Suppr超能文献

公众对参与研究的态度和看法。

Attitudes and views of the general public towards research participation.

机构信息

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2013 May;43(5):531-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02433.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the challenges of recruitment into clinical trials are well described, little is known about the public's perceptions towards research.

AIMS

We sought to describe the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge of the public towards research and research participation, focusing on clinical trials, contrast these attributes among individuals with different relationships with the healthcare system and to identify predictors of willingness to participate.

METHODS

We conducted a self-administered cross-sectional survey of patients and their significant others in two clinics and two intensive care unit waiting rooms and in three public venues.

RESULTS

We analysed responses from 417 respondents (102 and 105 in dialysis and oncology clinics, and 106 in intensive care unit (ICU) waiting rooms, 104 in public locations). While most (68.3%) respondents favoured the use of humans in clinical trials, 53% felt that trial participants always or almost always receive the best quality of care, only 30.4% had participated in clinical research. Approximately 70% felt that subjects are always advised of the risks and benefits of participation, and 30% expressed ambiguity regarding whether participants are informed of their involvement. Oncology and dialysis respondents were the most and least informed regarding research methods and ethics. The perceived risks and benefits associated with clinical circumstances influence research participation decisions and vary with healthcare experiences. We identified six predictors of willingness to participate.

CONCLUSION

Attitudes of the public towards research participation are beleaguered by misconceptions. Stakeholders in clinical research must educate the general public regarding research methods and ethics.

摘要

背景

虽然招募临床试验参与者面临诸多挑战已得到充分描述,但公众对研究的看法却鲜为人知。

目的

我们旨在描述公众对研究和参与研究的态度、信念和知识,重点关注临床试验,并对比不同医疗体系关系人群的这些特征,同时确定参与研究的意愿预测因素。

方法

我们在两个诊所和两个重症监护病房(ICU)候诊室以及三个公共场所对患者及其重要他人进行了横断面自我管理式调查。

结果

我们分析了来自 417 名受访者(透析诊所和肿瘤科各 102 名和 105 名,ICU 候诊室 106 名,公共场所 104 名)的回复。虽然大多数(68.3%)受访者赞成在临床试验中使用人类,但有 53%的人认为试验参与者总是或几乎总是接受最佳质量的护理,只有 30.4%的人参与过临床研究。大约 70%的人认为受试者总是被告知参与的风险和收益,而 30%的人对参与者是否被告知其参与情况表示含糊不清。肿瘤科和透析科的受访者对研究方法和伦理学的了解程度最高和最低。与临床情况相关的感知风险和收益会影响参与研究的决策,并因医疗保健经历而异。我们确定了六个愿意参与的预测因素。

结论

公众对参与研究的态度受到误解的困扰。临床研究的利益相关者必须向公众宣传研究方法和伦理学。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验