• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估癌症的互联网流行情况。

Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The Great Western Hospital, Swindon, UK.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;65(2):178-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02617.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02617.x
PMID:21235698
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The internet is one of the most frequently accessed sources of information by patients. There is a variety of cancer-related information provided by the internet, aimed at both the general public (from official sites and non-regulated sites) and health care professionals. Little is known about whether the information provided reflects the prevalence of disease.

METHODS

Searches for the 10 most common UK cancers were performed using five internet search engines. The number of relevant webpages was recorded and compared to the prevalence of each cancer according to Cancer Research UK.

RESULTS

Of the 985,687,623 webpages identified, the majority were related to breast cancer (37.2%), followed by lung (16.2%) and prostate cancer (12.5%). Colorectal cancer, Oesophageal cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma had the least number of websites (4.1%, 0.3% and 0.9%, respectively). There was over-representation of breast, kidney and stomach cancer with ratios of prevalence to number of websites of 1.7, 2.6 and 2.5 to 1, respectively. There was under-representation of colorectal cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and oesophageal cancer (ratios 0.2, 0.2 and 0.1, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This data highlights the enormity of information available on the internet. However, there is over-representation of certain cancers (and under-representation of others) which may influence how patients perceive their illness. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the nature of information available on the internet and known when and how to direct patients to reputable sites that provide high quality information.

摘要

简介

互联网是患者最常访问的信息来源之一。互联网上提供了各种癌症相关信息,既有针对普通大众(来自官方和非监管网站)的,也有针对医疗保健专业人员的。目前尚不清楚提供的信息是否反映了疾病的流行程度。

方法

使用五个互联网搜索引擎搜索英国最常见的 10 种癌症。记录相关网页数量,并根据英国癌症研究中心(Cancer Research UK)的数据比较每种癌症的患病率。

结果

在所确定的 985,687,623 个网页中,大多数与乳腺癌(37.2%)相关,其次是肺癌(16.2%)和前列腺癌(12.5%)。结直肠癌、食管癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤的网站数量最少(分别为 4.1%、0.3%和 0.9%)。乳腺癌、肾癌和胃癌的比例过高,患病率与网站数量的比值分别为 1.7、2.6 和 2.5。结直肠癌、非霍奇金淋巴瘤和食管癌的比例过低(比值分别为 0.2、0.2 和 0.1)。

结论

该数据突出了互联网上可获得的信息量巨大。然而,某些癌症的代表性过高(而其他癌症的代表性过低),这可能会影响患者对自身疾病的认知。医疗保健专业人员应该了解互联网上可用信息的性质,并知道何时以及如何引导患者访问提供高质量信息的可靠网站。

相似文献

1
Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer.评估癌症的互联网流行情况。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;65(2):178-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02617.x.
2
Searching for suicide-related information on Chinese websites.在中文网站上搜索与自杀相关的信息。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:506-510. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.087. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
3
Quality of nutrition related information on the internet for osteoporosis patients: a critical review.互联网上骨质疏松症患者营养相关信息的质量:一项批判性综述。
Technol Health Care. 2011;19(6):391-400. doi: 10.3233/THC-2011-0643.
4
Breast cancer information on the internet: analysis of accessibility and accuracy.互联网上的乳腺癌信息:可及性和准确性分析。
Breast. 2012 Aug;21(4):514-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.020. Epub 2012 Feb 18.
5
How reliable are "reputable sources" for medical information on the Internet? The case of hormonal therapy to treat prostate cancer.互联网上的医学信息“可靠来源”有多可靠?以激素疗法治疗前列腺癌为例。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1546-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
6
Quality and accuracy of publicly accessible cancer-related physical activity information on the Internet: a cross-sectional assessment.互联网上可公开获取的癌症相关身体活动信息的质量与准确性:一项横断面评估。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Sep;25(5):795-805. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12518. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
7
Accessibility and Quality of Online Cancer-Related Clinical Trial Information for Naïve Searchers.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Oct;24(10):1629-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0274. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine.通过互联网搜索引擎获取的患者脊柱教育的可变性。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Mar;118:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
9
Searching the Internet for information on prostate cancer screening: an assessment of quality.在互联网上搜索前列腺癌筛查信息:质量评估
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):112-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.027.
10
Hydrocele on the web: an evaluation of Internet-based information.网络上关于鞘膜积液的信息:基于互联网信息的评估
Scand J Urol. 2013 Apr;47(2):152-7. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.719540. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌在线信息质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02198-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)相关网络资源质量评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1598-1605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01996-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.