Peng Angela, Dodson Kelley M, Thacker Leroy R, Kierce Jeannette, Shapiro Jay, Baldassari Cristina M
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jan;137(1):42-6. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.230.
To compare the use of flexible laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube (ETT) in pediatric adenotonsillectomy.
Prospective randomized trial.
Tertiary care hospital.
One hundred thirty-one children (aged 2-12 years). Exclusion criteria were body mass index (calculated as the weight in kilograms divided by the height in meters squared) greater than 35 and craniofacial anomalies. Obstructive sleep apnea was the most common indication for surgery.
Children undergoing adenotonsillectomy were randomized to use of an LMA or ETT. A standardized anesthesia protocol was used.
Primary outcome measure was laryngospasm. Secondary measures included anesthesia, operative, and recovery times.
Sixty children were randomized to the LMA group and 71 to the ETT group. There was no difference between groups with regard to age (P = .76), ethnicity (P = .75), body mass index (P = .99), or American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (P = .46). Incidence of postoperative laryngospasm between LMA (12.5%) and ETT (9.6%) was similar (P = .77). In 10 patients, the LMA was changed to ETT intraoperatively owing to tube kinking or difficulty with visualization. Mean (SD) surgical times for LMA and ETT groups were 33.35 (13.39) and 37.76 (18.26) minutes, respectively (P = .15). Time from surgery end to extubation was significantly shorter in patients who used LMA (P = .01) by 4.06 minutes. There were no differences (P = .49) in postanesthesia care unit recovery times.
An LMA is an efficient alternative to ETT in pediatric adenotonsillectomy. When comparing LMA and ETT, there is no difference in rates of laryngospasm. Time to extubation is significantly shorter in patients using LMA. Before adopting the routine use of LMA in pediatric adenotonsillectomy, further study is needed to address visualization and kinking issues associated with this device.
比较小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术中使用可弯曲喉罩气道(LMA)和气管内插管(ETT)的情况。
前瞻性随机试验。
三级医疗中心。
131名儿童(年龄2至12岁)。排除标准为体重指数(计算方法为体重千克数除以身高米数的平方)大于35以及颅面畸形。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停是最常见的手术指征。
接受腺样体扁桃体切除术的儿童被随机分配使用LMA或ETT。采用标准化麻醉方案。
主要观察指标为喉痉挛。次要指标包括麻醉、手术及恢复时间。
60名儿童被随机分配至LMA组,71名被分配至ETT组。两组在年龄(P = 0.76)、种族(P = 0.75)、体重指数(P = 0.99)或美国麻醉医师协会分级(P = 0.46)方面无差异。LMA组(12.5%)和ETT组(9.6%)术后喉痉挛发生率相似(P = 0.77)。10例患者术中因导管扭曲或视野不佳将LMA更换为ETT。LMA组和ETT组的平均(标准差)手术时间分别为33.35(13.39)分钟和37.76(18.26)分钟(P = 0.15)。使用LMA的患者从手术结束到拔管的时间显著缩短(P = 0.01),缩短了4.06分钟。麻醉后护理单元的恢复时间无差异(P = 0.49)。
在小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术中,LMA是ETT的有效替代方法。比较LMA和ETT时,喉痉挛发生率无差异。使用LMA的患者拔管时间显著缩短。在小儿腺样体扁桃体切除术中常规使用LMA之前,需要进一步研究以解决与该设备相关的视野和扭曲问题。