Suppr超能文献

经喉罩气道与气管插管用于腺样体切除术的比较。

Reinforced laryngeal mask airway compared with endotracheal tube for adenotonsillectomies.

机构信息

Departement of Emergency Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Nov;27(11):941-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833d69c6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The endotracheal tube (ETT) has traditionally been considered the best airway device during adenotonsillectomy because a well protected and secured airway is provided. This has been challenged by the introduction of the reinforced laryngeal mask airway (RLMA). It does not kink, is less traumatic during insertion and better tolerated during emergence. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of the RLMA with ETT with regards to postoperative pain, nausea, vomiting and perioperative efficacy in a series of children due for adenotonsillectomy.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-four children, aged 3-16 years and scheduled for ambulatory adenotonsillectomies, were randomly assigned to two groups where the airways were secured with either the ETT (n = 62) or the RLMA (n = 69). We registered the incidence of peroperative and postoperative anaesthesiological complications and time consume, in addition to postoperative pain, nausea and overall satisfaction.

RESULTS

The Group RLMA scored significantly lower for maximal pain during the first 4 h postoperatively (P = 0.015). There were no significant differences in pain scores at 24 h or rescue pain medication postoperatively. The Group RLMA spent mean 4.2 min less in the operating room after surgery (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea. In those patients finally treated with ETT, including five conversions from RLMA, significantly more patients (10 vs. 2) had airway irritations (P < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The RLMA, when feasible, is a well tolerated and effective alternative to the ETT for use during adenotonsillectomies in children, with beneficial effects on airway irritations, operating room efficiency and early postoperative pain.

摘要

背景

传统上,气管内导管(ETT)被认为是腺样体切除术期间最好的气道装置,因为它提供了安全有保障的气道。但随着强化喉罩气道(RLMA)的引入,这一观点受到了挑战。它不易扭曲,插入时创伤较小,苏醒时更能耐受。本研究旨在比较 RLMA 与 ETT 在一系列接受腺样体切除术的儿童中的术后疼痛、恶心、呕吐和围手术期效果。

方法

134 名年龄在 3-16 岁、拟行日间腺样体切除术的儿童被随机分为两组,分别使用 ETT(n = 62)或 RLMA(n = 69)固定气道。我们记录了术中及术后麻醉并发症的发生率和时间消耗,以及术后疼痛、恶心和总体满意度。

结果

RLMA 组术后 4 小时内最大疼痛评分显著降低(P = 0.015)。24 小时或术后止痛药物的疼痛评分无显著差异。RLMA 组手术后在手术室的平均时间减少了 4.2 分钟(P = 0.001)。术后恶心无显著差异。最终使用 ETT 的患者中,包括 5 例从 RLMA 转为 ETT 的患者,气道刺激的患者明显更多(10 例 vs. 2 例)(P < 0.02)。

结论

RLMA 在可行的情况下,是一种可耐受的、有效的 ETT 替代方法,用于儿童腺样体切除术,对气道刺激、手术室效率和术后早期疼痛有有益的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验