Centre for Periodontology and Implantology, Leuven, Heverlee, BelgiumDepartment of Periodontology, Centre for Oral Health Sciences, Malmö University, Malmö, SwedenDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, BelgiumDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1111-1116. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02077.x. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
Chemically modified surfaces were introduced during the last decade to improve indications for implant treatment. The fluoride-modified implant (Osseospeed(®)) was launched in 2004 and clinical studies suggest a more rapid bone formation and stronger bone to implant contact. However, limited clinical data are available on marginal bone loss and the outcome after >1 year under immediate loading conditions is not fully understood. Hence, the purpose of this prospective study was to present implant survival and marginal bone level data when fluoride-modified implants are supporting a fully functional rehabilitation from the day after surgery in the completely edentulous mandible.
Twenty-five patients, completely edentulous in the mandible, were consecutively treated with five fluoride-modified implants that were functionally loaded with a provisional screw retained restoration. Marginal bone loss was measured from day of surgery to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Implants were considered successful after 24 months if radiographic bone loss did not exceed 1 mm and no pain or mobility was caused under a torque of 20 N cm. Statistical analysis was carried out on both patient and implant levels.
All implants survived and mean bone loss on implant level after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months was 0.14, 0.13, 0.11 and 0.11 mm, respectively. Bone loss was only statistically significant between baseline and 3 months (P<0.001) and remained unchanged afterward. None of the implants lost >1 mm of bone after 2 years. On the patient level, the mean bone loss after 2 years was 0.12 mm (SD 0.14; range -0.06 to 0.55) with probing pocket depth 2.45 mm (SD 0.43; range 1.3-3.1) and bleeding index 0.55% (SD 0.34; range 0-1).
Immediate loading of fluoride-modified implants is a predictable treatment yielding a high survival and success rate after 2 years.
在过去十年中,人们引入了化学改性表面来改善种植体治疗的适应证。氟化物改性种植体(Osseospeed(®))于 2004 年推出,临床研究表明其具有更快的骨形成和更强的骨-种植体结合。然而,关于边缘骨丧失的临床数据有限,对于在即刻负重条件下超过 1 年的结果还不完全了解。因此,本前瞻性研究的目的是在完全无牙的下颌骨中,从手术后的第二天起,当氟化物改性种植体支持完全功能性修复时,报告种植体存活率和边缘骨水平数据。
25 名下颌完全无牙的患者,连续接受 5 个氟化物改性种植体的治疗,这些种植体用临时螺丝固定的修复体进行功能加载。从手术当天到 3、6、12 和 24 个月时测量边缘骨丧失。如果在 20 N cm 的扭矩下没有出现超过 1 毫米的放射状骨丧失和疼痛或松动,则在 24 个月后认为种植体成功。对患者和种植体两个层面进行了统计学分析。
所有种植体均存活,种植体水平的平均骨丢失在 3、6、12 和 24 个月时分别为 0.14、0.13、0.11 和 0.11 毫米。仅在基线和 3 个月之间的骨丢失具有统计学意义(P<0.001),此后保持不变。在 2 年后,没有任何种植体丢失超过 1 毫米的骨量。在患者层面,2 年后的平均骨丢失为 0.12 毫米(SD 0.14;范围 -0.06 至 0.55),探测袋深度为 2.45 毫米(SD 0.43;范围 1.3-3.1),出血指数为 0.55%(SD 0.34;范围 0-1)。
氟化物改性种植体的即刻负载是一种可预测的治疗方法,在 2 年后具有较高的存活率和成功率。