University of Jilin, Changchun, China.
Dev Psychol. 2011 Jan;47(1):226-32. doi: 10.1037/a0021306.
The present study examined the role of controlled attention in age differences in event-based prospective memory performance across adolescence. The researchers tested whether presenting the prospective memory cue in or out of focal awareness of the ongoing task (resulting in low versus high demands for controlled attention, respectively) might affect age-related prospective memory performance. In total, 119 Chinese participants ages 13 to 20 took part in this study (60 adolescents: age M = 13.26 years, SD = 0.50; 23 boys; 59 young adults: age M = 19.70 years, SD = 0.87; 19 men). Findings demonstrated a significant interaction, F(1, 114) = 6.41, p < .05. No effect of age on prospective memory performance was revealed when a focal cue was used (F < 1), whereas there was a reliable age effect between adolescents and young adults when nonfocal prospective memory cues were presented, F(1, 59) = 16.13, p < .01. This pattern of results suggests that the interplay of both available resources of controlled attention and working memory, along with specific task demands, may contribute to possible age differences in prospective memory performance across adolescence. Results are discussed in the context of the multiprocess theory of prospective memory.
本研究考察了在青少年时期,基于事件的前瞻性记忆表现的年龄差异中,控制性注意的作用。研究人员测试了在进行中的任务的焦点意识内或外呈现前瞻性记忆提示(分别导致低要求和高要求的控制性注意)是否会影响与年龄相关的前瞻性记忆表现。共有 119 名年龄在 13 至 20 岁的中国参与者参加了这项研究(60 名青少年:年龄 M = 13.26 岁,SD = 0.50;23 名男性;59 名年轻人:年龄 M = 19.70 岁,SD = 0.87;19 名男性)。研究结果表明存在显著的交互作用,F(1, 114) = 6.41,p <.05。当使用焦点提示时,前瞻性记忆表现没有年龄效应(F < 1),而当呈现非焦点前瞻性记忆提示时,青少年和年轻人之间存在可靠的年龄效应,F(1, 59) = 16.13,p <.01。这种结果模式表明,控制性注意和工作记忆的可用资源以及特定任务要求的相互作用可能导致青少年时期前瞻性记忆表现的年龄差异。结果在前瞻性记忆的多过程理论背景下进行了讨论。