Behrashi M, Mahdian M
Faculty of Paramedical and Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Pak J Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 1;11(21):2505-8. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.2505.2508.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and side effects of two different misoprostol regimens for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Sixty women in second trimester of gestation with indications for pregnancy termination were randomly assigned in two equal groups to receive either vaginal or oral misoprostol. The dosing regimen was 400 microg as the initial dose followed by 400 microg up to 3 doses (1200 microg) if needed in each group. Efficacy and side effects were compared. The percentage of women who delivered was significantly higher in vaginal group than the oral group (86.7 vs. 43.3 p = 0.0006). No significant differences in complication rates and induction to delivery interval were noted between the two groups. Vaginal administration of misoprostol resulted in a higher success rate for second trimester pregnancy termination, whereas, no significant differences in induction to delivery time and complication rates were noted between vaginal and oral groups.
本研究的目的是比较两种不同米索前列醇方案用于中期妊娠终止的疗效和副作用。60例有妊娠终止指征的妊娠中期妇女被随机分为两组,每组人数相等,分别接受阴道或口服米索前列醇。给药方案为初始剂量400微克,必要时每组最多追加3剂400微克(共1200微克)。比较疗效和副作用。阴道组分娩的妇女百分比显著高于口服组(86.7%对43.3%,p = 0.0006)。两组间并发症发生率和引产至分娩间隔无显著差异。阴道给药米索前列醇导致中期妊娠终止成功率更高,而阴道组和口服组在引产至分娩时间和并发症发生率方面无显著差异。