• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.476:计划中的家庭分娩。

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 476: planned home birth.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):425-428. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820eee20.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820eee20
PMID:21252776
Abstract

Although the Committee on Obstetric Practice believes that hospitals and birthing centers are the safest setting for birth, it respects the right of a woman to make a medically informed decision about delivery. Women inquiring about planned home birth should be informed of its risks and benefits based on recent evidence. Specifically, they should be informed that although the absolute risk may be low, planned home birth is associated with a twofold to threefold increased risk of neonatal death when compared with planned hospital birth. Importantly, women should be informed that the appropriate selection of candidates for home birth; the availability of a certified nurse–midwife, certified midwife, or physician practicing within an integrated and regulated health system; ready access to consultation; and assurance of safe and timely transport to nearby hospitals are critical to reducing perinatal mortality rates and achieving favorable home birth outcomes.

摘要

尽管产科实践委员会认为医院和分娩中心是最安全的分娩场所,但它尊重妇女做出有关分娩的医学知情决策的权利。对于询问计划在家分娩的妇女,应根据最新证据告知其风险和益处。具体而言,应告知她们,尽管绝对风险可能较低,但与计划在医院分娩相比,计划在家分娩与新生儿死亡的风险增加两倍至三倍相关。重要的是,应告知妇女,适当选择适合在家分娩的人选;获得认证的护士助产士、认证的助产士或在综合和监管的卫生系统内执业的医生;随时可以咨询;并确保安全且及时地转往附近的医院,这些对于降低围产期死亡率和实现有利的在家分娩结果至关重要。

相似文献

1
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 476: planned home birth.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.476:计划中的家庭分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):425-428. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820eee20.
2
Committee Opinion No. 697: Planned Home Birth.第697号委员会意见:计划在家分娩
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e117-e122. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002024.
3
Committee Opinion No 697 Summary: Planned Home Birth.第697号委员会意见摘要:计划在家分娩
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):779-780. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002015.
4
Committee Opinion No. 669: Planned Home Birth.委员会意见 No.669:计划中的家庭分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):e26-31. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001586.
5
Committee Opinion No. 669 Summary: Planned Home Birth.委员会意见 No.669 概要:计划中的家庭分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;128(2):420-421. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001582.
6
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the type of birth attendant.美国的新生儿死亡率与出生地点(医院与家庭)有关,而与分娩助手的类型无关。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):254.e1-254.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.045. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications.计划在家分娩:对额外禁忌证的需求。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):401.e1-401.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
8
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States.美国计划在家分娩的围产期风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):350.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.021. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
9
Obstetric ethics: an essential dimension of planned home birth.产科伦理学:计划家庭分娩的重要维度。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1183-1187. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182172a97.
10
Utah obstetricians' opinions of planned home birth and conflicting NICE/ACOG guidelines: A qualitative study.犹他州产科医生对计划在家分娩及相互冲突的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所/美国妇产科医师学会指南的看法:一项定性研究。
Birth. 2017 Jun;44(2):137-144. doi: 10.1111/birt.12276. Epub 2017 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Planned Home Births in the United States Have Outcomes Comparable to Planned Birth Center Births for Low-Risk Birthing Individuals.美国的计划家庭分娩在低风险分娩个体的分娩中心分娩结果相当。
Med Care. 2024 Dec 1;62(12):820-829. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002074. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
2
Pivoting to Childbirth at Home or in Freestanding Birth Centers in the US During COVID-19: Safety, Economics and Logistics.新冠疫情期间美国转向在家分娩或在独立分娩中心分娩:安全性、经济性与后勤保障
Front Sociol. 2021 Mar 26;6:618210. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.618210. eCollection 2021.
3
Apgar Scoring System in Brazil's Live Births Records: Differences between Home and Hospital Births.
巴西活产记录中的阿普加评分系统:家庭分娩与医院分娩的差异。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019 Feb;41(2):76-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675572. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery.剖宫产术后计划在家分娩会增加严重的新生儿不良结局,如5分钟阿氏评分0分、癫痫发作或严重神经功能障碍。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0173952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173952. eCollection 2017.
5
Home Birth Midwifery in the United States : Evolutionary Origins and Modern Challenges.美国的家庭分娩助产:演变起源与现代挑战
Hum Nat. 2016 Dec;27(4):471-488. doi: 10.1007/s12110-016-9266-7.
6
Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants.美国计划在家分娩的新生儿死亡率与接生人员专业认证的关系。
PLoS One. 2016 May 17;11(5):e0155721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155721. eCollection 2016.
7
Institutional and Cultural Perspectives on Home Birth in Israel.以色列家庭分娩的制度与文化视角
J Perinat Educ. 2015;24(1):25-36. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.24.1.25.
8
Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.替代分娩地点的自主性:一项概念分析
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Nov;18(4):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s11019-015-9624-y.
9
Protocol: systematic review and meta-analyses of birth outcomes for women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital.方案:对打算在分娩开始时在家分娩的女性与低产科风险且打算在医院分娩的女性的分娩结局进行系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;3:55. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-55.