• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种种植体/基台螺纹连接的循环载荷抗性及预载荷分布的体外分析

In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.

作者信息

Murmura Giovanna, Di Iorio Donato, Cicchetti Angelo Raffaele, Sinjari Bruna, Caputi Sergio

机构信息

Department of Stomatology and Oral Sciences and Ce.S.I, University G. d 'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Italy.

出版信息

J Oral Implantol. 2013 Jun;39(3):293-301. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00144. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00144
PMID:21231867
Abstract

The aim of the present research is an in vitro evaluation of the preload distribution in screw-retained implant systems under cyclic load. Two implant systems with internal connection were tested: fifteen 4.5 × 10 mm implants with internal hexagon and fifteen 4.5 × 10 mm implants with internal octagon. Samples underwent cyclic load that was between 20 N and 200 N for 1 × 10(6) cycles. After mechanical tests, samples were sectioned along the long axis and analyzed under a scanning electron microscope. Five 4.5 × 10 mm implants with internal hexagon and five 4.5 × 10 mm implants with internal octagon were collected for photoelastic analysis. Each fixture was mounted in a wax-made parallelepiped measuring 20 mm × 20 mm × 10 mm. A mold was made for each wax parallelepiped/fixture assembly using a silicone-based impression material, and an epoxy resin was poured in each mold. After setting of the resin, 25° angled titanium abutments were screwed onto each replica; afterwards, assemblies underwent photoelastic analysis. After cyclic load, screw threads and heads were still in contact with internal fixture threads and abutment holes, respectively, suggesting that preload has not been lost during load. During load, SSO and Xsigñ implants behave in a different way. SSO samples revealed the presence of fringes radiating from the base of the abutment. Xsigñ implants showed the presence of fringes radiating from the threads of the retention screw. From the present in vitro research, it is possible to state that screw-retained abutment based on an internal octagonal connection is less likely to come loose after cyclic load.

摘要

本研究的目的是对螺旋固位种植系统在循环载荷下的预紧力分布进行体外评估。测试了两种具有内部连接的种植系统:十五颗4.5×10 mm的内六角种植体和十五颗4.5×10 mm的内八角种植体。样本承受20 N至200 N的循环载荷,循环次数为1×10(6)次。力学测试后,将样本沿长轴切开,并在扫描电子显微镜下进行分析。收集五颗4.5×10 mm的内六角种植体和五颗4.5×10 mm的内八角种植体进行光弹性分析。每个种植体基台安装在一个20 mm×20 mm×10 mm的蜡制平行六面体中。使用硅基印模材料为每个蜡制平行六面体/种植体基台组件制作模具,并在每个模具中倒入环氧树脂。树脂凝固后,将25°角的钛基台拧到每个复制体上;之后,对组件进行光弹性分析。循环加载后,螺纹和头部仍分别与内部种植体基台螺纹和基台孔接触,这表明在加载过程中预紧力没有损失。在加载过程中,SSO和Xsigñ种植体的表现有所不同。SSO样本显示从基台底部辐射出条纹。Xsigñ种植体显示从固位螺钉的螺纹处辐射出条纹。从目前的体外研究可以得出结论,基于内部八角形连接的螺旋固位基台在循环加载后松动的可能性较小。

相似文献

1
In vitro analysis of resistance to cyclic load and preload distribution of two implant/abutment screwed connections.两种种植体/基台螺纹连接的循环载荷抗性及预载荷分布的体外分析
J Oral Implantol. 2013 Jun;39(3):293-301. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00144. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
2
In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.体外静态负荷下三种氧化锆种植体基台的评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):255-63. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60054-2.
3
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
4
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.
5
Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.钛-钛及钛-氧化锆种植体-基台界面的磨损:一项体外比较研究。
Dent Mater. 2012 Dec;28(12):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
6
Wear at the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a pilot study.钛-氧化锆种植体-基台界面的磨损:一项初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):970-5.
7
Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.四种不同螺钉材料和表面的种植体基台螺钉旋转及预紧力
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1):24-32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116230.
8
Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.种植体支持的螺丝固位三单位固定桥修复中基台位置的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Jul;20(5):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00714.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
9
Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.7种六角形顶端基台系统的种植体-基台螺丝连接预紧力
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 May-Jun;16(3):367-77.
10
The influence of stiffness of implant-abutment connection on load-deflection ratios of a screw-retained stiff cantilever beam. 3-D measurements in vitro.种植体-基台连接刚度对螺丝固位刚性悬臂梁载荷-挠度比的影响。体外三维测量。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1251-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02563.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Biconometric Connections in Dental Implants: A Pilot Mechanical Study.牙种植体中的双锥测量连接:一项初步力学研究。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Mar 23;18(7):1415. doi: 10.3390/ma18071415.
2
Mechanical Pull-Out Test of a New Hybrid Fixture-Abutment Connection: An In Vitro Study.新型混合式种植体-基台连接的机械拔出试验:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 22;14(6):1555. doi: 10.3390/ma14061555.
3
Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.不同种植体-基台连接的机械行为研究综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(22):8685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228685.
4
Systematic analysis of factors that cause loss of preload in dental implants.牙种植体中导致预负荷丧失的因素的系统分析。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 Jul-Sep;18(3):189-195. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_294_17.
5
Preload loss of abutment screws after dynamic fatigue in single implant-supported restorations. A systematic review.单颗种植体支持修复体动态疲劳后基台螺钉的预紧力丧失:一项系统评价
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Nov 1;9(11):e1355-e1361. doi: 10.4317/jced.54374. eCollection 2017 Nov.