BIOGEMMA, Genetics and Genomics in Cereals, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 2, France.
Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Apr;122(6):1149-60. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1519-y. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
Association mapping of sequence polymorphisms underlying the phenotypic variability of quantitative agronomical traits is now a widely used method in plant genetics. However, due to the common presence of a complex genetic structure within the plant diversity panels, spurious associations are expected to be highly frequent. Several methods have thus been suggested to control for panel structure. They mainly rely on ad hoc criteria for selecting the number of ancestral groups; which is often not evident for the complex panels that are commonly used in maize. It was thus necessary to evaluate the effect of the selected structure models on the association mapping results. A real maize data set (342 maize inbred lines and 12,000 SNPs) was used for this study. The panel structure was estimated using both Bayesian and dimensional reduction methods, considering an increasing number of ancestral groups. Effect on association tests depends in particular on the number of ancestral groups and on the trait analyzed. The results also show that using a high number of ancestral groups leads to an over-corrected model in which all causal loci vanish. Finally the results of all models tested were combined in a meta-analysis approach. In this way, robust associations were highlighted for each analyzed trait.
关联作图是一种广泛应用于植物遗传学的方法,用于研究表型变异的数量性状的序列多态性与遗传基础之间的关系。然而,由于植物多样性群体中普遍存在复杂的遗传结构,假关联预计会非常频繁。因此,已经提出了几种方法来控制群体结构。这些方法主要依赖于特定的标准来选择祖先群体的数量,而对于常用的复杂玉米群体来说,这通常是不明显的。因此,有必要评估所选结构模型对关联作图结果的影响。本研究使用了一个真实的玉米数据集(342 个玉米自交系和 12000 个 SNPs)。使用贝叶斯和降维方法来估计群体结构,考虑了越来越多的祖先群体。关联测试的影响尤其取决于祖先群体的数量和分析的性状。结果还表明,使用大量的祖先群体会导致过度校正模型,其中所有的因果基因座都消失了。最后,对所有测试模型的结果进行了元分析。通过这种方式,对每个分析的性状都强调了稳健的关联。