Suppr超能文献

高容量转诊中心择期和急诊巨大食管裂孔疝修补术的现代外科治疗结果。

Modern era surgical outcomes of elective and emergency giant paraesophageal hernia repair at a high-volume referral center.

机构信息

Steinberg-Bernstein Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L8-512, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.

Department of Surgery, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Center, 1650 Cedar Avenue, L8-512, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):284-289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06764-4. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Repair of giant paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has historically been associated with significant morbidity and mortality such that elective repair is only offered to symptomatic patients. Recent reports suggest modern era outcomes have improved such that elective repair may now be safer than historically thought. Furthermore, the morbidity of emergency surgery may still be significant. These changes may have important implications for patient selection for elective repair. The objectives of this study were to determine and compare modern era surgical outcomes after elective and emergency repair of giant PEHs at a high-volume tertiary care center.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for all Type II-IV giant PEH repairs performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017. Type 1 hiatal hernias, fundoplication for reflux, and any co-surgery other than cholecystectomy were excluded from the final analysis. Baseline patient demographics, operative details, postoperative complications within 30 days and in-hospital or 30-day mortality were tabulated from the electronic medical record. Data were reported as median (interquartile range) unless otherwise specified.

RESULTS

A total of 352 cases were reviewed, of which 204 met inclusion criteria (18 emergency, 186 elective). Eight had Type II PEH, 146 had Type III, and 50 had Type IV. Median length of stay was shorter in the elective group [1 (1) day elective vs. 5 (7) days emergency, p < 0.0001], and emergency patients were less likely to return directly to their original residence at discharge (13, 72% emergency vs 185, 99.4% elective, p < 0.0001). There were significantly more major complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ 3) in the emergency group (5, 28% emergency vs. 10, 5% elective, p = 0.005). There were no perioperative deaths in either group. Morbidity and mortality in both groups were less than historically reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Informed consent discussions and patient selection for repair of giant PEHs should reflect modern era and institution-specific outcomes.

摘要

简介

巨大食管裂孔疝(PEH)的修复历史上与较高的发病率和死亡率相关,因此仅对有症状的患者进行择期修复。最近的报告表明,现代时代的结果有所改善,以至于择期修复现在可能比历史上认为的更安全。此外,急诊手术的发病率可能仍然很高。这些变化可能对择期修复患者的选择具有重要意义。本研究的目的是确定并比较高容量三级护理中心的巨大食管裂孔疝择期和急诊修复后的现代时代手术结果。

方法

对 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日期间进行的所有 II-IV 型巨大食管裂孔疝修复进行回顾性分析。排除 1 型食管裂孔疝、反流性胃底折叠术以及除胆囊切除术以外的任何联合手术。从电子病历中列出基线患者人口统计学资料、手术细节、术后 30 天内和住院期间或 30 天内死亡率的并发症。数据以中位数(四分位距)报告,除非另有说明。

结果

共回顾了 352 例病例,其中 204 例符合纳入标准(18 例急诊,186 例择期)。8 例为 II 型 PEH,146 例为 III 型,50 例为 IV 型。择期组的中位住院时间更短[1(1)天择期 vs. 5(7)天急诊,p<0.0001],急诊患者出院时更不可能直接返回原籍[13 例,72%急诊 vs. 185 例,99.4%择期,p<0.0001]。急诊组的主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo 评分≥3)明显更多(5 例,28%急诊 vs. 10 例,5%择期,p=0.005)。两组均无围手术期死亡。两组的发病率和死亡率均低于历史报告。

结论

在告知巨大食管裂孔疝修复的知情同意讨论和患者选择时,应反映现代时代和机构特定的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验