Rezak Amy, Abbas Hussain M A, Ajemian Michael S, Dudrick Stanley J, Kwasnik Edward M
Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Arch Surg. 2011 Jan;146(1):64-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.297.
Use of a modified clinical grading score improves accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis in the pediatric population while decreasing the use of computed tomography (CT).
Retrospective medical records review after approval by the institutional review board. We determined the Alvarado score for each patient and correlated it with the pathological findings and imaging studies to evaluate the efficacy of CT and its attendant radiation exposure.
Community teaching hospital.
Sixty-one patients, aged 3 to 16 years, admitted with suspected acute appendicitis.
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the modified Alvarado scoring system.
The standard Alvarado score for acute appendicitis had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 82%, with an accuracy of 92%. In the modified Alvarado scoring system, CT findings were substituted for Alvarado scores in the ranges of 5 or 6, 5 to 7, 5 to 8, and 5 to 9. The modification resulted in the greatest accuracy (98%) in diagnosing appendicitis in patients with scores in the range of 5 to 7. This modification theoretically would have decreased the use of CT by about 27% in this group of retrospectively studied patients. Furthermore, in patients with Alvarado scores of 1 to 4, another diagnosis should be considered; in patients with scores of 5 to 7, CT should be performed; and, in patients with scores of 8 to 10, an appendectomy should be performed promptly without further studies.
The modified Alvarado score is useful as an aid in diagnosing acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. This scoring system eliminates unnecessary use of CT and the attendant potential cancer-inducing radiation in the pediatric population.
使用改良的临床分级评分可提高儿科人群急性阑尾炎诊断的准确性,同时减少计算机断层扫描(CT)的使用。
经机构审查委员会批准后进行回顾性病历审查。我们确定了每位患者的阿尔瓦拉多评分,并将其与病理结果和影像学检查相关联,以评估CT的疗效及其伴随的辐射暴露。
社区教学医院。
61名年龄在3至16岁之间、因疑似急性阑尾炎入院的患者。
改良阿尔瓦拉多评分系统的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
急性阑尾炎的标准阿尔瓦拉多评分敏感性为92%,特异性为82%,准确性为92%。在改良的阿尔瓦拉多评分系统中,将CT结果替代阿尔瓦拉多评分范围为5或6、5至7、5至8和5至9的情况。这种改良在诊断评分为5至7的患者阑尾炎时准确性最高(98%)。从理论上讲,在这组回顾性研究的患者中,这种改良将使CT的使用减少约27%。此外,阿尔瓦拉多评分为1至4的患者应考虑其他诊断;评分为5至7的患者应进行CT检查;评分为8至10的患者应立即进行阑尾切除术,无需进一步检查。
改良的阿尔瓦拉多评分有助于诊断儿科人群的急性阑尾炎。该评分系统消除了儿科人群中CT的不必要使用以及随之而来的潜在致癌辐射。