Suppr超能文献

针灸治疗原发性痛经

Acupuncture for primary dysmenorrhoea.

作者信息

Smith Caroline A, Zhu Xiaoshu, He Lin, Song Jing

机构信息

Centre for Complementary Medicine Research, The University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, New South Wales, Australia, 2751.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD007854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007854.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This review examined the currently available evidence supporting the use of acupuncture to treat primary dysmenorrhoea.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea when compared with a placebo, no treatment, or conventional medical treatment (for example oral contraceptives and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAIDs)).

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following databases were searched (from inception until March 2010): the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertillity Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Medical Current Content (CMCC), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP database, Dissertation Abstracts International, BIOSIS, AMED (The Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), Acubriefs, and Acubase.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Inclusion criteria included all published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing acupuncture with placebo control, usual care, and pharmacological treatment. The following modes of treatment were included: acupuncture, electro-acupuncture, and acupressure. Participants were women of reproductive age with primary dysmenorrhoea during the majority of the menstrual cycles or for three consecutive menstrual cycles, and moderate to severe symptoms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Meta-analyses were performed using odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Primary outcomes were pain relief and improved menstrual symptoms, measured by self-rating scales. Other outcomes included use of analgesics, quality of life, and absence from school or work.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten trials were included in the review with data reporting on 944 participants. Six trials reported on acupuncture (n = 673) and four trials (n = 271) reported on acupressure. There was an improvement in pain relief from acupuncture compared with a placebo control (OR 9.5, 95% CI 21.17 to 51.8), NSAIDs (SMD -0.70, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.32) and Chinese herbs (SMD -1.34, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.95). In two trials acupuncture reduced menstrual symptoms (for example nausea, back pain) compared with medication (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.53 to 6.86); in one trial acupuncture reduced menstrual symptoms compared with Chinese herbs (OR 7.0, 95% CI 2.22, 22.06); and in one trial acupuncture improved quality of life compared with usual care.There was an improvement in pain relief from acupressure compared with a placebo control (SMD -0.99, 95% CI -1.48 to -0.49), and in one trial acupressure reduced menstrual symptoms compared with a placebo control (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.10). The risk of bias was low in 50% of trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture may reduce period pain, however there is a need for further well-designed randomised controlled trials.

摘要

背景

本综述研究了目前支持使用针灸治疗原发性痛经的现有证据。

目的

与安慰剂、不治疗或传统药物治疗(如口服避孕药和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs))相比,确定针灸治疗原发性痛经的疗效和安全性。

检索策略

检索了以下数据库(从创建至2010年3月):Cochrane月经失调与生育力低下小组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆)、PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国医学现刊(CMCC)、中国知网(CNKI)、维普数据库、国际学位论文摘要、BIOSIS、AMED(补充与替代医学数据库)、Acubriefs和Acubase。

入选标准

入选标准包括所有已发表和未发表的将针灸与安慰剂对照、常规护理和药物治疗进行比较的随机对照试验。纳入以下治疗方式:针灸、电针和指压。参与者为在大多数月经周期或连续三个月经周期患有原发性痛经且症状为中度至重度的育龄妇女。

数据收集与分析

采用比值比(OR)对二分变量结果进行Meta分析,采用均数差或标准化均数差(SMD)对连续变量结果进行Meta分析,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。主要结局指标为通过自评量表测量的疼痛缓解和月经症状改善情况。其他结局指标包括镇痛药的使用、生活质量以及缺课或旷工情况。

主要结果

本综述纳入了10项试验,共944名参与者的数据报告。6项试验报告了针灸情况(n = 673),4项试验(n = 271)报告了指压情况。与安慰剂对照相比,针灸在缓解疼痛方面有改善(OR 9.5,95% CI 21.17至51.8),与NSAIDs相比(SMD -0.70,95% CI -1.08至 -0.32),与中药相比(SMD -1.34,95% CI -1.74至 -0.95)。在两项试验中,与药物治疗相比,针灸减轻了月经症状(如恶心、背痛)(OR 3.25,95% CI 1.53至6.86);在一项试验中,与中药相比,针灸减轻了月经症状(OR 7.0,95% CI 2.22,22.06);在一项试验中,与常规护理相比,针灸改善了生活质量。与安慰剂对照相比,指压在缓解疼痛方面有改善(SMD -0.99,95% CI -1.48至 -0.49),在一项试验中,与安慰剂对照相比,指压减轻了月经症状(SMD -0.58,95% CI -1.06至 -0.10)。50%的试验偏倚风险较低。

作者结论

针灸可能减轻经期疼痛,然而需要进一步设计良好的随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验