Department of Cariology and Restorative Dentistry, Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine, 3200 South University Drive, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328, USA.
J Dent. 2011 Jul;39 Suppl 1:e30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
Adhesive resin cements may go through internal discoloration, which may show-through and affect the appearance of translucent all-ceramic restorations. This in vitro study evaluated the amount of resin cement color change and its effect on the final shade of the all-ceramics.
Three different resin cements in both light and dual-cure forms were included in the study (Nexus-2/Kerr; Appeal/Ivoclar Vivadent; Calibra/Dentsply). All resin cements contained veneered (IPS Empress Esthetic, ETC1 shade, 20 mm × 1 mm ingot discs) and uncovered groups (n=10/group), all luted on white backgrounds (acetalpolyoxymethylene/Delrin(®)). Curing was performed according to ISO standards with a calibrated LED curing-light (Flashlite 1401). Samples were stored in 37°C distilled water at dark. Spectrophotometric baseline color measurements (Color Eye 7000A) were performed from the samples' top surfaces at 24h (D65 illuminator). Samples were subjected to 65 h of accelerated ageing (Atlas Ci4000). Further color measurements from the same areas were recorded in CIELab* coordinates where a ΔE data above 3 was accepted as visible discoloration (OptiviewLite-1.9software). Statistical analysis was performed using a nested random effects model and Tukey's post hoc analysis.
Light-cure groups showed better color stability in all three resins but only in Appeal resin cement, the dual-cure group discolored significantly more (p<0.001). More discoloration was recorded on uncovered cement groups that represented the exposed cement at the margins. There was no visible color change (ΔE>3) through the ceramic surface on any veneered group.
All resin cements showed varying degrees of discoloration after accelerated ageing however their actual color change was partially masked by the ceramic. Dual-cure resin cements may affect aesthetics on restoration margins if directly exposed.
黏结树脂可能会发生内染色,从而透过修复体影响半透明全瓷修复体的美观。本体外研究评估了树脂黏结剂的颜色变化程度及其对全瓷最终颜色的影响。
本研究纳入了三种不同的树脂黏结剂,包括光固化和双固化两种形式(Nexus-2/Kerr;Appeal/Ivoclar Vivadent;Calibra/Dentsply)。所有树脂黏结剂均包含饰面(IPS Empress Esthetic,ETC1 色调,20mm×1mm 铸锭圆盘)和未覆盖组(n=10/组),均黏结于白色背景(缩醛聚甲醛/Delrin(®))上。按照 ISO 标准,使用校准的 LED 光固化灯(Flashlite 1401)进行固化。将样本储存在 37°C 蒸馏水中避光。在 24 小时时,使用分光光度计(Color Eye 7000A)从样本的顶表面进行基线颜色测量(D65 照明器)。样本进行 65 小时的加速老化(Atlas Ci4000)。在同一区域记录进一步的颜色测量值,并在 CIELab*坐标中记录,其中接受 ΔE 值大于 3 作为可见变色(OptiviewLite-1.9 软件)。使用嵌套随机效应模型和 Tukey 事后分析进行统计分析。
在所有三种树脂中,光固化组的颜色稳定性更好,但只有在 Appeal 树脂黏结剂中,双固化组的变色程度显著更高(p<0.001)。在未覆盖的黏结剂组中记录到更多的变色,这代表了边缘暴露的黏结剂。在任何饰面组中,都没有通过陶瓷表面观察到可见的颜色变化(ΔE>3)。
所有树脂黏结剂在加速老化后均显示出不同程度的变色,但它们的实际颜色变化部分被陶瓷掩盖。如果直接暴露,双固化树脂黏结剂可能会影响修复体边缘的美观。