• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。

Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

作者信息

De Groot Lauren, Harris Ilene, Regehr Glenn, Tekian Ara, Ingledew Paris-Ann

机构信息

Undergraduate Medical Program, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Department of Medical Education, College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8
PMID:29047015
Abstract

The Internet is increasingly a source of information for pancreatic cancer patients. This disease is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage; therefore, timely access to high-quality information is critical. Our purpose is to systematically evaluate the information available to pancreatic cancer patients on the internet. An internet search using the term "pancreatic cancer" was performed, with the meta-search engines "Dogpile", "Yippy" and "Google". The top 100 websites returned by the search engines were evaluated using a validated structured rating tool. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics and results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Amongst the 100 websites evaluated, etiology/risk factors and symptoms were the most accurately covered (70 and 67% of websites). Prevention, treatment and prognosis were the least accurate sections (55, 55 and 43% of websites). Prevention and prognosis were also the least likely to be covered with 63 and 51 websites covering these, respectively. Only 40% of websites identified an author. Twenty-two percent of websites were at a university reading level. The majority of online information is accurate but incomplete. Websites may lack information on prognosis. Many websites are outdated and lacked author information, and readability levels are inappropriate. This knowledge can inform the dialogue between healthcare providers and patients.

摘要

互联网日益成为胰腺癌患者获取信息的来源。这种疾病通常在晚期才被诊断出来;因此,及时获取高质量信息至关重要。我们的目的是系统地评估互联网上可供胰腺癌患者获取的信息。使用元搜索引擎“Dogpile”、“Yippy”和“谷歌”,以“胰腺癌”为关键词进行了互联网搜索。使用经过验证的结构化评级工具对搜索引擎返回的前100个网站进行了评估。使用kappa统计量评估评分者间的信度,并使用描述性统计分析结果。在评估的100个网站中,病因/风险因素和症状的涵盖最为准确(分别占网站的70%和67%)。预防、治疗和预后部分的准确性最低(分别占网站的55%、55%和43%)。预防和预后部分也是被涵盖可能性最小的,分别只有63个和51个网站涉及这些内容。只有40%的网站标明了作者。22%的网站处于大学阅读水平。大多数在线信息准确但不完整。网站可能缺乏关于预后的信息。许多网站过时且缺乏作者信息,可读性水平也不合适。这些信息可为医疗服务提供者与患者之间的对话提供参考。

相似文献

1
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者在线资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2019 Apr;34(2):223-228. doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8.
2
Quality of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Resources Available on the Internet.胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)相关网络资源质量评估。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1598-1605. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-01996-2. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Digesting the Contents: an Analysis of Online Colorectal Cancer Education Websites.消化内容:在线结直肠癌教育网站分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Apr;37(2):263-273. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01864-5. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Quality of Online Information Regarding Cervical Cancer.关于宫颈癌的在线信息质量
Cureus. 2020 Aug 1;12(8):e9511. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9511.
5
Depression in cancer: quality assessment of online patient education resources.癌症相关抑郁:在线患者教育资源质量评估。
Psychooncology. 2021 Mar;30(3):400-407. doi: 10.1002/pon.5591. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.乳腺癌资源的过去与现在:八年后对在线资源质量的重新评估
Cureus. 2022 Aug 17;14(8):e28120. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28120. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Hand It to Dr Google: The Quality of Online Information on Ganglion Cysts.向谷歌博士致敬:神经节囊肿在线信息质量。
Hand (N Y). 2022 Jan;17(1):141-147. doi: 10.1177/1558944719895780. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌在线信息质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02198-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
An Evaluation of the Quality of COVID-19 Internet Resources for Cancer Patients.评估面向癌症患者的 COVID-19 互联网资源的质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):763-771. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02182-8. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
10
A fountain of knowledge? The quality of online resources for testicular cancer patients.知识源泉?睾丸癌患者在线资源的质量。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Aug;14(8):E363-E368. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6154.

引用本文的文献

1
Appropriate trust in online health information is associated with information platform, commercial status, and misinformation in patients with high cardiovascular risk.对在线健康信息的适度信任与心血管高危患者的信息平台、商业状况及错误信息相关。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 29;11:20552076251334438. doi: 10.1177/20552076251334438. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
ChatGPT as a Source of Information on Pancreatic Cancer.ChatGPT作为胰腺癌信息来源
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jul 26;121(15):505-506. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0081.
3
Online information-seeking behavior of Iranian web users on Google about Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP): an infodemiology study.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
2
Peering into the Deep: Characterizing the Internet Search Patterns of Patients with Gynecologic Cancers.深入探究:妇科癌症患者的互联网搜索模式特征
J Cancer Educ. 2017 Mar;32(1):85-90. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1002-9.
3
Sifting Through It All: Characterizing Melanoma Patients' Utilization of the Internet as an Information Source.
伊朗网民在谷歌上搜索过敏性紫癜(HSP)的在线信息搜索行为:一项信息流行病学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):1389. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10357-2.
4
Quality of ChatGPT Responses to Questions Related to Pancreatic Cancer and its Surgical Care.ChatGPT对与胰腺癌及其外科治疗相关问题的回答质量。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6284-6286. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13777-w. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
5
Assessing the Educational Value of Pancreatic Cancer Videos on YouTube®.评估YouTube®上胰腺癌视频的教育价值。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1134-1139. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02239-8. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Evaluating the Quality of Online Information Regarding Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.评估关于胰腺癌新辅助治疗的在线信息质量。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023 Sep;54(3):890-896. doi: 10.1007/s12029-022-00879-z. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
Credibility, Accuracy, and Comprehensiveness of Readily Available Internet-Based Information on Treatment and Management of Peripheral Artery Disease and Intermittent Claudication: Review.基于互联网的外周动脉疾病和间歇性跛行治疗与管理的相关信息的可信度、准确性和全面性:综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):e39555. doi: 10.2196/39555.
8
The Past and Present of Breast Cancer Resources: A Re-evaluation of the Quality of Online Resources After Eight Years.乳腺癌资源的过去与现在:八年后对在线资源质量的重新评估
Cureus. 2022 Aug 17;14(8):e28120. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28120. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Quality of Online Information for Esophageal Cancer.食管癌在线信息质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Jun;38(3):863-869. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02198-0. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Online information analysis on pancreatic cancer in Korea using structural topic model.利用结构主题模型对韩国胰腺癌的在线信息进行分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14506-1.
全面梳理:剖析黑色素瘤患者将互联网作为信息来源的使用情况
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Sep;30(3):580-4. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0711-1.
4
Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients.深陷乳腺癌网络:乳腺癌患者对基于网络的信息资源使用情况评估
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Dec;28(4):662-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0509-6.
5
Relative quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information.互联网来源的胃肠道癌症信息的相对质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Dec;27(4):676-9. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0408-2.
6
Quality of Internet-based information on gastrointestinal diseases.基于互联网的胃肠道疾病信息质量。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(2):93-6. doi: 10.1155/2011/345076.
7
Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer.评估癌症的互联网流行情况。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Feb;65(2):178-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02617.x.
8
Gastric cancer-related information on the Internet: incomplete, poorly accessible, and overly commercial.互联网上有关胃癌的信息:不完整、难以获取且过于商业化。
Am J Surg. 2011 Feb;201(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Sep 20.
9
Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.基于互联网的消费者健康信息的可读性评估。
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1310-5.
10
Internet information on colorectal cancer: commercialization and lack of quality control.关于结直肠癌的互联网信息:商业化与缺乏质量控制。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 May;10(4):352-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01316.x. Epub 2007 Jul 20.