• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修复症状性巨大食管裂孔疝(>70 岁)可改善患者的生活质量。

Repair of symptomatic giant paraesophageal hernias in elderly (>70 years) patients results in improved quality of life.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, Suite 850, 1101 Madison Street, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):389-96. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1324-6. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11605-010-1324-6
PMID:21246416
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Giant paraesophageal hernias (PEH) involve herniation ofstomach and/or other viscera into the mediastinum. These are usually symptomatic and commonly occur in the elderly. The benefits and risks of operating on elderly patients with giant PEH have not been clearly elucidated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients aged 70 or greater with giant PEHs undergoing repair.Quality of life data were gathered using QOLRAD, GERD-HRQL and adysphagia severity score.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (34 females), median 78 years old, presented for repair. Nine patients presented urgently. There was no 30-day mortality. Major morbidity was 15.5%. At mean follow-up of 1.3 years, 81% were symptom free compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). Both short-term (p < 0.001) and long term QOLRAD (p < 0.001) scores improved significantly, as did GERD HRQL scores (p < 0.001). Dysphagia scores worsened in the short term but returned to baseline at long term follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic giant PEH in this elderly population can be repaired with symptomatic improvement, minimal morbidity and mortality in both the elective and urgent setting. The decision to operate should be made by a physician experienced in managing this complex patient population.

摘要

简介

巨大食管裂孔疝(PEH)是指胃和/或其他内脏疝入纵隔。这些疝通常是有症状的,常见于老年人。对于老年巨大 PEH 患者,手术的获益和风险尚未明确。

材料与方法

我们对连续接受巨大 PEH 修补术的 70 岁及以上患者进行了回顾性图表审查。使用 QOLRAD、GERD-HRQL 和吞咽困难严重程度评分收集生活质量数据。

结果

58 名患者(34 名女性),中位年龄 78 岁,接受了修复。9 名患者紧急就诊。30 天内无死亡病例。主要发病率为 15.5%。平均随访 1.3 年后,81%的患者与基线相比无症状(p < 0.0001)。短期(p < 0.001)和长期 QOLRAD(p < 0.001)评分均显著改善,GERD HRQL 评分也显著改善(p < 0.001)。短期吞咽困难评分恶化,但长期随访时恢复到基线。

结论

在这个老年人群中,有症状的巨大食管裂孔疝可以通过手术修复来缓解症状,无论在择期还是紧急情况下,其发病率和死亡率均较低。是否进行手术应由经验丰富的医生来决定,以管理这一复杂的患者群体。

相似文献

1
Repair of symptomatic giant paraesophageal hernias in elderly (>70 years) patients results in improved quality of life.修复症状性巨大食管裂孔疝(>70 岁)可改善患者的生活质量。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Mar;15(3):389-96. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1324-6. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
2
Repair of symptomatic paraesophageal hernias in elderly (>70 years) patients results in sustained quality of life at 5 years and beyond.在 >70 岁的老年患者中,修补症状性食管裂孔疝可在 5 年及以后持续改善生活质量。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):3979-3984. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5432-1. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: quality of life outcomes in the elderly.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术:老年人的生活质量结局
Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(8):737-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00831.x. Epub 2008 May 2.
4
Comparison of patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease or paraesophageal hernia.腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术治疗胃食管反流病或食管旁疝后以患者为中心的结局比较。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):343-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9628-7. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
5
Omission of preoperative esophageal manometry does not alter operative approach or postoperative dysphagia following laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair.术前未进行食管测压并不改变腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术后的手术方式或术后吞咽困难情况。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jul 1;30(7):1-6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox044.
6
Functional results after hiatal repair and gastropexy without fundoplication in patients with paraoesophageal hernia.食管裂孔疝患者行裂孔修补和胃固定术而不行抗反流手术的功能结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 May 3;409(1):150. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03340-w.
7
Laparoscopic revision paraesophageal hernia repair: a 16-year experience at a single institution.腹腔镜下复发性食管旁疝修补术:一家机构16年的经验
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):624-630. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09359-8. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
8
Mid term analysis of safety and quality of life after the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia.腹腔镜修复食管旁裂孔疝后安全性及生活质量的中期分析
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1045-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9227-1. Epub 2004 Jun 10.
9
The laparoscopic Nissen-Hill hybrid: pilot study of a combined antireflux procedure.腹腔镜尼森-希尔杂交术:联合抗反流手术的初步研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1945-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2692-7. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center.高容量转诊中心择期和急诊巨大食管裂孔疝修补术的现代外科治疗结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):284-289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in Older Adults.老年患者机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的分析
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.3038.
2
Safety and Early Clinical Outcomes Following Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia in Octogenarians.八旬老人巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后的安全性及早期临床结局
World J Surg. 2025 May;49(5):1237-1245. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12569. Epub 2025 Apr 13.
3
Could "Low Quality of Life" Rather Than "Significant Symptoms" Be Better Criteria for the Selection of Patients for the Repair of a Giant Hiatus Hernia?

本文引用的文献

1
Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies.食管裂孔疝:临床表现、评估和治疗争议。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2009 Nov;19(4):473-84. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2009.08.006.
2
Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair.腹腔镜巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后 10 年的结果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;139(2):395-404, 404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
3
Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged?是否应鼓励择期修复胸内胃?
对于巨大食管裂孔疝修补术患者的选择,“生活质量低下”而非“明显症状”是否可能是更好的标准?
Cureus. 2024 Mar 7;16(3):e55740. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55740. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
EAES Multidisciplinary Rapid Guideline: systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed recommendations on the surgical management of paraesophageal hernias.EAES 多学科快速指南:食管裂孔疝手术治疗的系统评价、荟萃分析、GRADE 评估和循证推荐。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9013-9029. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10511-1. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
5
Development of the ParaOesophageal hernia SympTom (POST) tool.ParaOesophageal 疝症状(POST)工具的开发。
Br J Surg. 2022 Jul 15;109(8):727-732. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac139.
6
Paraesophageal hernia repair in elderly patients: outcomes from a 10-year retrospective study.食管裂孔疝修补术治疗老年患者:一项 10 年回顾性研究的结果。
Can J Surg. 2022 Feb 18;65(1):E121-E127. doi: 10.1503/cjs.017920. Print 2022 Jan-Feb.
7
Quality of life after giant hiatus hernia repair: A systematic review.巨大食管裂孔疝修补术后的生活质量:一项系统评价。
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Oct-Dec;17(4):435-449. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_233_20.
8
Outcomes after Laparoscopic Gastropexy as an Alternative for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.腹腔镜胃固定术作为治疗食管旁疝的一种替代方法的结果。
JSLS. 2020 Oct-Dec;24(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00059.
9
Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Analysis of the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.食管旁疝修补术的结果:退伍军人事务部手术质量改进计划数据库分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Mar;25(3):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04650-2. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robot-assisted emergency treatment of strangulated giant hiatal hernias: report of five cases and literature review.微创腹腔镜和机器人辅助治疗嵌顿性巨大食管裂孔疝:五例报告及文献复习。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jun 1;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00316-1.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Feb;14(2):203-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1106-1. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
4
Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia results in long-term patient satisfaction and a durable repair.腹腔镜修复巨大食管旁疝可带来长期的患者满意度和持久的修复效果。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Dec;12(12):2066-75; discussion 2075-7. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0712-7. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
5
Combined transabdominal gastroplasty and fundoplication for shortened esophagus: impact on reflux-related and overall quality of life.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jun;85(6):1947-52. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.080.
6
Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: quality of life outcomes in the elderly.腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术:老年人的生活质量结局
Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(8):737-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00831.x. Epub 2008 May 2.
7
Primary laparoscopic and open repair of paraesophageal hernias: a comparison of short-term outcomes.食管旁疝的初次腹腔镜修补术与开放修补术:短期疗效比较
Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(1):63-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00740.x.
8
Intermediate-term results of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: lack of follow-up esophagogram leads to detection bias.腹腔镜修补巨大食管旁疝的中期结果:缺乏随访食管造影导致检测偏倚。
JSLS. 2007 Jul-Sep;11(3):344-9.
9
The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument.胃食管反流病-健康相关生活质量症状严重程度量表的研制
Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00658.x.
10
Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.生物假体可降低腹腔镜食管旁疝修补术后的复发率:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2006 Oct;244(4):481-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000237759.42831.03.