Intensive Care Unit, National Research Centre for Surgery, Russian Academy of Medical Science, Moscow, Russian Federation.
ASAIO J. 2010 Nov-Dec;56(6):522-6. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3181effdf8.
Assessment of cardiac output (CO) is crucial in the management of the critically ill, especially in post cardiac surgery intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In this study, we validated CO measured by the novel ultrasound dilution (COUD) with those measured by pulmonary artery (PA) thermodilution (COTD) in 26 adult post cardiac surgery patients. For COUD, blood was circulated through an extracorporeal arteriovenous (AV) loop from the radial artery catheter to the introducer of PA catheter for 5-8 minutes. Three to four injections of 25 ml body temperature isotonic saline were performed into the venous limb of the AV loop. For COTD, five injections of 10 ml ice cold saline were performed. A total of 77 COUD and COTD measurement sets were compared. Cardiac output measured by thermodilution ranged from 3.28 to 9.4 L/min, whereas COUD ranged from 2.85 to 10.1 L/min. The correlation between the methods was found to be r = 0.91, COUD = 0.93(COTD) + 0.42 L/min. Bias and precision (mean difference ± 2SDs) was -0.004 ± 1.34 L/min between the two methods. The percentage error (2SD/mean) was 22.2%, which is below the clinically acceptable limit (<30%). Cardiac output measured by ultrasound dilution and thermodilution methods agreed well in post cardiac surgery ICU patients and hence can be interchangeably used.
心输出量(CO)的评估在危重病患者的管理中至关重要,尤其是在心脏手术后的重症监护病房(ICU)患者中。在这项研究中,我们在 26 例成年心脏手术后患者中验证了新型超声稀释(COUD)和肺动脉(PA)热稀释(COTD)测量的 CO。对于 COUD,血液通过从桡动脉导管到 PA 导管导入器的体外动静脉(AV)回路循环 5-8 分钟。在 AV 回路的静脉肢体中进行 3-4 次 25 毫升体温等渗盐水注射。对于 COTD,进行 5 次 10 毫升冰冷生理盐水注射。总共比较了 77 次 COUD 和 COTD 测量集。热稀释法测量的 CO 范围为 3.28 至 9.4 L/min,而 COUD 范围为 2.85 至 10.1 L/min。两种方法之间的相关性被发现为 r = 0.91,COUD = 0.93(COTD)+0.42 L/min。两种方法之间的偏差和精度(平均差值±2SDs)为 -0.004±1.34 L/min。误差百分比(2SD/均值)为 22.2%,低于临床可接受的限制(<30%)。心脏手术后 ICU 患者中,超声稀释法和热稀释法测量的 CO 一致性良好,因此可以互换使用。