• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

T1 期非小细胞肺癌的淋巴结受累:葡萄糖摄取和最大直径可否作为预测标准?

Lymph node involvement in T1 non-small-cell lung cancer: could glucose uptake and maximal diameter be predictive criteria?

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(4):e38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.059. Epub 2011 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.059
PMID:21242094
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The introduction of modern staging systems such as computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) with fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) has increased the detection of small peripheral lung cancers at an early stage. We analyzed the behavior of pathological T1 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to identify criteria predictive of nodal involvement, and the role of cancer size in lymph node metastases.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 219 patients with pathological T1 NSCLC. All patients were staged by high-resolution CT and PET as stage I, and underwent anatomical resection and radical lymphadenectomy. Our data were collected based on pathological nodule size (0-10 mm; 11-20 mm; and 21-30 mm); morphological features of lung nodule and FDG uptake of the tumor measured by standardized uptake value (SUV).

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients (87%) were pN0, 14 (6%) pN1, and 15 (7%) pN2. No nodal involvement was observed in any of the 62 patients with nodule size less than 10 mm, in 20 out of 120 patients (17%) with nodule size 11-20 mm, and in nine out of 37 tumors (28%) 21-30 mm in size (p=0.0007). All 55 patients with nodule SUV<2.0 and all 26 non-solid lesions were pN0 (respectively, p=0.0001 and p=0.03). All nodal metastases occurred among the group of 132 patients with size larger than 10 mm and SUV higher than 2.0 with a 22% rate of nodal involvement of (29 patients) (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The low probability of lymph node involvement in NSCLC <1 cm or showing glucose uptake <2 suggests lymphadenectomy could be avoided. A randomized trial should be performed to validate our data.

摘要

目的

计算机断层扫描(CT)和正电子发射断层扫描/CT(PET/CT)与氟代脱氧葡萄糖([(18)F]FDG)的引入提高了早期小周边型肺癌的检出率。我们分析了病理 T1 非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的行为,以确定预测淋巴结受累的标准,并确定肿瘤大小在淋巴结转移中的作用。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 219 例病理 T1 NSCLC 患者。所有患者均通过高分辨率 CT 和 PET 分期为 I 期,并进行解剖性肺切除术和根治性淋巴结清扫术。我们的数据是基于病理结节大小(0-10mm;11-20mm;21-30mm)、肺结节的形态特征和肿瘤的标准化摄取值(SUV)摄取进行收集的。

结果

共有 190 例(87%)患者为 pN0,14 例(6%)为 pN1,15 例(7%)为 pN2。在结节大小小于 10mm 的 62 例患者中,无一例发生淋巴结转移,结节大小为 11-20mm 的 120 例患者中有 20 例(17%),结节大小为 21-30mm 的 37 例患者中有 9 例(28%)发生淋巴结转移(p=0.0007)。所有结节 SUV<2.0 的 55 例患者和所有非实性病变的 26 例患者均为 pN0(分别为 p=0.0001 和 p=0.03)。所有淋巴结转移均发生在 132 例结节大小大于 10mm 且 SUV 高于 2.0 的患者中,淋巴结受累率为 22%(29 例)(p<0.0001)。

结论

直径<1cm 或葡萄糖摄取<2 的 NSCLC 淋巴结受累的可能性较低,提示可以避免淋巴结清扫。应进行随机试验来验证我们的数据。

相似文献

1
Lymph node involvement in T1 non-small-cell lung cancer: could glucose uptake and maximal diameter be predictive criteria?T1 期非小细胞肺癌的淋巴结受累:葡萄糖摄取和最大直径可否作为预测标准?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(4):e38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.059. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
2
Preoperative intrathoracic lymph node staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography.术前胸内淋巴结分期在非小细胞肺癌患者中的应用:正电子发射断层扫描和计算机断层扫描的准确性。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Sep;36(3):440-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 May 22.
3
The accuracy of integrated PET-CT compared with dedicated PET alone for the staging of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer.与单独使用专用PET相比,集成式PET-CT在非小细胞肺癌患者分期中的准确性。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Sep;78(3):1017-23; discussion 1017-23. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.067.
4
FDG-PET imaging for lymph node staging and pathologic tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描成像用于非小细胞肺癌新辅助治疗后的淋巴结分期及肿瘤病理反应评估
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Apr;12(2):89-94.
5
Risk factors for occult mediastinal metastases in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer.临床 I 期非小细胞肺癌隐匿性纵隔转移的危险因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jul;84(1):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.081.
6
Prognostic value of the quantitative metabolic volumetric measurement on 18F-FDG PET/CT in Stage IV nonsurgical small-cell lung cancer.18F-FDG PET/CT 定量代谢体积测量在 IV 期非手术小细胞肺癌中的预后价值。
Acad Radiol. 2012 Jan;19(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.08.020.
7
Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for lymph node staging in non-small-cell lung cancers.18F-FDG PET/CT 对非小细胞肺癌淋巴结分期的准确性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Aug 5;122(15):1749-54.
8
Comparison of clinical and surgical-pathological staging in IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients.IIIa 期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床与手术病理分期比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jan;19(1):89-93. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1895-9. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
9
Clinicopathologic study of resected, peripheral, small-sized, non-small cell lung cancer tumors of 2 cm or less in diameter: pleural invasion and increase of serum carcinoembryonic antigen level as predictors of nodal involvement.直径2厘米及以下的周围型小尺寸非小细胞肺癌肿瘤切除标本的临床病理研究:胸膜侵犯及血清癌胚抗原水平升高作为淋巴结受累的预测指标
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):988-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.035.
10
Screening-detected lung cancers: is systematic nodal dissection always essential?筛查检出的肺癌:系统淋巴结清扫是否总是必要?
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Mar;6(3):525-30. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206dbcc.

引用本文的文献

1
Additional Value of PET and CT Image-Based Features in the Detection of Occult Lymph Node Metastases in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.PET和CT图像特征在肺癌隐匿性淋巴结转移检测中的附加价值:文献系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;13(13):2153. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132153.
2
Preoperative Hilar and Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Suspected or Diagnosed Lung Cancer: Accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT:A Retrospective Cohort Study of 138 Patients.疑似或确诊肺癌患者术前肺门及纵隔淋巴结分期:18F-FDG-PET/CT的准确性:一项对138例患者的回顾性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 22;13(3):403. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030403.
3
Strategies of Lymph Node Dissection During Sublobar Resection for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.
早期肺癌肺叶下切除术中淋巴结清扫策略
Front Surg. 2021 Sep 23;8:725005. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.725005. eCollection 2021.
4
Preoperative predictors of lymph node metastasis in clinical T1 adenocarcinoma.临床T1期腺癌淋巴结转移的术前预测因素
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2352-2360. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.74.
5
Risk analyses of N2 lymph-node metastases in patients with T1 non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center real-world observational study in China.中国多中心真实世界观察性研究:T1 期非小细胞肺癌患者 N2 淋巴结转移的风险分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov;145(11):2771-2777. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03006-x. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
6
Current role of standardized uptake value-derived ratios in N2 fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography non-small cell lung cancer.标准化摄取值衍生比值在N2期氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描非小细胞肺癌中的当前作用
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(1):503-507. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.137.
7
Impact of maximum standardized uptake value of non-small cell lung cancer on detecting lymph node involvement in potential stereotactic body radiotherapy candidates.非小细胞肺癌最大标准化摄取值对潜在立体定向体部放疗候选者淋巴结受累检测的影响
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Apr;9(4):1023-1031. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.71.
8
Association of lymph node involvement with the prognosis of pathological T1 invasive non-small cell lung cancer.淋巴结受累与病理T1期浸润性非小细胞肺癌预后的相关性
World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar 17;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12957-017-1098-3.
9
Does less equal more? The curious issue of small-sized lung cancer.少即多?小尺寸肺癌的奇特问题。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2391-2393. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.84.
10
Risk Factors for Predicting Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Staged by Integrated Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.通过氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描综合分期的临床I期非小细胞肺癌患者隐匿性淋巴结转移的预测危险因素
World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2976-2983. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3652-5.