Suppr超能文献

血清中新蝶呤、组织多肽特异性抗原和 CA19-9 水平在胰腺癌和慢性胰腺炎鉴别诊断中的临床价值。

Clinical value of serum neopterin, tissue polypeptide-specific antigen and CA19-9 levels in differential diagnosis between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.

机构信息

Department of Digestive Tract Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Pancreatology. 2010;10(6):689-94. doi: 10.1159/000320693. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neopterin and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) have been suggested to be useful in differential diagnosis between pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) and chronic pancreatitis (CP). The aim of our study was to compare the clinical usefulness of CA19-9, neopterin and TPS serum levels in patients with PA and CP.

METHODS

The study included 85 patients with PA, 72 with CP and 50 healthy controls. The serum concentrations of neopterin, TPS and CA19-9 were measured (DRG International, USA). The associations of the analyzed markers and clinical data at diagnosis have been evaluated.

RESULTS

Serum levels of neopterin, TPS and CA19-9 were higher in PA patients compared to CP (p < 0.001). TPS and CA19-9 levels were also elevated in patients with CP compared to the control group (p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no difference between neopterin serum levels in CP patients and the control group (p > 0.05). Neopterin showed the best sensitivity and specificity (91.8 and 87.5%) in PA diagnosis compared to CA19-9 (respectively 83.5 and 75%) and TPS (75.3 and 65.3%).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that neopterin may be potentially useful in differential diagnosis between PA and CP. Assessment of TPS probably adds no significant information to that obtained with CA19-9 and neopterin. and IAP.

摘要

背景

已有人提出,新型蝶呤和组织多肽特异性抗原(TPS)在胰腺腺癌(PA)和慢性胰腺炎(CP)的鉴别诊断中具有一定的作用。本研究旨在比较 CA19-9、新型蝶呤和 TPS 血清水平在 PA 和 CP 患者中的临床应用价值。

方法

研究纳入 85 例 PA 患者、72 例 CP 患者和 50 例健康对照者。检测新型蝶呤、TPS 和 CA19-9 血清浓度(DRG International,美国)。评估分析标志物与诊断时临床资料的相关性。

结果

与 CP 患者相比,PA 患者的新型蝶呤、TPS 和 CA19-9 血清水平更高(p<0.001)。CP 患者的 TPS 和 CA19-9 水平也高于对照组(p<0.001)。相反,CP 患者的新型蝶呤血清水平与对照组之间无差异(p>0.05)。与 CA19-9(分别为 83.5%和 75%)和 TPS(分别为 75.3%和 65.3%)相比,新型蝶呤在 PA 诊断中具有最佳的敏感性和特异性(91.8%和 87.5%)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,新型蝶呤可能有助于 PA 和 CP 的鉴别诊断。TPS 的评估可能不会为 CA19-9 和新型蝶呤的检测提供显著的补充信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验