• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Response of low income women and abortion facilities to restriction of public funds for abortion: a study of a large metropolitan area.低收入女性及堕胎机构对堕胎公共资金限制的反应：对一个大型都市地区的研究
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):948-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.948.
2
Restriction of federal funds for abortion: 18 months later.联邦资金对堕胎的限制：18个月后。
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):929-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.929.
3
Abortion services in the United States, 1984 and 1985.1984年和1985年美国的堕胎服务情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1987 Mar-Apr;19(2):63-70.
4
The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001.2001年美国堕胎服务的可及性。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;35(1):16-24. doi: 10.1363/3501603.
5
Factors hindering access to abortion services.阻碍获得堕胎服务的因素。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Mar-Apr;27(2):54-9, 87.
6
The health impact of restricting public funds for abortion. October 10, 1977--June 10, 1978.限制公共资金用于堕胎对健康的影响。1977年10月10日——1978年6月10日。
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):945-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.945.
7
Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.美国堕胎的自付费用和保险覆盖范围。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.003.
8
At what cost? Payment for abortion care by U.S. women.付出了什么代价？美国女性堕胎护理的支付方式。
Womens Health Issues. 2013 May-Jun;23(3):e173-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.03.001.
9
The Medicaid cutoff and abortion services for the poor.医疗补助计划的资格终止与为穷人提供的堕胎服务。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 Jul-Aug;16(4):171-2, 177-80.
10
Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects--PHS. Final rules.
Fed Regist. 1988 Feb 2;53(21):2922-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of restricted public funding for legal abortions: a second look.限制合法堕胎公共资金的影响：再审视
Am J Public Health. 1981 Jan;71(1):77-81. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.1.77.
2
Trends in rates of live births and abortions following state restrictions on public funding of abortion.在各州对堕胎公共资金进行限制后活产率和堕胎率的趋势。
Public Health Rep. 1990 Nov-Dec;105(6):555-62.
3
Infant mortality and morbidity in the International Year of the Child.国际儿童年的婴儿死亡率和发病率
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):852-4. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.852.
4
Restriction of federal funds for abortion: 18 months later.联邦资金对堕胎的限制：18个月后。
Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):929-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.929.

本文引用的文献

1
Monthly variation in conceptions leading to induced abortion.
Soc Biol. 1977 Fall;24(3):245-9. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1977.9988287.
2
Abortion in the United States, 1976--1977.1976 - 1977年美国的堕胎情况
Fam Plann Perspect. 1978 Sep-Oct;10(5):271-9.
3
The Court, the Congress and the President: turning back the clock on the pregnant poor.法院、国会和总统：让贫困孕妇的时光倒流。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1977 Sep-Oct;9(5):207-14.

低收入女性及堕胎机构对堕胎公共资金限制的反应：对一个大型都市地区的研究

Response of low income women and abortion facilities to restriction of public funds for abortion: a study of a large metropolitan area.

作者信息

Rubin G L, Gold J, Cates W

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1979 Sep;69(9):948-50. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.9.948.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.69.9.948
PMID:474852
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1619234/
Abstract

During the first five months after the restriction of public funds for abortion, a large percentage of low-income women seeking abortions in a metropolitan area in Texas obtained abortion that were partially subsizied using a combination of reduced clinic fees and public funds for ancillary non-abortion services. Their own personal funds made up the difference between the subsidy and the full cost of the procedure.

摘要

在公共资金限制用于堕胎后的头五个月里，得克萨斯州一个大都市地区大量寻求堕胎的低收入女性通过降低诊所费用和用于辅助非堕胎服务的公共资金相结合的方式，获得了部分补贴的堕胎服务。她们自己的个人资金弥补了补贴与手术全部费用之间的差额。