabetes disease management in a community-based setting.社区环境下的糖尿病疾病管理。
Manag Care. 2002 Jun;11(6):42, 45-50.
3
Value-based insurance design yields near- and long-term improvements in medication adherence.基于价值的保险设计在药物依从性方面产生了近期和长期的改善。
Find Brief. 2013 Mar;16(1):1-3.
4
Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care.三种医疗体系中糖尿病患者的健康保险状况、与费用相关的药物治疗未充分使用情况及治疗结果
Med Care. 2004 Feb;42(2):102-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000108742.26446.17.
5
The impact of a value-based insurance design plus health coaching on medication adherence and medical spending.基于价值的保险设计加健康指导对药物依从性和医疗支出的影响。
Popul Health Manag. 2015 Jun;18(3):151-8. doi: 10.1089/pop.2014.0081. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
A value-based insurance design program at a large company boosted medication adherence for employees with chronic illnesses.一家大公司的基于价值的保险设计方案提高了慢性病员工的药物依从性。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):109-17. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0510.
7
Value-based insurance design for diabetes mellitus: approaches to optimal pharmacoeconomic implementation.糖尿病的基于价值的保险设计:优化药物经济学实施的方法。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec;16(11 Suppl):S314-22.
8
Medication cost savings associated with weight loss for obese non-insulin-dependent diabetic men and women.肥胖的非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病男性和女性通过减肥节省的药物费用。
Prev Med. 1995 Jul;24(4):369-74. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1060.
9
[Disease Management Program - diabetes. Useful only to insurance].[疾病管理项目 - 糖尿病。仅对保险有用]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2005 Nov 10;147(45):11.
10
Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?风险均等化是否会降低自愿免赔额的可行性?
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2007 Mar;7(1):43-58. doi: 10.1007/s10754-007-9011-1. Epub 2007 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Financial Incentives as a Tool to Increase Medication Adherence for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估经济激励措施作为提高2型糖尿病患者药物依从性的工具:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Ther. 2025 Mar;16(3):527-545. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01694-y. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
2
Does the diabetes health plan have a differential impact on medication adherence among beneficiaries with fewer financial resources?糖尿病健康计划是否对经济资源较少的受益人群的药物依从性产生差异影响?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):948-957. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.948.
3
Ensuring trustworthy use of artificial intelligence and big data analytics in health insurance.
确保在健康保险中可信地使用人工智能和大数据分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):263-269. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.234732. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
4
Should national pharmacare apply a value-based insurance design?国家药物保险计划是否应采用基于价值的保险设计?
CMAJ. 2019 Jul 22;191(29):E811-E815. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181721.
5
How to make value-based health insurance designs more effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.如何使基于价值的健康保险设计更有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Aug;20(6):841-856. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01046-1. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
A Systematic Review of Insulin Adherence Measures in Patients with Diabetes.糖尿病患者胰岛素依从性测量的系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1224-1246. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1224.
7
Impact of a Value-based Formulary on Medication Utilization, Health Services Utilization, and Expenditures.基于价值的处方集对药物使用、医疗服务利用及支出的影响。
Med Care. 2017 Feb;55(2):191-198. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000630.
8
Impact of a Novel Cost-Saving Pharmacy Program on Pregabalin Use and Health Care Costs.新型节省成本的药房方案对普瑞巴林使用和医疗保健费用的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Feb;22(2):132-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.15180. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
9
A randomized controlled trial of negative co-payments: the CHORD trial.负自付费用的随机对照试验:CHORD试验。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Aug;21(8):e465-73.
10
A randomized controlled trial of co-payment elimination: the CHORD trial.共付额消除的随机对照试验:CHORD试验。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Aug;21(8):e455-64.