Vrecko Scott
University of Exeter, UK.
Hist Human Sci. 2010;23(4):52-67. doi: 10.1177/0952695110371598.
This article critically interrogates contemporary forms of addiction medicine that are portrayed by policy-makers as providing a "rational" or politically neutral approach to dealing with drug use and related social problems. In particular, it examines the historical origins of the biological facts that are today understood to provide a foundation for contemporary understandings of addiction as a "disease of the brain." Drawing upon classic and contemporary work on "styles of thought," it documents how, in the period between the mid-1960s and the mid 1970s, such facts emerged in relation to new neurobiological styles of explaining and managing social problems associated with drug abuse, and an alliance between a relatively marginal group of researchers and American policy-makers who were launching the "War on Drugs." Beyond illustrating the political and material conditions necessary for the rise of addiction neuroscience, the article highlights the productivity of neurobiological thought styles, by focusing on the new biological objects, treatments and hopes that have emerged within the field of addiction studies over the last several decades.
本文批判性地审视了当代成瘾医学的形式,政策制定者将其描绘为提供一种“理性”或政治中立的方法来应对药物使用及相关社会问题。特别是,它考察了当今被视为为当代将成瘾理解为“脑部疾病”提供基础的生物学事实的历史起源。借鉴关于“思维方式”的经典和当代著作,本文记录了在20世纪60年代中期至70年代中期期间,这些事实是如何与解释和管理与药物滥用相关的社会问题的新神经生物学思维方式以及一群相对边缘化的研究人员与发起“毒品战争”的美国政策制定者之间的联盟相关联而出现的。除了说明成瘾神经科学兴起所需的政治和物质条件外,本文还通过关注过去几十年来成瘾研究领域中出现的新生物学对象、治疗方法和希望,突出了神经生物学思维方式的成效。