• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与一项女性乳腺癌风险咨询试验。谁参与了?谁拒绝了?高危乳腺癌联盟。

Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial. Who participates? Who declines? High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium.

作者信息

Rimer B K, Schildkraut J M, Lerman C, Lin T H, Audrain J

机构信息

Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1996 Jun 1;77(11):2348-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2348::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-W.

DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2348::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-W
PMID:8635106
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about what factors influence women to participate its trials designed for women at high risk for breast cancer. Yet the recruitment phase is of utmost importance in determining whether the trial can achieve its goals. The purpose of this study was to examine predictors of participation in a risk counseling trial for first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Subjects were identified by their relatives who had received a diagnosis of breast cancer at one of six institutions. Letters of introduction were sent to potentially eligible, unaffected relatives. They were informed about the risk counseling study and given the opportunity to decline. Letters were sent to 1392 first-degree relatives; of these, 1149 women were contacted for an interview and 14% refused. Of the 987 respondents, 47% accepted and 53% declined to participate. Bivariate and multivariate statistics were used to examine predictors of participation.

RESULTS

In the total sample, there were five significant multivariable predictors of participation: level of education, recent clinical breast examination (CBE), objective and perceived breast cancer risk, and any current use of alcohol. Participation was moderated by time since the relative's diagnosis. There was a statistically significant relationship to education such that women with a higher level of education were significantly more likely to participate if they were approached within 2 months of their relative's diagnosis of breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Like many other kinds of trials, participants in this risk counseling trial were significantly more likely to have more than a high school education and more likely to be nonsmokers than the nonparticipants. They also were significantly more likely to drink alcohol (dichotomous measure), have had a recent CBE, and have higher subjective and objective breast cancer risks. Different types of recruitment strategies may be needed depending on the characteristics of the people being recruited and the timing of the invitation.

摘要

背景

对于哪些因素会影响女性参与针对乳腺癌高危女性设计的试验,我们知之甚少。然而,招募阶段对于确定试验能否实现其目标至关重要。本研究的目的是探讨乳腺癌患者一级亲属参与风险咨询试验的预测因素。

方法

通过在六个机构之一被诊断患有乳腺癌的亲属来确定研究对象。向可能符合条件的未受影响的亲属发送介绍信。告知他们有关风险咨询研究的情况,并给予他们拒绝的机会。共向1392名一级亲属发送了信件;其中,1149名女性被联系进行访谈,14%拒绝。在987名受访者中,47%接受并53%拒绝参与。采用双变量和多变量统计方法来检验参与的预测因素。

结果

在总样本中,有五个参与的显著多变量预测因素:教育水平、近期临床乳腺检查(CBE)、客观和感知到的乳腺癌风险以及当前是否饮酒。自亲属诊断以来的时间对参与有调节作用。教育水平与参与之间存在统计学上的显著关系,即如果在亲属被诊断患有乳腺癌后的2个月内与教育水平较高的女性接触,她们参与的可能性显著更高。

结论

与许多其他类型的试验一样,参与这项风险咨询试验的参与者比未参与者更有可能拥有高中以上学历且更有可能不吸烟。他们也更有可能饮酒(二分法测量)、近期接受过CBE检查,并且具有更高的主观和客观乳腺癌风险。根据被招募人群的特征和邀请时间,可能需要不同类型的招募策略。

相似文献

1
Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial. Who participates? Who declines? High Risk Breast Cancer Consortium.参与一项女性乳腺癌风险咨询试验。谁参与了?谁拒绝了?高危乳腺癌联盟。
Cancer. 1996 Jun 1;77(11):2348-55. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2348::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-W.
2
Recruiting high risk women into a breast cancer health promotion trial.招募高危女性参与一项乳腺癌健康促进试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Apr-May;3(3):271-6.
3
Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions.参与乳腺癌易感性检测方案:招募来源、利他主义及家庭参与对女性决策的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Apr;8(4 Pt 2):377-83.
4
Participation in breast cancer risk counseling among women with a family history.有家族病史的女性参与乳腺癌风险咨询情况。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Jul;8(7):581-5.
5
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
6
Breast cancer risk assessment in a mammography screening program and participation in the IBIS-II chemoprevention trial.在乳腺 X 光筛查计划中进行乳腺癌风险评估以及参与 IBIS-II 化学预防试验。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 May;121(1):101-10. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0845-8. Epub 2010 Mar 21.
7
Breast cancer prevention in community clinics: will low-income Latina patients participate in clinical trials?社区诊所中的乳腺癌预防:低收入拉丁裔患者会参与临床试验吗?
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.004.
8
Psychological and clinical factors implicated in decision making about a trial of low-dose tamoxifen in hormone replacement therapy users.与激素替代疗法使用者中低剂量他莫昔芬试验决策相关的心理和临床因素。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 20;26(9):1537-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6739.
9
Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性:定制的遗传咨询干预对风险认知、知识及绝经治疗决策的影响
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):843-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.843.
10
The effect of physician recommendation on enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Trial.医生推荐对乳腺癌化学预防试验入组情况的影响。
Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 1):713-9. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0349.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.在初级保健中使用带有决策支持的患者录入式家族健康史工具:识别风险增加患者对遗传咨询就诊率的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2015 Feb;24(1):179-88. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9753-0. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
2
Sociodemographic Characteristics, Distance to the Clinic, and Breast Cancer Screening Results.社会人口学特征、到诊所的距离与乳腺癌筛查结果
J Health Dispar Res Pract. 2013 Spring;6(1):70.
3
Concerns about inherited risk of breast cancer prior to diagnosis in Japanese patients with breast complaints.
在日本有乳腺疾病主诉的患者中,在做出诊断之前,对乳腺癌遗传风险的担忧。
Fam Cancer. 2011 Dec;10(4):681-9. doi: 10.1007/s10689-011-9464-8.
4
The use of family history questionnaires: an examination of genetic risk estimates and genetic testing eligibility in the non-responder population.家族病史问卷的应用:对无反应者群体中遗传风险估计和基因检测适用性的考察
J Genet Couns. 2011 Aug;20(4):355-64. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9359-8. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
5
Recruiting underserved populations to dermatologic research: a systematic review.招募服务不足人群参与皮肤科研究:系统评价。
Int J Dermatol. 2011 Apr;50(4):385-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04813.x.
6
Recruitment and retention of women in a large randomized control trial to reduce repeat preterm births: the Philadelphia Collaborative Preterm Prevention Project.招募和保留女性参与一项大型随机对照试验,以减少重复早产:费城合作早产预防计划。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Sep 29;10:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-88.
7
The impact of jaundice in newborn infants on the length of breastfeeding.新生儿黄疸对母乳喂养时长的影响。
Paediatr Child Health. 2009 Sep;14(7):445-9.
8
Knowledge and accuracy of perceived personal risk in underserved women who are at increased risk of breast cancer.乳腺癌风险增加的服务不足女性对自身风险的认知及准确性
J Cancer Educ. 2010 Dec;25(4):617-23. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0097-7.
9
An experimental test of the effect of incentives on recruitment of ethnically diverse colorectal cancer cases and their first-degree relatives into a research study.一项关于激励措施对招募不同族裔的结直肠癌病例及其一级亲属参与研究的效果的实验测试。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Oct;18(10):2620-5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0299. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌高危家庭决策的预测因素
Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):38-47. doi: 10.1037/a0012714.