• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在各州对堕胎公共资金进行限制后活产率和堕胎率的趋势。

Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.

作者信息

Korenbrot C C, Brindis C, Priddy F

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Health Policy Research, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0936.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 1990 Nov-Dec;105(6):555-62.

PMID:2124355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1580169/
Abstract

Abortion rates rose following the expanded legalization of abortion by the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade. As a result, the impact of the restriction on Federal funding of abortions under the Hyde Amendment in 1977 was not clear. However, abortion rates had plateaued by 1985, when State funding of Medicaid abortions was restricted in Colorado, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. Analysis of statewide data from the three States indicated that following restrictions on State funding of abortions, the proportion of reported pregnancies resulting in births, rather than in abortions, increased in all three States. In 1985, the first year of State restrictions on the use of public funds for abortion, Colorado, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania recorded 1.9 to 2.4 percent increases in the proportion of reported pregnancies resulting in live births, after years of declining rates. With adjustments for underreporting of abortion, there was an overall 1.2 percent rise in the proportion of pregnancies resulting in live births in those States. Nationally the proportion rose only 0.4 percent. By 1987, the three States had experienced increases above 1984 levels of 1.6 to 5.9 percent in the proportion of reported pregnancies resulting in live births. The experiences of the three States can be used in projecting an expected increase in the proportions of reported pregnancies resulting in live births, rather than in abortions, for similar States. A projection for California, for example, showed that an increase could be expected in the first year of restrictions on the use of public funds for abortion of at least 4,000 births, which could be expected largely to affect women of low income.

摘要

随着最高法院在“罗诉韦德案”中的裁决扩大了堕胎合法化范围,堕胎率上升。因此,1977年《海德修正案》对联邦堕胎资金的限制所产生的影响并不明确。然而,到1985年堕胎率趋于平稳,当时科罗拉多州、北卡罗来纳州和宾夕法尼亚州对医疗补助堕胎的州资金进行了限制。对这三个州的全州数据进行分析表明,在对州堕胎资金进行限制后,三个州上报的怀孕后生育而非堕胎的比例均有所增加。1985年,即州限制使用公共资金进行堕胎的第一年,在多年下降之后,科罗拉多州、北卡罗来纳州和宾夕法尼亚州上报的怀孕后活产的比例增加了1.9%至2.4%。经对堕胎漏报情况进行调整后,这些州怀孕后活产的比例总体上升了1.2%。在全国范围内,这一比例仅上升了0.4%。到1987年,这三个州上报的怀孕后活产的比例比1984年的水平高出了1.6%至5.9%。这三个州的经验可用于预测类似州上报的怀孕后活产而非堕胎的比例的预期增长情况。例如,对加利福尼亚州的一项预测显示,在限制使用公共资金进行堕胎的第一年,预计至少会增加4000例分娩,预计这将主要影响低收入女性。

相似文献

1
Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.在各州对堕胎公共资金进行限制后活产率和堕胎率的趋势。
Public Health Rep. 1990 Nov-Dec;105(6):555-62.
2
The economic impact of state restrictions on abortion: parental consent and notification laws and Medicaid funding restrictions.州政府对堕胎的限制所产生的经济影响:父母同意和通知法以及医疗补助资金限制。
J Policy Anal Manage. 1993 Summer;12(3):498-511.
3
Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978.1977 - 1978年美国的堕胎情况
Fam Plann Perspect. 1979 Nov-Dec;11(6):329-41.
4
After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.《海德修正案》之后:1978财年堕胎的公共资金情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 May-Jun;12(3):131-4.
5
Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.1982年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金投入
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 May-Jun;16(3):128-33.
6
The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.限制医疗补助计划对堕胎的资金支持的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 May-Jun;12(3):120-3, 127-30.
7
Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.1994年避孕药具、绝育及堕胎服务的公共资金
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Jul-Aug;28(4):166-73.
8
States rebel against Federal abortion orders.各州反抗联邦政府的堕胎命令。
J Am Health Policy. 1994 Mar-Apr;4(2):6-7.
9
Teenage abortion and pregnancy statistics by state, 1992.1992年按州统计的青少年堕胎与怀孕数据。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 May-Jun;29(3):115-22.
10
Women's reproductive choices: the impact of Medicaid funding restrictions.女性的生殖选择:医疗补助资金限制的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Sep-Oct;29(5):228-33.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of state Medicaid coverage of abortion on people accessing care in three states.州医疗补助计划对堕胎的覆盖范围如何影响三个州人们获得堕胎服务的情况。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):255-268. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12275. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Pennsylvania's birth rates after Medicaid abortion restrictions.宾夕法尼亚州实施医疗补助堕胎限制后的出生率。
Am J Public Health. 1993 Jun;83(6):911-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.6.911.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hyde Amendment in action. How did the restriction of federal funds for abortion affect low-income women?《海德修正案》的实际影响。联邦政府对堕胎资金的限制是如何影响低收入女性的?
JAMA. 1981 Sep 4;246(10):1109-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.246.10.1109.
2
After the Hyde Amendment: public funding for abortion in FY 1978.《海德修正案》之后:1978财年堕胎的公共资金情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 May-Jun;12(3):131-4.
3
The impact of restricting Medicaid financing for abortion.限制医疗补助计划对堕胎的资金支持的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 May-Jun;12(3):120-3, 127-30.
4
Public benefits and costs of government funding for abortion.政府为堕胎提供资金的公共收益与成本。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 May-Jun;18(3):111-8.
5
Response of low income women and abortion facilities to restriction of public funds for abortion: a study of a large metropolitan area.低收入女性及堕胎机构对堕胎公共资金限制的反应:对一个大型都市地区的研究
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):948-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.948.
6
The health impact of restricting public funds for abortion. October 10, 1977--June 10, 1978.限制公共资金用于堕胎对健康的影响。1977年10月10日——1978年6月10日。
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):945-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.945.