Aix-Marseille Université, Institut Méditerranéen d'Ecologie et de Paléoécologie, UMR CNRS IRD, Ecologie Microbienne et Biotechnologies, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques de Saint-Jérôme, Case 452, 13397 Marseille Cedex 20, France.
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Mar;102(6):4495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.053. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
The humification of organic matter during composting was studied by the quantification and monitoring of the evolution of humic substances (Humic Acid-HA and Fulvic Acid-FA) by UV spectra deconvolution (UVSD) and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) methods. The final aim of this work was to compare UVSD to NIRS method, already applied on the same compost samples in previous studies. Finally, UVSD predictions were good for HA and HA/FA (r(2) of 0.828 and 0.531) but very bad for FA (r(2) of 0.092). In contrary, all NIRS correlations were accurate and significant with r(2) of 0.817, 0.806 and 0.864 for HA, FA and HA/FA ratio respectively. From these results, HA/FA ratio being a well-used index of compost maturity, UVSD and NIRS represent two invaluable tools for the monitoring of the composting process. However, we can note that NIRS predictions were more accurate than UVSD calibrations.
采用紫外光谱解卷积(UVSD)和近红外反射光谱(NIRS)方法对腐殖物质(腐殖酸-HA 和富里酸-FA)的演化进行定量和监测,研究了堆肥过程中有机物的腐殖化。本工作的最终目的是比较 UVSD 与 NIRS 方法,这两种方法已在前述研究中应用于相同的堆肥样品。最终,UVSD 对 HA 和 HA/FA 的预测效果良好(r(2)分别为 0.828 和 0.531),但对 FA 的预测效果非常差(r(2)为 0.092)。相反,所有 NIRS 相关性均准确且显著,HA、FA 和 HA/FA 比的 r(2)分别为 0.817、0.806 和 0.864。根据这些结果,HA/FA 比是堆肥成熟度的常用指标,UVSD 和 NIRS 代表监测堆肥过程的两种非常有价值的工具。然而,我们可以注意到,NIRS 预测比 UVSD 校准更准确。