Laboratoire de Virologie-Immunologie, EA 4537, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Fort-de-France, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane, 97200 Fort-de-France, Martinique.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;69(2):172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.09.021.
We prospectively evaluated the Bio-Rad nonstructural 1 (NS1) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) in comparison to an in-place reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for dengue diagnosis. Among 537 consecutive samples from patients with acute febrile disease, 264 (49.2%) tested positive in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 156 (29.1%) in NS1-antigen (Ag) ELISA, and 125 (23.3%) in NS1-Ag LFIA. Compared to the RT-PCR status, the specificity was 100% for the NS1-Ag ELISA and LFIA, but their respective sensitivities were 61.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 55.2-67.2] and 49.4% (95% CI, 43.2-55.6), with nadirs of 37.9% and 24.1% on day 6 of illness. The NS1-Ag ELISA and LFIA were positive, respectively, for 48.0% and 40.7% of the secondary infections versus 85.0% and 66.7% of the primary infections. For patients <5 years old, NS1-Ag ELISA and LFIA reached respective sensitivities of 100% and 90.5%. Reports of results of dengue NS1-Ag assays should specify that negativity does not preclude DENV infection, and require further investigations in the case of severe disease.
我们前瞻性地评估了 Bio-Rad 非结构蛋白 1(NS1)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和侧向流动免疫层析测定(LFIA)与原地逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)相比,用于登革热诊断。在 537 例连续就诊的急性发热疾病患者中,264 例(49.2%)在 RT-PCR 中检测为阳性,156 例(29.1%)在 NS1 抗原(Ag)ELISA 中检测为阳性,125 例(23.3%)在 NS1-Ag LFIA 中检测为阳性。与 RT-PCR 状态相比,NS1-Ag ELISA 和 LFIA 的特异性均为 100%,但各自的敏感性分别为 61.2%[95%置信区间(CI),55.2-67.2]和 49.4%(95% CI,43.2-55.6),发病第 6 天的最低点分别为 37.9%和 24.1%。NS1-Ag ELISA 和 LFIA 分别对 48.0%和 40.7%的二次感染呈阳性,而对 85.0%和 66.7%的原发性感染呈阳性。对于<5 岁的患者,NS1-Ag ELISA 和 LFIA 的敏感性分别达到 100%和 90.5%。登革热 NS1-Ag 检测结果的报告应明确指出阴性并不能排除 DENV 感染,并且在发生严重疾病的情况下需要进一步调查。