Suppr超能文献

两种类型的混合前瞻记忆的加工机制

The Processing Mechanisms of Two Types of Mixed Prospective Memory.

作者信息

Gan Jiaqun, Guo Yunfei, Wang Enguo

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:792852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792852. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Mixed prospective memory (MPM) needs to be executed when both external time and event cues appear. According to the clarity of time cues, MPM can be further divided into two types: time-point MPM and time-period MPM. There is no research on these two types of MPM. Whether existing theories of EBPM can explain its processing mechanisms is worth exploring. The current study was aimed at examining the differences in attentional allocation characteristics between these two types of MPM and EBPM under different difficult ongoing tasks. The results showed that the attention consumption of the two types of MPM groups was less than that of the EBPM group in the early and middle stages of high cognitive load, but there was no difference between the three groups in the later stage of the task. The attention distribution of time-point MPM and time-period MPM displayed dynamic changes: the time-point MPM only had attention consumption in the later stage, while the time-period MPM also existed in the early and middle stages. These results support dynamic multiprocess theory.

摘要

混合前瞻记忆(MPM)需要在外部时间和事件线索同时出现时执行。根据时间线索的清晰度,MPM可进一步分为两种类型:时间点MPM和时间段MPM。目前尚无关于这两种类型MPM的研究。现有基于事件的前瞻记忆(EBPM)理论能否解释其加工机制值得探讨。本研究旨在考察在不同难度的持续任务下,这两种类型的MPM与EBPM在注意分配特征上的差异。结果表明,在高认知负荷的早期和中期,两种类型的MPM组的注意消耗均低于EBPM组,但在任务后期三组之间没有差异。时间点MPM和时间段MPM的注意分配呈现动态变化:时间点MPM仅在后期存在注意消耗,而时间段MPM在早期和中期也存在。这些结果支持动态多加工理论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd07/8716547/a51c1d88c0bb/fpsyg-12-792852-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验